探索利用和实施科学战略的囊性纤维化登记医疗保健改善的有效性:一个系统的回顾。

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-04-16 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0227-2024
Rob G Stirling, Bhumika Sood, Macken J L Stirling, Tom Kotsimbos, Dominic T Keating, Catherine E Rang, James M Trauer, Alan C Young, Christiaan Yu, Julianna Bailey, Peter Wark, Angela Melder, Paul Dawkins
{"title":"探索利用和实施科学战略的囊性纤维化登记医疗保健改善的有效性:一个系统的回顾。","authors":"Rob G Stirling, Bhumika Sood, Macken J L Stirling, Tom Kotsimbos, Dominic T Keating, Catherine E Rang, James M Trauer, Alan C Young, Christiaan Yu, Julianna Bailey, Peter Wark, Angela Melder, Paul Dawkins","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0227-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystic fibrosis (CF) registries capture important information in high-burden health domains to support improvement in health outcomes, although a number of unanswered questions persist, as follows. 1) Do CF registries utilise implementation science strategies to improve patient outcomes? 2) Which implementation strategies have been engaged? 3) Has the engagement of these strategies been effective in improving clinical outcomes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review to exploring the use of implementation science strategies by CF registries for healthcare improvement. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare and Web of Science databases for use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementations and use of the Knowledge to Action framework for improvement. We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool for risk-of-bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1974 citations were identified and 12 studies included. Included studies described 45 ERIC implementation strategies from nine categories. Strategies included \"use evaluative and iterative strategies\" (n=9) and \"develop stakeholder interrelationships\" (n=10). Least-used strategies were \"utilise financial strategies\" (n=1), \"support clinicians\" category (n=3) and \"provide interactive assistance\" (n=2). All 12 studies utilised monitoring of knowledge use, and assessing barriers and facilitators of knowledge use. Only seven studies utilised mechanisms to sustain knowledge use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reported studies describe significant benefits in important CF outcomes for people with CF reported at site-specific and population levels. Studies highlighted the importance of governance, leadership, patient and family engagement, multidisciplinary engagement, quality improvement, data and analytics and research. The ready availability of clinical performance data feedback to clinicians and patients by CF registries is likely to strengthen the effectiveness of CF registries in driving healthcare improvement within a learning health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 176","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies by cystic fibrosis registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Rob G Stirling, Bhumika Sood, Macken J L Stirling, Tom Kotsimbos, Dominic T Keating, Catherine E Rang, James M Trauer, Alan C Young, Christiaan Yu, Julianna Bailey, Peter Wark, Angela Melder, Paul Dawkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0227-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cystic fibrosis (CF) registries capture important information in high-burden health domains to support improvement in health outcomes, although a number of unanswered questions persist, as follows. 1) Do CF registries utilise implementation science strategies to improve patient outcomes? 2) Which implementation strategies have been engaged? 3) Has the engagement of these strategies been effective in improving clinical outcomes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a systematic review to exploring the use of implementation science strategies by CF registries for healthcare improvement. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare and Web of Science databases for use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementations and use of the Knowledge to Action framework for improvement. We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool for risk-of-bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1974 citations were identified and 12 studies included. Included studies described 45 ERIC implementation strategies from nine categories. Strategies included \\\"use evaluative and iterative strategies\\\" (n=9) and \\\"develop stakeholder interrelationships\\\" (n=10). Least-used strategies were \\\"utilise financial strategies\\\" (n=1), \\\"support clinicians\\\" category (n=3) and \\\"provide interactive assistance\\\" (n=2). All 12 studies utilised monitoring of knowledge use, and assessing barriers and facilitators of knowledge use. Only seven studies utilised mechanisms to sustain knowledge use.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reported studies describe significant benefits in important CF outcomes for people with CF reported at site-specific and population levels. Studies highlighted the importance of governance, leadership, patient and family engagement, multidisciplinary engagement, quality improvement, data and analytics and research. The ready availability of clinical performance data feedback to clinicians and patients by CF registries is likely to strengthen the effectiveness of CF registries in driving healthcare improvement within a learning health system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"volume\":\"34 176\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000907/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0227-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0227-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:囊性纤维化(CF)登记获取了高负担卫生领域的重要信息,以支持改善健康结果,尽管仍存在一些未解决的问题,如下。1) CF注册是否利用实施科学策略来改善患者预后?2)采用了哪些实施策略?3)这些策略的参与是否有效地改善了临床结果?方法:我们进行了一项系统综述,探讨CF注册中心在医疗保健改善方面使用实施科学策略的情况。我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Emcare和Web of Science数据库,查找实施变革的专家建议(ERIC)实施和知识到行动框架的改进使用。我们使用非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险工具进行偏倚风险评估。结果:收录了1974篇引文,12篇研究。纳入的研究描述了9个类别的45个ERIC实施策略。策略包括“使用评估和迭代策略”(n=9)和“发展利益相关者的相互关系”(n=10)。使用最少的策略是“利用财务策略”(n=1)、“支持临床医生”类别(n=3)和“提供互动协助”(n=2)。所有12项研究都对知识使用进行了监测,并评估了知识使用的障碍和促进因素。只有7项研究利用了维持知识使用的机制。讨论:报告的研究描述了在特定地点和人群水平上报告的CF患者的重要CF结局的显着益处。研究强调了治理、领导力、患者和家庭参与、多学科参与、质量改进、数据和分析以及研究的重要性。CF登记处向临床医生和患者提供临床表现数据反馈的现成可用性可能会加强CF登记处在推动学习型卫生系统内医疗保健改进方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies by cystic fibrosis registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review.

Background: Cystic fibrosis (CF) registries capture important information in high-burden health domains to support improvement in health outcomes, although a number of unanswered questions persist, as follows. 1) Do CF registries utilise implementation science strategies to improve patient outcomes? 2) Which implementation strategies have been engaged? 3) Has the engagement of these strategies been effective in improving clinical outcomes?

Methods: We undertook a systematic review to exploring the use of implementation science strategies by CF registries for healthcare improvement. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Emcare and Web of Science databases for use of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementations and use of the Knowledge to Action framework for improvement. We used the Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions tool for risk-of-bias assessment.

Results: 1974 citations were identified and 12 studies included. Included studies described 45 ERIC implementation strategies from nine categories. Strategies included "use evaluative and iterative strategies" (n=9) and "develop stakeholder interrelationships" (n=10). Least-used strategies were "utilise financial strategies" (n=1), "support clinicians" category (n=3) and "provide interactive assistance" (n=2). All 12 studies utilised monitoring of knowledge use, and assessing barriers and facilitators of knowledge use. Only seven studies utilised mechanisms to sustain knowledge use.

Discussion: Reported studies describe significant benefits in important CF outcomes for people with CF reported at site-specific and population levels. Studies highlighted the importance of governance, leadership, patient and family engagement, multidisciplinary engagement, quality improvement, data and analytics and research. The ready availability of clinical performance data feedback to clinicians and patients by CF registries is likely to strengthen the effectiveness of CF registries in driving healthcare improvement within a learning health system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信