表观遗传时间对儿童发育结果的影响:来自妊娠和儿童表观遗传学联合会的纵向meta回归研究结果。

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Alexander Neumann, Sara Sammallahti, Marta Cosin-Tomas, Sarah E Reese, Matthew Suderman, Silvia Alemany, Catarina Almqvist, Sandra Andrusaityte, Syed H Arshad, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Lawrence Beilin, Carrie Breton, Mariona Bustamante, Darina Czamara, Dana Dabelea, Celeste Eng, Brenda Eskenazi, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Frank D Gilliland, Regina Grazuleviciene, Siri E Håberg, Gunda Herberth, Nina Holland, Amy Hough, Donglei Hu, Karen Huen, Anke Hüls, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Jianping Jin, Jordi Julvez, Berthold V Koletzko, Gerard H Koppelman, Inger Kull, Xueling Lu, Léa Maitre, Dan Mason, Erik Melén, Simon K Merid, Peter L Molloy, Trevor A Mori, Rosa H Mulder, Christian M Page, Rebecca C Richmond, Stefan Röder, Jason P Ross, Laura Schellhas, Sylvain Sebert, Dean Sheppard, Harold Snieder, Anne P Starling, Dan J Stein, Gwen Tindula, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Judith Vonk, Esther Walton, Jonathan Witonsky, Cheng-Jian Xu, Ivana V Yang, Paul D Yousefi, Heather J Zar, Ana C Zenclussen, Hongmei Zhang, Henning Tiemeier, Stephanie J London, Janine F Felix, Charlotte Cecil
{"title":"表观遗传时间对儿童发育结果的影响:来自妊娠和儿童表观遗传学联合会的纵向meta回归研究结果。","authors":"Alexander Neumann, Sara Sammallahti, Marta Cosin-Tomas, Sarah E Reese, Matthew Suderman, Silvia Alemany, Catarina Almqvist, Sandra Andrusaityte, Syed H Arshad, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Lawrence Beilin, Carrie Breton, Mariona Bustamante, Darina Czamara, Dana Dabelea, Celeste Eng, Brenda Eskenazi, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Frank D Gilliland, Regina Grazuleviciene, Siri E Håberg, Gunda Herberth, Nina Holland, Amy Hough, Donglei Hu, Karen Huen, Anke Hüls, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Jianping Jin, Jordi Julvez, Berthold V Koletzko, Gerard H Koppelman, Inger Kull, Xueling Lu, Léa Maitre, Dan Mason, Erik Melén, Simon K Merid, Peter L Molloy, Trevor A Mori, Rosa H Mulder, Christian M Page, Rebecca C Richmond, Stefan Röder, Jason P Ross, Laura Schellhas, Sylvain Sebert, Dean Sheppard, Harold Snieder, Anne P Starling, Dan J Stein, Gwen Tindula, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Judith Vonk, Esther Walton, Jonathan Witonsky, Cheng-Jian Xu, Ivana V Yang, Paul D Yousefi, Heather J Zar, Ana C Zenclussen, Hongmei Zhang, Henning Tiemeier, Stephanie J London, Janine F Felix, Charlotte Cecil","doi":"10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNA methylation (DNAm) is a developmentally dynamic epigenetic process; yet, most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined DNAm at only one timepoint or without systematic comparisons between timepoints. Thus, it is unclear whether DNAm alterations during certain developmental periods are more informative than others for health outcomes, how persistent epigenetic signals are across time, and whether epigenetic timing effects differ by outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied longitudinal meta-regression models to published meta-analyses from the PACE consortium that examined DNAm at two timepoints-prospectively at birth and cross-sectionally in childhood-in relation to the same child outcome (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, sleep duration, BMI, asthma). These models allowed systematic comparisons of effect sizes and statistical significance between timepoints. Furthermore, we tested correlations between DNAm regression coefficients to assess the consistency of epigenetic signals across time and outcomes. Finally, we performed robustness checks, estimated between-study heterogeneity, and tested pathway enrichment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal three new insights: (i) across outcomes, DNAm effect sizes are consistently larger in childhood cross-sectional analyses compared to prospective analyses at birth; (ii) higher effect sizes do not necessarily translate into more significant findings, as associations also become noisier in childhood for most outcomes (showing larger standard errors in cross-sectional vs prospective analyses); and (iii) DNAm signals are highly time-specific, while also showing evidence of shared associations across health outcomes (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, and asthma). Notably, these observations could not be explained by sample size differences and only partly to differential study-heterogeneity. DNAm sites changing associations were enriched for neural pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight developmentally-specific associations between DNAm and child health outcomes, when assessing DNAm at birth vs childhood. This implies that EWAS results from one timepoint are unlikely to generalize to another. Longitudinal studies with repeated epigenetic assessments are direly needed to shed light on the dynamic relationship between DNAm, development and health, as well as to enable the creation of more reliable and generalizable epigenetic biomarkers. More broadly, this study underscores the importance of considering the time-varying nature of DNAm in epigenetic research and supports the potential existence of epigenetic \"timing effects\" on child health.