肝移植对酒精相关性肝炎试验终点选择的影响

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2025-04-30 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000709
Suthat Liangpunsakul, William B Krebs, Allison J Kwong, Paul Y Kwo, Robert S Brown, WeiQi Lin, Norman L Sussman
{"title":"肝移植对酒精相关性肝炎试验终点选择的影响","authors":"Suthat Liangpunsakul, William B Krebs, Allison J Kwong, Paul Y Kwo, Robert S Brown, WeiQi Lin, Norman L Sussman","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a serious liver disease caused by heavy alcohol consumption with severe cases exhibiting a 90-day mortality rate of ~30%. No drugs have been approved for AH, and regulatory approval currently requires evidence of improved survival. The lack of effective drug therapies and high mortality rates have fueled interest in early liver transplantation (LT), which has a survival rate that exceeds 90%. However, LT is resource-intensive and is available only in expert centers, where most AH trials are conducted. As a result, LT is overrepresented in recent AH studies, leading to confounding and unresolved questions regarding valid endpoints in therapeutic AH trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose methodological approaches to address the inclusion of LT in AH trials, supported by power calculations and data from the AHFIRM trial, a 300-patient multicenter study completed in late 2023. We demonstrate the impact of effect size, trial size, and statistical methods on trial design and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect size plays a crucial role in power calculations. While 90-day survival is the most efficient endpoint, competing risk analysis, primary stratum analysis, and win ratio are valuable tests for assessing the role of LT. The combined endpoint of death or LT is the least efficient method and requires the largest trial population to achieve statistical significance. We recommend using multiple statistical methods with adjustments for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adoption of early LT complicates the assessment of new therapies for AH. Statistical methods and endpoints are critical in power calculations and when assessing the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. We recommend mortality as the primary analysis complemented by hierarchical secondary analyses that avoid problems of multiplicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045545/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of liver transplantation on endpoint selection in alcohol-associated hepatitis trials.\",\"authors\":\"Suthat Liangpunsakul, William B Krebs, Allison J Kwong, Paul Y Kwo, Robert S Brown, WeiQi Lin, Norman L Sussman\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a serious liver disease caused by heavy alcohol consumption with severe cases exhibiting a 90-day mortality rate of ~30%. No drugs have been approved for AH, and regulatory approval currently requires evidence of improved survival. The lack of effective drug therapies and high mortality rates have fueled interest in early liver transplantation (LT), which has a survival rate that exceeds 90%. However, LT is resource-intensive and is available only in expert centers, where most AH trials are conducted. As a result, LT is overrepresented in recent AH studies, leading to confounding and unresolved questions regarding valid endpoints in therapeutic AH trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose methodological approaches to address the inclusion of LT in AH trials, supported by power calculations and data from the AHFIRM trial, a 300-patient multicenter study completed in late 2023. We demonstrate the impact of effect size, trial size, and statistical methods on trial design and interpretation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect size plays a crucial role in power calculations. While 90-day survival is the most efficient endpoint, competing risk analysis, primary stratum analysis, and win ratio are valuable tests for assessing the role of LT. The combined endpoint of death or LT is the least efficient method and requires the largest trial population to achieve statistical significance. We recommend using multiple statistical methods with adjustments for multiplicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adoption of early LT complicates the assessment of new therapies for AH. Statistical methods and endpoints are critical in power calculations and when assessing the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. We recommend mortality as the primary analysis complemented by hierarchical secondary analyses that avoid problems of multiplicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045545/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000709\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000709","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酒精相关性肝炎(AH)是一种由大量饮酒引起的严重肝脏疾病,重症病例90天死亡率约为30%。目前还没有药物被批准用于治疗AH,监管部门的批准需要有改善生存的证据。缺乏有效的药物治疗和高死亡率激发了人们对早期肝移植(LT)的兴趣,这种移植的存活率超过90%。然而,LT是资源密集型的,只能在专家中心使用,大多数AH试验都是在那里进行的。因此,在最近的AH研究中,LT被过度代表,导致治疗性AH试验中有效终点的混淆和未解决的问题。方法:我们提出了方法学方法来解决将LT纳入AH试验的问题,并得到了功率计算和AHFIRM试验数据的支持,AHFIRM试验是一项于2023年底完成的300名患者的多中心研究。我们论证了效应大小、试验大小和统计方法对试验设计和解释的影响。结果:效应量在功效计算中起着至关重要的作用。虽然90天生存期是最有效的终点,但竞争风险分析、初级阶层分析和胜率是评估LT作用的有价值的测试。死亡或LT的联合终点是效率最低的方法,需要最大的试验人群才能达到统计学意义。我们建议使用多种统计方法,并对多重性进行调整。结论:早期肝移植的采用使AH新疗法的评估复杂化。统计方法和终点在功率计算和评估新治疗剂的疗效时至关重要。我们建议将死亡率作为主要分析,辅以分层次分析,以避免多重性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of liver transplantation on endpoint selection in alcohol-associated hepatitis trials.

Background: Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is a serious liver disease caused by heavy alcohol consumption with severe cases exhibiting a 90-day mortality rate of ~30%. No drugs have been approved for AH, and regulatory approval currently requires evidence of improved survival. The lack of effective drug therapies and high mortality rates have fueled interest in early liver transplantation (LT), which has a survival rate that exceeds 90%. However, LT is resource-intensive and is available only in expert centers, where most AH trials are conducted. As a result, LT is overrepresented in recent AH studies, leading to confounding and unresolved questions regarding valid endpoints in therapeutic AH trials.

Methods: We propose methodological approaches to address the inclusion of LT in AH trials, supported by power calculations and data from the AHFIRM trial, a 300-patient multicenter study completed in late 2023. We demonstrate the impact of effect size, trial size, and statistical methods on trial design and interpretation.

Results: Effect size plays a crucial role in power calculations. While 90-day survival is the most efficient endpoint, competing risk analysis, primary stratum analysis, and win ratio are valuable tests for assessing the role of LT. The combined endpoint of death or LT is the least efficient method and requires the largest trial population to achieve statistical significance. We recommend using multiple statistical methods with adjustments for multiplicity.

Conclusions: The adoption of early LT complicates the assessment of new therapies for AH. Statistical methods and endpoints are critical in power calculations and when assessing the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. We recommend mortality as the primary analysis complemented by hierarchical secondary analyses that avoid problems of multiplicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信