全球专家对当今人火相互作用的启发。

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Cathy Smith, Ol Perkins, Jayalaxshmi Mistry, Bibiana A Bilbao, Rebecca Bliege Bird, Amy Cardinal Christianson, Kayla Maria de Freitas, Wolfram Dressler, Erle C Ellis, Ludivine Eloy, Cynthia Fowler, Simon Haberle, Jed O Kaplan, Paul Laris, James Millington, Claudia Monzón-Alvarado
{"title":"全球专家对当今人火相互作用的启发。","authors":"Cathy Smith, Ol Perkins, Jayalaxshmi Mistry, Bibiana A Bilbao, Rebecca Bliege Bird, Amy Cardinal Christianson, Kayla Maria de Freitas, Wolfram Dressler, Erle C Ellis, Ludivine Eloy, Cynthia Fowler, Simon Haberle, Jed O Kaplan, Paul Laris, James Millington, Claudia Monzón-Alvarado","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1924","pages":"20230463"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004094/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Cathy Smith, Ol Perkins, Jayalaxshmi Mistry, Bibiana A Bilbao, Rebecca Bliege Bird, Amy Cardinal Christianson, Kayla Maria de Freitas, Wolfram Dressler, Erle C Ellis, Ludivine Eloy, Cynthia Fowler, Simon Haberle, Jed O Kaplan, Paul Laris, James Millington, Claudia Monzón-Alvarado\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rstb.2023.0463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"380 1924\",\"pages\":\"20230463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004094/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0463\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类对火的使用有助于建立火灾制度,并使全世界的社会受益,但在全球范围内却知之甚少。我们提出了全球消防使用调查(GFUS),旨在从包括学者和从业人员在内的专家那里引出和系统化有关消防使用的知识。GFUS数据涵盖了使用火的利益相关者、燃烧的原因和季节性、人为点火和燃烧面积的近期趋势,以及针对火使用的不同政策干预措施的存在/缺失和有效性。该调查获得了311份回复,覆盖了地球上超过50%的无冰土地,提高了关于火灾利用的文献综合的覆盖率。在这里,我们分析了有关火灾使用分布和政策干预的数据。调查表明,最普遍的火灾使用者是土著和当地居民,他们燃烧以实现与小规模生计和文化优先事项相关的目标,而商业土地使用者、国家机构和非政府组织的燃烧则不那么普遍。管制限制是针对火灾使用的最常见的政策干预措施,但在火灾面积较大的地区实现其目标是无效的。虽然社区主导的焚烧治理较为罕见,但它被认为比限制性政策干预更有效,特别是在焚烧面积较大的地区。本文是“气候变化和人类影响下的新型火灾制度:影响、生态系统响应和反馈”主题的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions.

A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions.

A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions.

A global expert elicitation on present-day human-fire interactions.

Human fire use contributes to fire regimes and benefits societies worldwide yet is poorly understood at the global scale. We present the Global Fire Use Survey (GFUS), an effort to elicit and systematize knowledge about fire use from experts, including academics and practitioners. The GFUS data cover the stakeholders using fire, reasons for and seasonality of burning, recent trends in anthropogenic ignitions and burned area and the presence/absence and effectiveness of different policy interventions targeting fire use. The survey garnered 311 responses for regions covering over 50% of the Earth's ice-free land, improving on the coverage of literature syntheses on fire use. Here, we analyse the data on the distribution of fire use and policy interventions. The survey suggests that the most widespread fire users are Indigenous and local people burning to meet objectives associated with small-scale livelihoods and cultural priorities, whereas burning by commercial land users, state agencies and non-governmental organizations is less widespread. Regulatory restrictions are the most common policy interventions targeting fire use but are ineffective in achieving their aims in regions with higher burned area. While community-led governance of burning is rarer, it was deemed more effective than restrictive policy interventions, particularly in regions with higher burned area.This article is part of the theme issue 'Novel fire regimes under climate changes and human influences: impacts, ecosystem responses and feedbacks'.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信