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epigenetic timing effects on child developmental outcomes: a longitudinal meta-regression of findings from the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics Consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Neumann, Sara Sammallahti, Marta Cosin-Tomas, Sarah E Reese, Matthew Suderman, Silvia Alemany, Catarina Almqvist, Sandra Andrusaityte, Syed H Arshad, Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg, Lawrence Beilin, Carrie Breton, Mariona Bustamante, Darina Czamara, Dana Dabelea, Celeste Eng, Brenda Eskenazi, Bernard F Fuemmeler, Frank D Gilliland, Regina Grazuleviciene, Siri E Håberg, Gunda Herberth, Nina Holland, Amy Hough, Donglei Hu, Karen Huen, Anke Hüls, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Jianping Jin, Jordi Julvez, Berthold V Koletzko, Gerard H Koppelman, Inger Kull, Xueling Lu, Léa Maitre, Dan Mason, Erik Melén, Simon K Merid, Peter L Molloy, Trevor A Mori, Rosa H Mulder, Christian M Page, Rebecca C Richmond, Stefan Röder, Jason P Ross, Laura Schellhas, Sylvain Sebert, Dean Sheppard, Harold Snieder, Anne P Starling, Dan J Stein, Gwen Tindula, Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Judith Vonk, Esther Walton, Jonathan Witonsky, Cheng-Jian Xu, Ivana V Yang, Paul D Yousefi, Heather J Zar, Ana C Zenclussen, Hongmei Zhang, Henning Tiemeier, Stephanie J London, Janine F Felix, Charlotte Cecil\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DNA methylation (DNAm) is a developmentally dynamic epigenetic process; yet, most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined DNAm at only one timepoint or without systematic comparisons between timepoints. Thus, it is unclear whether DNAm alterations during certain developmental periods are more informative than others for health outcomes, how persistent epigenetic signals are across time, and whether epigenetic timing effects differ by outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied longitudinal meta-regression models to published meta-analyses from the PACE consortium that examined DNAm at two timepoints-prospectively at birth and cross-sectionally in childhood-in relation to the same child outcome (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, sleep duration, BMI, asthma). These models allowed systematic comparisons of effect sizes and statistical significance between timepoints. Furthermore, we tested correlations between DNAm regression coefficients to assess the consistency of epigenetic signals across time and outcomes. Finally, we performed robustness checks, estimated between-study heterogeneity, and tested pathway enrichment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal three new insights: (i) across outcomes, DNAm effect sizes are consistently larger in childhood cross-sectional analyses compared to prospective analyses at birth; (ii) higher effect sizes do not necessarily translate into more significant findings, as associations also become noisier in childhood for most outcomes (showing larger standard errors in cross-sectional vs prospective analyses); and (iii) DNAm signals are highly time-specific, while also showing evidence of shared associations across health outcomes (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, and asthma). Notably, these observations could not be explained by sample size differences and only partly to differential study-heterogeneity. DNAm sites changing associations were enriched for neural pathways.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight developmentally-specific associations between DNAm and child health outcomes, when assessing DNAm at birth vs childhood. This implies that EWAS results from one timepoint are unlikely to generalize to another. Longitudinal studies with repeated epigenetic assessments are direly needed to shed light on the dynamic relationship between DNAm, development and health, as well as to enable the creation of more reliable and generalizable epigenetic biomarkers. More broadly, this study underscores the importance of considering the time-varying nature of DNAm in epigenetic research and supports the potential existence of epigenetic \\\"timing effects\\\" on child health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-025-01451-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:DNA甲基化(DNAm)是一个发育动态的表观遗传过程;然而,大多数表观基因组关联研究(EWAS)只在一个时间点检查了dna,或者没有在时间点之间进行系统的比较。因此,目前尚不清楚某些发育时期的dna改变是否比其他时期更能提供健康结果的信息,表观遗传信号在时间上的持久性如何,以及表观遗传时间效应是否因结果而异。方法:我们将纵向元回归模型应用于来自PACE联盟的已发表的荟萃分析,该荟萃分析在两个时间点(出生时的前瞻性和儿童期的横断面性)与相同的儿童结局(ADHD症状、一般精神病理、睡眠时间、BMI、哮喘)相关。这些模型允许系统地比较时间点之间的效应大小和统计显著性。此外,我们测试了DNAm回归系数之间的相关性,以评估表观遗传信号在时间和结果上的一致性。最后,我们进行了稳健性检查,估计了研究间的异质性,并测试了途径富集。结果:我们的研究结果揭示了三个新的见解:(i)与出生时的前瞻性分析相比,童年横断面分析中的DNAm效应量始终更大;(ii)较高的效应量并不一定转化为更显著的发现,因为大多数结果的关联在童年时期也变得更嘈杂(在横断面分析与前瞻性分析中显示出更大的标准误差);(iii) DNAm信号具有高度的时间特异性,同时也显示出各种健康结果(ADHD症状、一般精神病理和哮喘)之间的共同关联。值得注意的是,这些观察结果不能用样本量差异来解释,只能部分地解释差异研究异质性。DNAm位点改变的关联在神经通路中丰富。结论:当评估出生时与儿童期的dna缺失时,我们的结果强调了dna缺失与儿童健康结局之间的发育特异性关联。这意味着一个时间点的EWAS结果不太可能推广到另一个时间点。迫切需要进行具有重复表观遗传评估的纵向研究,以阐明DNAm、发育和健康之间的动态关系,并使创建更可靠和可推广的表观遗传生物标志物成为可能。更广泛地说,这项研究强调了在表观遗传研究中考虑dna时变性质的重要性,并支持表观遗传“时间效应”对儿童健康的潜在存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epigenetic timing effects on child developmental outcomes: a longitudinal meta-regression of findings from the Pregnancy And Childhood Epigenetics Consortium.

