基于多模态磁共振图像诊断脑卒中类型和严重程度的多分类深度学习方法。

IF 1.1 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors Pub Date : 2025-04-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jmss.jmss_37_24
Sahar Felehgari, Payam Sariaslani, Sepideh Shamsizadeh, Saba Felehgari, Anahita Rajabi, Hiwa Mohammadi
{"title":"基于多模态磁共振图像诊断脑卒中类型和严重程度的多分类深度学习方法。","authors":"Sahar Felehgari, Payam Sariaslani, Sepideh Shamsizadeh, Saba Felehgari, Anahita Rajabi, Hiwa Mohammadi","doi":"10.4103/jmss.jmss_37_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decisions for stroke treatments, such as thrombolytic drugs for ischemic strokes or anticoagulants for hemorrhagic strokes, rely on accurate diagnosis and severity assessment. Our study uses diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to differentiate healthy and stroke samples, classify stroke types, and predict severity, aiding in decision-making for stroke management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 143 patients: 85 with ischemic stroke and 58 with hemorrhagic stroke. For stroke diagnosis, we compared multimodal (apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) and single-modal (using separate images) preprocessing techniques. Our study introduced two models, Added CNN Layer-ResNet-50 (ACL-ResNet-50) and Added CNN Layer-MobileNetV1 (ACL-MobileNetV1), based on transfer learning (MobileNetV1 and ResNet-50), enhancing performance through reinforced layers. We compared our proposed models with a scenario in which only the final layer was replaced in ResNet-50 and MobileNetV1. Furthermore, we predicted National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in three ranges based on DWI images to gauge stroke severity. Evaluation criteria for the models included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stroke classification (normal, ischemic, and hemorrhagic), ACL-MobileNetV1 outperformed other models, achieving 98% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% AUC. For assessing ischemic stroke severity using NIHSS ranges, ACL-ResNet-50 showed the optimal performance with an accuracy of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.92, and AUC of 0.95.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study's proposed method effectively classified stroke type and severity based on multimodal MR images, potentially as a practical decision support tool for stroke treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors","volume":"15 ","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-classification Deep Learning Approach for Diagnosing Stroke Type and Severity Using Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images.\",\"authors\":\"Sahar Felehgari, Payam Sariaslani, Sepideh Shamsizadeh, Saba Felehgari, Anahita Rajabi, Hiwa Mohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmss.jmss_37_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical decisions for stroke treatments, such as thrombolytic drugs for ischemic strokes or anticoagulants for hemorrhagic strokes, rely on accurate diagnosis and severity assessment. Our study uses diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to differentiate healthy and stroke samples, classify stroke types, and predict severity, aiding in decision-making for stroke management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 143 patients: 85 with ischemic stroke and 58 with hemorrhagic stroke. For stroke diagnosis, we compared multimodal (apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) and single-modal (using separate images) preprocessing techniques. Our study introduced two models, Added CNN Layer-ResNet-50 (ACL-ResNet-50) and Added CNN Layer-MobileNetV1 (ACL-MobileNetV1), based on transfer learning (MobileNetV1 and ResNet-50), enhancing performance through reinforced layers. We compared our proposed models with a scenario in which only the final layer was replaced in ResNet-50 and MobileNetV1. Furthermore, we predicted National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in three ranges based on DWI images to gauge stroke severity. Evaluation criteria for the models included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In stroke classification (normal, ischemic, and hemorrhagic), ACL-MobileNetV1 outperformed other models, achieving 98% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% AUC. For assessing ischemic stroke severity using NIHSS ranges, ACL-ResNet-50 showed the optimal performance with an accuracy of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.92, and AUC of 0.95.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study's proposed method effectively classified stroke type and severity based on multimodal MR images, potentially as a practical decision support tool for stroke treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_37_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmss.jmss_37_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑卒中治疗的临床决策,如缺血性脑卒中的溶栓药物或出血性脑卒中的抗凝药物,依赖于准确的诊断和严重程度评估。我们的研究使用弥散加权磁共振成像和卷积神经网络(cnn)来区分健康和中风样本,对中风类型进行分类,并预测严重程度,帮助中风管理决策。方法:对143例患者进行评价,其中缺血性脑卒中85例,出血性脑卒中58例。对于脑卒中诊断,我们比较了多模态(表观扩散系数和扩散加权成像[DWI])和单模态(使用单独图像)预处理技术。我们的研究引入了两个模型,即基于迁移学习(MobileNetV1和ResNet-50)的Added CNN Layer-ResNet-50 (ACL-ResNet-50)和Added CNN Layer-MobileNetV1 (ACL-MobileNetV1),通过增强层来提高性能。我们将我们提出的模型与ResNet-50和MobileNetV1中仅替换最后一层的场景进行了比较。此外,我们根据DWI图像预测了美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)在三个范围内的评分,以衡量卒中的严重程度。评价标准包括准确性、敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:在脑卒中分类(正常、缺血和出血性)方面,ACL-MobileNetV1优于其他模型,达到98%的准确率、99%的灵敏度、98%的特异性和99%的AUC。对于使用NIHSS范围评估缺血性卒中严重程度,ACL-ResNet-50表现出最佳性能,准确率为0.92,灵敏度为0.84,特异性为0.92,AUC为0.95。结论:本研究提出的方法基于多模态MR图像有效分类脑卒中类型和严重程度,有可能作为脑卒中治疗的实用决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multi-classification Deep Learning Approach for Diagnosing Stroke Type and Severity Using Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Images.

