心脏冠状动脉人工和人工智能分割的自动分割、放射组学可重复性和放射组学比较[18F]NaF PET/CT图像。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Suning Li, Jake Kendrick, Martin A Ebert, Ghulam Mubashar Hassan, Nathaniel Barry, Keaton Wright, Sing Ching Lee, Jamie W Bellinge, Carl Schultz
{"title":"心脏冠状动脉人工和人工智能分割的自动分割、放射组学可重复性和放射组学比较[18F]NaF PET/CT图像。","authors":"Suning Li, Jake Kendrick, Martin A Ebert, Ghulam Mubashar Hassan, Nathaniel Barry, Keaton Wright, Sing Ching Lee, Jamie W Bellinge, Carl Schultz","doi":"10.1186/s40658-025-00751-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>[<sup>18</sup>F]NaF is a potential biomarker for assessing cardiac risk. Automated analysis of [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF positron emission tomography (PET) images, specifically through quantitative image analysis (\"radiomics\"), can potentially enhance diagnostic accuracy and personalised patient management. However, it is essential to evaluate the reproducibility and reliability of radiomic features to ensure their clinical applicability. This study aimed to (i) develop and evaluate an automated model for coronary artery segmentation using [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET and calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) images, (ii) assess inter- and intra-observer radiomic reproducibility from manual segmentations, and (iii) evaluate the radiomics reliability from AI-derived segmentations by comparison with manual segmentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>141 patients from the \"effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity\" (VikCoVac, ACTRN12616000024448) trial were included. 113 were used to train an auto-segmentation model using nnUNet on [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET and CSCT images. Reproducibility of inter- and intra-observer radiomics and reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations was assessed using lower bound of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The auto-segmentation model achieved an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.61 ± 0.05, having no statistically significant difference compared to the intra-observer variability (p = 0.922). For the unfiltered images, 47(12.6%) CT and 25(7.5%) PET radiomics were inter-observer reproducible, while 133(35.8%) CT and 57(15.3%) PET radiomics were intra-observer reproducible. 7(9.7%) CT and 18(25.0%) PET first-order features, as well as 17(17.7%) CT GLCM features, were reproducible for both inter- and intra-observer analyses. 9.8% and 16.8% of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations showed excellent and good reliability. First-order features were most reliable (ICC > 0.75; 78/144[54.2%]) and shape features least (2/112[1.8%]). CT features demonstrated greater reliability (147/428[34.3%]) than PET (81/428 [18.9%]). Features from the left anterior descending (76/214[35.5%]) and right coronary artery (75/214[35.0%]) were more reliability than the circumflex (49/214[22.9%]) and left main (28/214[13.1%]) arteries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An effective segmentation model for coronary arteries was developed and reproducible [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET/CSCT radiomics were identified through inter- and intra-observer assessments, supporting their clinical applicability. The reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations compared to manual segmentations was highlighted. The novelty of [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF as a biomarker underscores its potential in providing unique insights into vascular calcification activity and cardiac risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>VIKCOVAC trial (\"effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity\"). Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000024448. URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368825 .</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"12 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Auto-segmentation, radiomic reproducibility, and comparison of radiomics between manual and AI-derived segmentations for coronary arteries in cardiac [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET/CT images.\",\"authors\":\"Suning Li, Jake Kendrick, Martin A Ebert, Ghulam Mubashar Hassan, Nathaniel Barry, Keaton Wright, Sing Ching Lee, Jamie W Bellinge, Carl Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40658-025-00751-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>[<sup>18</sup>F]NaF is a potential biomarker for assessing cardiac risk. Automated analysis of [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF positron emission tomography (PET) images, specifically through quantitative image analysis (\\\"radiomics\\\"), can potentially enhance diagnostic accuracy and personalised patient management. However, it is essential to evaluate the reproducibility and reliability of radiomic features to ensure their clinical applicability. This study aimed to (i) develop and evaluate an automated model for coronary artery segmentation using [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET and calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) images, (ii) assess inter- and intra-observer radiomic reproducibility from manual segmentations, and (iii) evaluate the radiomics reliability from AI-derived segmentations by comparison with manual segmentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>141 patients from the \\\"effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity\\\" (VikCoVac, ACTRN12616000024448) trial were included. 113 were used to train an auto-segmentation model using nnUNet on [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET and CSCT images. Reproducibility of inter- and intra-observer radiomics and reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations was assessed using lower bound of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The auto-segmentation model achieved an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.61 ± 0.05, having no statistically significant difference compared to the intra-observer variability (p = 0.922). For the unfiltered images, 47(12.6%) CT and 25(7.5%) PET radiomics were inter-observer reproducible, while 133(35.8%) CT and 57(15.3%) PET radiomics were intra-observer reproducible. 7(9.7%) CT and 18(25.0%) PET first-order features, as well as 17(17.7%) CT GLCM features, were reproducible for both inter- and intra-observer analyses. 9.8% and 16.8% of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations showed excellent and good reliability. First-order features were most reliable (ICC > 0.75; 78/144[54.2%]) and shape features least (2/112[1.8%]). CT features demonstrated greater reliability (147/428[34.3%]) than PET (81/428 [18.9%]). Features from the left anterior descending (76/214[35.5%]) and right coronary artery (75/214[35.0%]) were more reliability than the circumflex (49/214[22.9%]) and left main (28/214[13.1%]) arteries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An effective segmentation model for coronary arteries was developed and reproducible [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF PET/CSCT radiomics were identified through inter- and intra-observer assessments, supporting their clinical applicability. The reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations compared to manual segmentations was highlighted. The novelty of [<sup>18</sup>F]NaF as a biomarker underscores its potential in providing unique insights into vascular calcification activity and cardiac risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>VIKCOVAC trial (\\\"effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity\\\"). Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000024448. URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368825 .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034606/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00751-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-025-00751-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:[18F]NaF是评估心脏风险的潜在生物标志物。自动分析[18F]NaF正电子发射断层扫描(PET)图像,特别是通过定量图像分析(“放射组学”),可以潜在地提高诊断准确性和个性化患者管理。然而,评估放射学特征的再现性和可靠性是确保其临床适用性的必要条件。本研究旨在(i)开发和评估使用[18F]NaF PET和钙评分计算机断层扫描(CSCT)图像进行冠状动脉分割的自动化模型,(ii)评估人工分割的观察者之间和观察者内部放射组学可重复性,以及(iii)通过与人工分割的比较,评估人工智能衍生分割的放射组学可靠性。结果:纳入“维生素K和秋水仙碱对血管钙化活性的影响”(VikCoVac, ACTRN12616000024448)试验141例患者。113个模型在[18F]NaF PET和CSCT图像上使用nnUNet训练自动分割模型。使用类内相关系数(ICC)的下界评估了观察者间和观察者内部放射组学的可重复性以及人工智能衍生分割的放射组学的可靠性。自动分割模型的平均骰子相似系数为0.61±0.05,与观察者内部变异率相比差异无统计学意义(p = 0.922)。对于未过滤的图像,47张(12.6%)CT和25张(7.5%)PET放射组学具有观察者间可重复性,133张(35.8%)CT和57张(15.3%)PET放射组学具有观察者内可重复性。7个(9.7%)CT和18个(25.0%)PET一级特征,以及17个(17.7%)CT GLCM特征在观察者间和观察者内部分析中都是可重复的。9.8%和16.8%的人工智能放射组学显示出优异和良好的可靠性。一阶特征最可靠(ICC > 0.75;78/144[54.2%])和形状特征最少(2/112[1.8%])。CT表现的可靠性(147/428[34.3%])高于PET(81/428[18.9%])。左前降支(76/214[35.5%])和右冠状动脉(75/214[35.0%])的特征比旋支(49/214[22.9%])和左主干(28/214[13.1%])的特征更可靠。结论:建立了一种有效的冠状动脉分割模型,并通过观察者间和观察者内部评估确定了可重复的NaF PET/CSCT放射组学[18F],支持其临床适用性。强调了与人工分割相比,人工智能衍生分割的放射组学的可靠性。[18F]NaF作为生物标志物的新颖性强调了其在血管钙化活动和心脏风险评估方面提供独特见解的潜力。临床试验注册:VIKCOVAC试验(“维生素K和秋水仙碱对血管钙化活性的影响”)。唯一标识符:ACTRN12616000024448。网址:https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368825。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Auto-segmentation, radiomic reproducibility, and comparison of radiomics between manual and AI-derived segmentations for coronary arteries in cardiac [18F]NaF PET/CT images.