Background: DNA methylation (DNAm) is a developmentally dynamic epigenetic process; yet, most epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have examined DNAm at only one timepoint or without systematic comparisons between timepoints. Thus, it is unclear whether DNAm alterations during certain developmental periods are more informative than others for health outcomes, how persistent epigenetic signals are across time, and whether epigenetic timing effects differ by outcome.

Methods: We applied longitudinal meta-regression models to published meta-analyses from the PACE consortium that examined DNAm at two timepoints-prospectively at birth and cross-sectionally in childhood-in relation to the same child outcome (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, sleep duration, BMI, asthma). These models allowed systematic comparisons of effect sizes and statistical significance between timepoints. Furthermore, we tested correlations between DNAm regression coefficients to assess the consistency of epigenetic signals across time and outcomes. Finally, we performed robustness checks, estimated between-study heterogeneity, and tested pathway enrichment.

Results: Our findings reveal three new insights: (i) across outcomes, DNAm effect sizes are consistently larger in childhood cross-sectional analyses compared to prospective analyses at birth; (ii) higher effect sizes do not necessarily translate into more significant findings, as associations also become noisier in childhood for most outcomes (showing larger standard errors in cross-sectional vs prospective analyses); and (iii) DNAm signals are highly time-specific, while also showing evidence of shared associations across health outcomes (ADHD symptoms, general psychopathology, and asthma). Notably, these observations could not be explained by sample size differences and only partly to differential study-heterogeneity. DNAm sites changing associations were enriched for neural pathways.

Conclusions: Our results highlight developmentally-specific associations between DNAm and child health outcomes, when assessing DNAm at birth vs childhood. This implies that EWAS results from one timepoint are unlikely to generalize to another. Longitudinal studies with repeated epigenetic assessments are direly needed to shed light on the dynamic relationship between DNAm, development and health, as well as to enable the creation of more reliable and generalizable epigenetic biomarkers. More broadly, this study underscores the importance of considering the time-varying nature of DNAm in epigenetic research and supports the potential existence of epigenetic "timing effects" on child health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信