广州市居家残疾长期护理保险受益人的补偿偏好

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yi Qian, Yusupujiang Tuersun, Duqiao Li, Lan Luo, Yingdan Kou, Wenhao Yuan, Lehuan Li, Liancheng Zheng, Mengping Wu, Wenyu Wang, Jiangyun Chen
{"title":"广州市居家残疾长期护理保险受益人的补偿偏好","authors":"Yi Qian, Yusupujiang Tuersun, Duqiao Li, Lan Luo, Yingdan Kou, Wenhao Yuan, Lehuan Li, Liancheng Zheng, Mengping Wu, Wenyu Wang, Jiangyun Chen","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explores the preferences and willingness-to-pay of home-based disabled elderly individuals for long-term care insurance (LTCI) compensation mechanisms in Guangzhou, China, using a discrete choice experiment. The research aims to identify preferred compensation strategies, analyze heterogeneity in preferences, and provide recommendations for policy optimization. Using purposive and cluster sampling, 156 eligible participants were identified, with 96 completing the survey (response rate: 61.5.%). Disabled elderly individuals were defined based on activities of daily living assessments. A conditional Logit model was applied to analyze preferences, and subgroup analyses examined differences by education, gender, activities of daily living status, and caregiving arrangements. Key findings include preferences for medical care over life care, family caregivers over professional ones, and cash subsidies over mixed or proportional reimbursement. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $21.60 for medical care and $25.26 for cash subsidies (1 USD = 7.3 CNY). The average out-of-pocket cost for LTCI services was $27.39 per session, with a sub-average cost of $16.44 for basic care services. Subgroup analyses revealed higher-educated individuals favored medical care, while lower-educated groups prioritized affordability. Severely disabled individuals preferred professional caregivers, such as registered nurses. This study highlights the need to expand medical care services, integrate flexible compensation models, and tailor policies to demographic differences. The findings provide evidence for optimizing China's LTCI system and offer insights for aging populations in low- and middle-income countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":"40 5","pages":"556-565"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063582/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compensation preferences of home-based disabled beneficiaries in the long-term care insurance system in Guangzhou, China.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Qian, Yusupujiang Tuersun, Duqiao Li, Lan Luo, Yingdan Kou, Wenhao Yuan, Lehuan Li, Liancheng Zheng, Mengping Wu, Wenyu Wang, Jiangyun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czaf015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study explores the preferences and willingness-to-pay of home-based disabled elderly individuals for long-term care insurance (LTCI) compensation mechanisms in Guangzhou, China, using a discrete choice experiment. The research aims to identify preferred compensation strategies, analyze heterogeneity in preferences, and provide recommendations for policy optimization. Using purposive and cluster sampling, 156 eligible participants were identified, with 96 completing the survey (response rate: 61.5.%). Disabled elderly individuals were defined based on activities of daily living assessments. A conditional Logit model was applied to analyze preferences, and subgroup analyses examined differences by education, gender, activities of daily living status, and caregiving arrangements. Key findings include preferences for medical care over life care, family caregivers over professional ones, and cash subsidies over mixed or proportional reimbursement. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $21.60 for medical care and $25.26 for cash subsidies (1 USD = 7.3 CNY). The average out-of-pocket cost for LTCI services was $27.39 per session, with a sub-average cost of $16.44 for basic care services. Subgroup analyses revealed higher-educated individuals favored medical care, while lower-educated groups prioritized affordability. Severely disabled individuals preferred professional caregivers, such as registered nurses. This study highlights the need to expand medical care services, integrate flexible compensation models, and tailor policies to demographic differences. The findings provide evidence for optimizing China's LTCI system and offer insights for aging populations in low- and middle-income countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"556-565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063582/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用离散选择实验,探讨广州市居家残疾老年人对长期护理保险(LTCI)补偿机制的偏好和支付意愿。本研究旨在识别薪酬偏好策略,分析薪酬偏好的异质性,并为政策优化提供建议。采用有目的和整群抽样,确定了156名符合条件的参与者,其中96人完成了调查(回复率:61.5%)。残疾老年人的定义是基于日常生活评估的活动。采用条件Logit模型分析偏好,亚组分析考察受教育程度、性别、日常生活活动状况和照顾安排的差异。主要发现包括人们对医疗护理的偏好超过对生活护理的偏好,对家庭护理人员的偏好超过对专业护理人员的偏好,对现金补贴的偏好超过对混合或比例报销的偏好。受访者愿意额外支付21.60美元的医疗费用和25.26美元的现金补贴(1美元= 7.3元人民币)。LTCI服务的平均自付费用为每次治疗27.39美元,基本护理服务的次平均费用为16.44美元。亚组分析显示,受教育程度较高的人更喜欢医疗保健,而受教育程度较低的人则优先考虑负担能力。严重残疾的人更喜欢专业护理人员,如注册护士。本研究强调需要扩大医疗服务,整合灵活的补偿模式,并根据人口差异量身定制政策。研究结果为优化中国LTCI体系提供了依据,并为中低收入国家人口老龄化提供了借鉴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Compensation preferences of home-based disabled beneficiaries in the long-term care insurance system in Guangzhou, China.

This study explores the preferences and willingness-to-pay of home-based disabled elderly individuals for long-term care insurance (LTCI) compensation mechanisms in Guangzhou, China, using a discrete choice experiment. The research aims to identify preferred compensation strategies, analyze heterogeneity in preferences, and provide recommendations for policy optimization. Using purposive and cluster sampling, 156 eligible participants were identified, with 96 completing the survey (response rate: 61.5.%). Disabled elderly individuals were defined based on activities of daily living assessments. A conditional Logit model was applied to analyze preferences, and subgroup analyses examined differences by education, gender, activities of daily living status, and caregiving arrangements. Key findings include preferences for medical care over life care, family caregivers over professional ones, and cash subsidies over mixed or proportional reimbursement. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $21.60 for medical care and $25.26 for cash subsidies (1 USD = 7.3 CNY). The average out-of-pocket cost for LTCI services was $27.39 per session, with a sub-average cost of $16.44 for basic care services. Subgroup analyses revealed higher-educated individuals favored medical care, while lower-educated groups prioritized affordability. Severely disabled individuals preferred professional caregivers, such as registered nurses. This study highlights the need to expand medical care services, integrate flexible compensation models, and tailor policies to demographic differences. The findings provide evidence for optimizing China's LTCI system and offer insights for aging populations in low- and middle-income countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信