代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎患者的心血管事件、死亡率和2型糖尿病:一项基于索赔的商业和医疗保险优势参保者分析

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Semiu O Gbadamosi, Jason P Swindle, Hai Nguyen, Qian Li, Anthony Hoovler
{"title":"代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎患者的心血管事件、死亡率和2型糖尿病:一项基于索赔的商业和医疗保险优势参保者分析","authors":"Semiu O Gbadamosi, Jason P Swindle, Hai Nguyen, Qian Li, Anthony Hoovler","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2490303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the risks of cardiovascular events, incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) compared with those without MASH in a large real-world setting in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed US claims data from Optum®'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database from October 2015 to December 2022. Patients with newly diagnosed MASH were matched 1:1 on age, sex, region, and index month-year with patients without MASH, and repeated for a subgroup without baseline diabetes. Risks of clinical outcomes associated with MASH were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 24,278 matched pairs in the patients with and without MASH cohorts. Patients with MASH had increased risks for any cardiovascular event (adjusted HR: 1.48 [95% CI = 1.38-1.58]), and all-cause mortality (1.31; 1.20-1.42) compared to those without MASH. For the subgroup without baseline diabetes (10,027 matched pairs), the adjusted HRs were 1.94 (95% CI = 1.68-2.23) for incident T2D and 1.40 (95% CI = 1.20-1.64) for all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest increased risks of cardiovascular events, incident T2D, and mortality among patients newly diagnosed with MASH compared with patients without MASH.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"823-832"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiovascular events, mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a claims-based analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees.\",\"authors\":\"Semiu O Gbadamosi, Jason P Swindle, Hai Nguyen, Qian Li, Anthony Hoovler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2490303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the risks of cardiovascular events, incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) compared with those without MASH in a large real-world setting in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed US claims data from Optum®'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database from October 2015 to December 2022. Patients with newly diagnosed MASH were matched 1:1 on age, sex, region, and index month-year with patients without MASH, and repeated for a subgroup without baseline diabetes. Risks of clinical outcomes associated with MASH were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 24,278 matched pairs in the patients with and without MASH cohorts. Patients with MASH had increased risks for any cardiovascular event (adjusted HR: 1.48 [95% CI = 1.38-1.58]), and all-cause mortality (1.31; 1.20-1.42) compared to those without MASH. For the subgroup without baseline diabetes (10,027 matched pairs), the adjusted HRs were 1.94 (95% CI = 1.68-2.23) for incident T2D and 1.40 (95% CI = 1.20-1.64) for all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest increased risks of cardiovascular events, incident T2D, and mortality among patients newly diagnosed with MASH compared with patients without MASH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"823-832\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2490303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2490303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是在美国的一个大型现实环境中,比较新诊断为代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)的患者与未诊断为MASH的患者的心血管事件、2型糖尿病(T2D)和死亡率的风险。方法:回顾性分析2015年10月至2022年12月Optum®去识别Clinformatics®数据集市数据库中的美国索赔数据。将新诊断为MASH的患者与未诊断为MASH的患者在年龄、性别、地区和指标上进行1:1匹配,并对无基线糖尿病的亚组进行重复匹配。使用Cox比例风险模型评估与MASH相关的临床结果风险。结果:该研究包括24278对有和没有MASH的患者。MASH患者发生任何心血管事件的风险增加(调整后风险比:1.48 [95% CI = 1.38-1.58]),全因死亡率增加(1.31;1.20-1.42)。对于没有基线糖尿病的亚组(10027对配对组),T2D事件的调整hr为1.94 (95% CI = 1.68-2.23),全因死亡率的调整hr为1.40 (95% CI = 1.20-1.64)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,新诊断为MASH的患者与未诊断为MASH的患者相比,心血管事件、T2D事件和死亡率的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiovascular events, mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a claims-based analysis of commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees.

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the risks of cardiovascular events, incident type 2 diabetes (T2D), and mortality in patients with newly diagnosed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) compared with those without MASH in a large real-world setting in the US.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed US claims data from Optum®'s de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database from October 2015 to December 2022. Patients with newly diagnosed MASH were matched 1:1 on age, sex, region, and index month-year with patients without MASH, and repeated for a subgroup without baseline diabetes. Risks of clinical outcomes associated with MASH were assessed using Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: The study comprised 24,278 matched pairs in the patients with and without MASH cohorts. Patients with MASH had increased risks for any cardiovascular event (adjusted HR: 1.48 [95% CI = 1.38-1.58]), and all-cause mortality (1.31; 1.20-1.42) compared to those without MASH. For the subgroup without baseline diabetes (10,027 matched pairs), the adjusted HRs were 1.94 (95% CI = 1.68-2.23) for incident T2D and 1.40 (95% CI = 1.20-1.64) for all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest increased risks of cardiovascular events, incident T2D, and mortality among patients newly diagnosed with MASH compared with patients without MASH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信