Background: [18F]NaF is a potential biomarker for assessing cardiac risk. Automated analysis of [18F]NaF positron emission tomography (PET) images, specifically through quantitative image analysis ("radiomics"), can potentially enhance diagnostic accuracy and personalised patient management. However, it is essential to evaluate the reproducibility and reliability of radiomic features to ensure their clinical applicability. This study aimed to (i) develop and evaluate an automated model for coronary artery segmentation using [18F]NaF PET and calcium scoring computed tomography (CSCT) images, (ii) assess inter- and intra-observer radiomic reproducibility from manual segmentations, and (iii) evaluate the radiomics reliability from AI-derived segmentations by comparison with manual segmentations.

Results: 141 patients from the "effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity" (VikCoVac, ACTRN12616000024448) trial were included. 113 were used to train an auto-segmentation model using nnUNet on [18F]NaF PET and CSCT images. Reproducibility of inter- and intra-observer radiomics and reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations was assessed using lower bound of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The auto-segmentation model achieved an average Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.61 ± 0.05, having no statistically significant difference compared to the intra-observer variability (p = 0.922). For the unfiltered images, 47(12.6%) CT and 25(7.5%) PET radiomics were inter-observer reproducible, while 133(35.8%) CT and 57(15.3%) PET radiomics were intra-observer reproducible. 7(9.7%) CT and 18(25.0%) PET first-order features, as well as 17(17.7%) CT GLCM features, were reproducible for both inter- and intra-observer analyses. 9.8% and 16.8% of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations showed excellent and good reliability. First-order features were most reliable (ICC > 0.75; 78/144[54.2%]) and shape features least (2/112[1.8%]). CT features demonstrated greater reliability (147/428[34.3%]) than PET (81/428 [18.9%]). Features from the left anterior descending (76/214[35.5%]) and right coronary artery (75/214[35.0%]) were more reliability than the circumflex (49/214[22.9%]) and left main (28/214[13.1%]) arteries.

Conclusions: An effective segmentation model for coronary arteries was developed and reproducible [18F]NaF PET/CSCT radiomics were identified through inter- and intra-observer assessments, supporting their clinical applicability. The reliability of radiomics from AI-derived segmentations compared to manual segmentations was highlighted. The novelty of [18F]NaF as a biomarker underscores its potential in providing unique insights into vascular calcification activity and cardiac risk assessment.

Clinical trial registration: VIKCOVAC trial ("effects of Vitamin K and Colchicine on vascular calcification activity"). Unique identifier: ACTRN12616000024448. URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=368825 .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信