托马斯·伯福德在塑造20世纪烟草诉讼中的作用。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hannah S Lee, Divyansh Agarwal
{"title":"托马斯·伯福德在塑造20世纪烟草诉讼中的作用。","authors":"Hannah S Lee, Divyansh Agarwal","doi":"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The role of thoracic surgeon Dr Thomas Hannahan Burford in supporting the tobacco industry elucidates the complexities of medical authority in the mid-20th century. Amid evolving societal attitudes and growing epidemiological evidence, Dr Burford disputed findings linking smoking to lung cancer by relying on anecdotal clinical experience, dismissing statistical evidence, and critiquing other physicians' credibility. Occupational pride, a commitment to scientific objectivity, and the cultural stigmas of the time all influenced his presence in court. The case of Dr Burford challenges the narrative that corporations solely drove tobacco litigation, highlighting the influence of physicians in shaping public doubt. By examining his methods and motivations, the paper explores the intricacies behind the intersections of science, law, and culture in public health debates.</p>","PeriodicalId":17140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Thomas Burford in Shaping Tobacco Litigation in the 20th Century.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah S Lee, Divyansh Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/XCS.0000000000001436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The role of thoracic surgeon Dr Thomas Hannahan Burford in supporting the tobacco industry elucidates the complexities of medical authority in the mid-20th century. Amid evolving societal attitudes and growing epidemiological evidence, Dr Burford disputed findings linking smoking to lung cancer by relying on anecdotal clinical experience, dismissing statistical evidence, and critiquing other physicians' credibility. Occupational pride, a commitment to scientific objectivity, and the cultural stigmas of the time all influenced his presence in court. The case of Dr Burford challenges the narrative that corporations solely drove tobacco litigation, highlighting the influence of physicians in shaping public doubt. By examining his methods and motivations, the paper explores the intricacies behind the intersections of science, law, and culture in public health debates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XCS.0000000000001436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胸外科医生托马斯·汉纳汉·伯福德博士在支持烟草业方面的作用说明了20世纪中期医疗权威的复杂性。在不断演变的社会态度和越来越多的流行病学证据中,伯福德博士依靠轶事临床经验,驳斥统计证据,并批评其他医生的可信度,对吸烟与肺癌有关的发现提出了质疑。职业自豪感,对科学客观性的承诺,以及当时的文化耻辱都影响了他在法庭上的出现。伯福德博士的案例挑战了公司单独推动烟草诉讼的说法,突出了医生在塑造公众疑虑方面的影响。通过研究他的方法和动机,本文探讨了公共卫生辩论中科学、法律和文化交叉点背后的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Thomas Burford in Shaping Tobacco Litigation in the 20th Century.

The role of thoracic surgeon Dr Thomas Hannahan Burford in supporting the tobacco industry elucidates the complexities of medical authority in the mid-20th century. Amid evolving societal attitudes and growing epidemiological evidence, Dr Burford disputed findings linking smoking to lung cancer by relying on anecdotal clinical experience, dismissing statistical evidence, and critiquing other physicians' credibility. Occupational pride, a commitment to scientific objectivity, and the cultural stigmas of the time all influenced his presence in court. The case of Dr Burford challenges the narrative that corporations solely drove tobacco litigation, highlighting the influence of physicians in shaping public doubt. By examining his methods and motivations, the paper explores the intricacies behind the intersections of science, law, and culture in public health debates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.80%
发文量
1515
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Surgeons (JACS) is a monthly journal publishing peer-reviewed original contributions on all aspects of surgery. These contributions include, but are not limited to, original clinical studies, review articles, and experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance. In general, case reports are not considered for publication. As the official scientific journal of the American College of Surgeons, JACS has the goal of providing its readership the highest quality rapid retrieval of information relevant to surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信