童年逆境的分子关联——应激调节的多组学视角。

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Johannes C S Zang, Caroline May, Katrin Marcus, Robert Kumsta
{"title":"童年逆境的分子关联——应激调节的多组学视角。","authors":"Johannes C S Zang, Caroline May, Katrin Marcus, Robert Kumsta","doi":"10.1080/10253890.2025.2495918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The experience of adversity in childhood can have life-long consequences on health outcomes. In search of mediators of this relationship, alterations of bio-behavioral and cellular regulatory systems came into focus, including those dealing with basic gene regulatory processes. System biology oriented approaches have been proposed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex multiple interrelations between and within layers of analysis. Here, we used co-expression based, supervised and unsupervised single and multi-omics systems approaches to investigate the association between childhood adversity and gene expression, protein expression and DNA methylation in CD14<sup>+</sup> monocytes in the context of psychosocial stress exposure, in a sample of healthy adults with (<i>n</i> = 29) or without (<i>n</i> = 27) a history of childhood adversity. Childhood adversity explained some variance at the single analyte level and within gene and protein co-expression structures. A single-omics, post-stress gene expression model differentiated best between participants with a history of childhood adversity and control participants in supervised analyses. In unsupervised analyses, a multi-omics based model showed best performance but separated participants based on sex only. Multi-omics analyses are a promising concept but might yield different results based on the specific approach taken and the omics-datasets supplied. We found that stress associated gene-expression pattern were most strongly associated with childhood adversity, and integrating multiple cellular layers did not results in better discriminatory performance in our rather small sample. The capacity and yield of different omics-profiling methods might currently limit the full potential of integrative approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":51173,"journal":{"name":"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress","volume":"28 1","pages":"2495918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular correlates of childhood adversity - a multi-omics perspective on stress regulation.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes C S Zang, Caroline May, Katrin Marcus, Robert Kumsta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10253890.2025.2495918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The experience of adversity in childhood can have life-long consequences on health outcomes. In search of mediators of this relationship, alterations of bio-behavioral and cellular regulatory systems came into focus, including those dealing with basic gene regulatory processes. System biology oriented approaches have been proposed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex multiple interrelations between and within layers of analysis. Here, we used co-expression based, supervised and unsupervised single and multi-omics systems approaches to investigate the association between childhood adversity and gene expression, protein expression and DNA methylation in CD14<sup>+</sup> monocytes in the context of psychosocial stress exposure, in a sample of healthy adults with (<i>n</i> = 29) or without (<i>n</i> = 27) a history of childhood adversity. Childhood adversity explained some variance at the single analyte level and within gene and protein co-expression structures. A single-omics, post-stress gene expression model differentiated best between participants with a history of childhood adversity and control participants in supervised analyses. In unsupervised analyses, a multi-omics based model showed best performance but separated participants based on sex only. Multi-omics analyses are a promising concept but might yield different results based on the specific approach taken and the omics-datasets supplied. We found that stress associated gene-expression pattern were most strongly associated with childhood adversity, and integrating multiple cellular layers did not results in better discriminatory performance in our rather small sample. The capacity and yield of different omics-profiling methods might currently limit the full potential of integrative approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"2495918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2025.2495918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2025.2495918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

童年时期的逆境经历可能对健康结果产生终生影响。为了寻找这种关系的介质,生物行为和细胞调节系统的改变成为焦点,包括那些处理基本基因调节过程的系统。系统生物学导向的方法已被提出,以获得对分析层之间和层内复杂的多重相互关系的更全面的理解。在这里,我们使用基于共表达、有监督和无监督的单组学和多组学系统方法,在社会心理压力暴露的背景下,在有(n = 29)或没有(n = 27)童年逆境史的健康成年人样本中,研究童年逆境与CD14+单核细胞基因表达、蛋白质表达和DNA甲基化之间的关系。童年逆境解释了在单个分析物水平和基因和蛋白质共表达结构内的一些差异。在监督分析中,单组学、应激后基因表达模型在有童年逆境史的参与者和对照组参与者之间区分得最好。在无监督分析中,基于多组学的模型表现最佳,但仅根据性别将参与者分开。多组学分析是一个很有前途的概念,但可能根据所采用的具体方法和所提供的组学数据集产生不同的结果。我们发现,与压力相关的基因表达模式与童年逆境的关系最为密切,在我们相当小的样本中,整合多个细胞层并没有导致更好的歧视性表现。不同组学分析方法的能力和产量目前可能限制了综合方法的全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Molecular correlates of childhood adversity - a multi-omics perspective on stress regulation.

The experience of adversity in childhood can have life-long consequences on health outcomes. In search of mediators of this relationship, alterations of bio-behavioral and cellular regulatory systems came into focus, including those dealing with basic gene regulatory processes. System biology oriented approaches have been proposed to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complex multiple interrelations between and within layers of analysis. Here, we used co-expression based, supervised and unsupervised single and multi-omics systems approaches to investigate the association between childhood adversity and gene expression, protein expression and DNA methylation in CD14+ monocytes in the context of psychosocial stress exposure, in a sample of healthy adults with (n = 29) or without (n = 27) a history of childhood adversity. Childhood adversity explained some variance at the single analyte level and within gene and protein co-expression structures. A single-omics, post-stress gene expression model differentiated best between participants with a history of childhood adversity and control participants in supervised analyses. In unsupervised analyses, a multi-omics based model showed best performance but separated participants based on sex only. Multi-omics analyses are a promising concept but might yield different results based on the specific approach taken and the omics-datasets supplied. We found that stress associated gene-expression pattern were most strongly associated with childhood adversity, and integrating multiple cellular layers did not results in better discriminatory performance in our rather small sample. The capacity and yield of different omics-profiling methods might currently limit the full potential of integrative approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Stress aims to provide scientists involved in stress research with the possibility of reading a more integrated view of the field. Peer reviewed papers, invited reviews and short communications will deal with interdisciplinary aspects of stress in terms of: the mechanisms of stressful stimulation, including within and between individuals; the physiological and behavioural responses to stress, and their regulation, in both the short and long term; adaptive mechanisms, coping strategies and the pathological consequences of stress. Stress will publish the latest developments in physiology, neurobiology, molecular biology, genetics research, immunology, and behavioural studies as they impact on the understanding of stress and its adverse consequences and their amelioration. Specific approaches may include transgenic/knockout animals, developmental/programming studies, electrophysiology, histochemistry, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, neuroanatomy, neuroimaging, endocrinology, autonomic physiology, immunology, chronic pain, ethological and other behavioural studies and clinical measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信