探究残疾与职业治疗:职业治疗学生的观点。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
British Journal of Occupational Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1177/03080226241309469
Hannah Darton, Alison Wadey, Alison Laver-Fawcett
{"title":"探究残疾与职业治疗:职业治疗学生的观点。","authors":"Hannah Darton, Alison Wadey, Alison Laver-Fawcett","doi":"10.1177/03080226241309469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore occupational therapy students' perspectives on ableism and its implications for occupational therapy practice. This formed part of a wider study that also explored occupational therapy educators' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was used to collect students' perspectives, using a mixture of Likert scales and open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The sample comprised 56 occupational therapy students from the United Kingdom (<i>n</i> = 36), United States of America (<i>n</i> = 16) and Canada (<i>n</i> = 4) enrolled in a mixture of undergraduate (<i>n</i> = 13) and postgraduate (<i>n</i> = 43) pre-registration degree programmes. Thirty-four percent of respondents perceived occupational therapy as inherently ableist. This rose to 50% after respondents were presented with a comprehensive definition of ableism. Students reported witnessing and/or experiencing ableism within education (63%) and practice placements (55%). Eighty-six percent of students recognised they may hold unconscious ableist views, and 96% agreed they would like more support to engage in disability studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/impact: </strong>Findings indicated a potential link between understanding of ableism and students' views that occupational therapy is ableist. Most students were aware of the potential they hold unconscious biases and welcomed support to engage further with disability studies. Further qualitative research is needed. Following this, systemic changes to address the harm of ableism can begin to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"88 5","pages":"281-291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring ableism and occupational therapy: Occupational therapy students' perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Darton, Alison Wadey, Alison Laver-Fawcett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03080226241309469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore occupational therapy students' perspectives on ableism and its implications for occupational therapy practice. This formed part of a wider study that also explored occupational therapy educators' perspectives.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was used to collect students' perspectives, using a mixture of Likert scales and open-ended questions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The sample comprised 56 occupational therapy students from the United Kingdom (<i>n</i> = 36), United States of America (<i>n</i> = 16) and Canada (<i>n</i> = 4) enrolled in a mixture of undergraduate (<i>n</i> = 13) and postgraduate (<i>n</i> = 43) pre-registration degree programmes. Thirty-four percent of respondents perceived occupational therapy as inherently ableist. This rose to 50% after respondents were presented with a comprehensive definition of ableism. Students reported witnessing and/or experiencing ableism within education (63%) and practice placements (55%). Eighty-six percent of students recognised they may hold unconscious ableist views, and 96% agreed they would like more support to engage in disability studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/impact: </strong>Findings indicated a potential link between understanding of ableism and students' views that occupational therapy is ableist. Most students were aware of the potential they hold unconscious biases and welcomed support to engage further with disability studies. Further qualitative research is needed. Following this, systemic changes to address the harm of ableism can begin to be addressed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"88 5\",\"pages\":\"281-291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046152/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241309469\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226241309469","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨职业治疗学生对残疾的看法及其对职业治疗实践的启示。这是一项更广泛的研究的一部分,该研究也探索了职业治疗教育者的观点。方法:采用李克特量表和开放式问题相结合的在线调查方式收集学生的观点。研究结果:样本包括来自英国(n = 36)、美国(n = 16)和加拿大(n = 4)的56名职业治疗专业学生,他们参加了本科(n = 13)和研究生(n = 43)的预注册学位课程。34%的受访者认为职业治疗本质上是残疾主义者。在向受访者提供了全面的残疾歧视定义后,这一比例上升到了50%。学生报告在教育(63%)和实习(55%)中目睹和/或经历过残疾歧视。86%的学生承认他们可能无意识地持有残疾主义观点,96%的学生同意他们希望得到更多的支持来从事残疾研究。结论/影响:研究结果表明对残疾歧视的理解与学生对职业治疗是残疾歧视的看法之间存在潜在的联系。大多数学生都意识到他们可能存在无意识的偏见,并欢迎支持他们进一步参与残疾研究。需要进一步的定性研究。在此之后,解决残疾歧视危害的系统性变革可以开始得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring ableism and occupational therapy: Occupational therapy students' perspectives.

Aim: To explore occupational therapy students' perspectives on ableism and its implications for occupational therapy practice. This formed part of a wider study that also explored occupational therapy educators' perspectives.

Method: An online survey was used to collect students' perspectives, using a mixture of Likert scales and open-ended questions.

Findings: The sample comprised 56 occupational therapy students from the United Kingdom (n = 36), United States of America (n = 16) and Canada (n = 4) enrolled in a mixture of undergraduate (n = 13) and postgraduate (n = 43) pre-registration degree programmes. Thirty-four percent of respondents perceived occupational therapy as inherently ableist. This rose to 50% after respondents were presented with a comprehensive definition of ableism. Students reported witnessing and/or experiencing ableism within education (63%) and practice placements (55%). Eighty-six percent of students recognised they may hold unconscious ableist views, and 96% agreed they would like more support to engage in disability studies.

Conclusion/impact: Findings indicated a potential link between understanding of ableism and students' views that occupational therapy is ableist. Most students were aware of the potential they hold unconscious biases and welcomed support to engage further with disability studies. Further qualitative research is needed. Following this, systemic changes to address the harm of ableism can begin to be addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信