Background: Clinical decisions for stroke treatments, such as thrombolytic drugs for ischemic strokes or anticoagulants for hemorrhagic strokes, rely on accurate diagnosis and severity assessment. Our study uses diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to differentiate healthy and stroke samples, classify stroke types, and predict severity, aiding in decision-making for stroke management.

Methods: We evaluated 143 patients: 85 with ischemic stroke and 58 with hemorrhagic stroke. For stroke diagnosis, we compared multimodal (apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) and single-modal (using separate images) preprocessing techniques. Our study introduced two models, Added CNN Layer-ResNet-50 (ACL-ResNet-50) and Added CNN Layer-MobileNetV1 (ACL-MobileNetV1), based on transfer learning (MobileNetV1 and ResNet-50), enhancing performance through reinforced layers. We compared our proposed models with a scenario in which only the final layer was replaced in ResNet-50 and MobileNetV1. Furthermore, we predicted National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores in three ranges based on DWI images to gauge stroke severity. Evaluation criteria for the models included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC).

Results: In stroke classification (normal, ischemic, and hemorrhagic), ACL-MobileNetV1 outperformed other models, achieving 98% accuracy, 99% sensitivity, 98% specificity, and 99% AUC. For assessing ischemic stroke severity using NIHSS ranges, ACL-ResNet-50 showed the optimal performance with an accuracy of 0.92, sensitivity of 0.84, specificity of 0.92, and AUC of 0.95.

Conclusion: Our study's proposed method effectively classified stroke type and severity based on multimodal MR images, potentially as a practical decision support tool for stroke treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors
Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: JMSS is an interdisciplinary journal that incorporates all aspects of the biomedical engineering including bioelectrics, bioinformatics, medical physics, health technology assessment, etc. Subject areas covered by the journal include: - Bioelectric: Bioinstruments Biosensors Modeling Biomedical signal processing Medical image analysis and processing Medical imaging devices Control of biological systems Neuromuscular systems Cognitive sciences Telemedicine Robotic Medical ultrasonography Bioelectromagnetics Electrophysiology Cell tracking - Bioinformatics and medical informatics: Analysis of biological data Data mining Stochastic modeling Computational genomics Artificial intelligence & fuzzy Applications Medical softwares Bioalgorithms Electronic health - Biophysics and medical physics: Computed tomography Radiation therapy Laser therapy - Education in biomedical engineering - Health technology assessment - Standard in biomedical engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信