{"title":"辅助多西紫杉醇与监测在中度或高危前列腺癌根治性放疗后:SPCG-13试验的最终生存结果","authors":"Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Ann-Sofie Fransson, Timo Marttila, Ilari Lehtinen, Teppo Huttunen, Camilla Thellenberg-Karlsson","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SPCG-13 trial investigated whether six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel (aDoc) improves survival in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer after radical curative radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. There was no difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival (primary endpoint) at 5-yr between the surveillance (SV) and aDoc arms. Here we report 10-yr survival data (planned secondary endpoint). Updated overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival data were available for 233 patients. There were no demographic differences between the original randomized cohort and the 10-yr survival population. Thus, this 10-yr sample is deemed representative of the original patient population. Median OS was 14.5 yr in the SV and was not reached in the aDoc arm. No significant difference in Kaplan-Meier survival emerged between the arms over time (log-rank test p = 0.154). Estimates of the 10-yr OS rate favored aDoc (77.4% vs 66.8%). Cox regression analysis revealed a trend towards worse OS for patients with a high Gleason score (GS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.925, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.213-3.053; p = 0.005). A Cox model adjusted for GS risk revealed an OS HR of 0.776 (95% CI 0.508-1.187; p = 0.242) for aDoc versus SV. In conclusion, aDoc was associated with a slight, but not statistically significant, improvement in 10-yr OS, especially in the high-GS group. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our 10-year survival analysis for the SPCG-13 trial showed that six cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel after radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer did not significantly increase survival. Survival was worse for cancers with a high Gleason score, so docetaxel could be considered after a careful discussion of the benefits and harms of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to investigate options for this group of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Docetaxel Versus Surveillance in Intermediate- or High-risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Curative Radiotherapy: Final Survival Results from the SPCG-13 Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Ann-Sofie Fransson, Timo Marttila, Ilari Lehtinen, Teppo Huttunen, Camilla Thellenberg-Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The SPCG-13 trial investigated whether six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel (aDoc) improves survival in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer after radical curative radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. There was no difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival (primary endpoint) at 5-yr between the surveillance (SV) and aDoc arms. Here we report 10-yr survival data (planned secondary endpoint). Updated overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival data were available for 233 patients. There were no demographic differences between the original randomized cohort and the 10-yr survival population. Thus, this 10-yr sample is deemed representative of the original patient population. Median OS was 14.5 yr in the SV and was not reached in the aDoc arm. No significant difference in Kaplan-Meier survival emerged between the arms over time (log-rank test p = 0.154). Estimates of the 10-yr OS rate favored aDoc (77.4% vs 66.8%). Cox regression analysis revealed a trend towards worse OS for patients with a high Gleason score (GS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.925, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.213-3.053; p = 0.005). A Cox model adjusted for GS risk revealed an OS HR of 0.776 (95% CI 0.508-1.187; p = 0.242) for aDoc versus SV. In conclusion, aDoc was associated with a slight, but not statistically significant, improvement in 10-yr OS, especially in the high-GS group. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our 10-year survival analysis for the SPCG-13 trial showed that six cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel after radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer did not significantly increase survival. Survival was worse for cancers with a high Gleason score, so docetaxel could be considered after a careful discussion of the benefits and harms of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to investigate options for this group of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.013\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.04.013","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adjuvant Docetaxel Versus Surveillance in Intermediate- or High-risk Prostate Cancer After Radical Curative Radiotherapy: Final Survival Results from the SPCG-13 Trial.
The SPCG-13 trial investigated whether six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel (aDoc) improves survival in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer after radical curative radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. There was no difference in biochemical recurrence-free survival (primary endpoint) at 5-yr between the surveillance (SV) and aDoc arms. Here we report 10-yr survival data (planned secondary endpoint). Updated overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival data were available for 233 patients. There were no demographic differences between the original randomized cohort and the 10-yr survival population. Thus, this 10-yr sample is deemed representative of the original patient population. Median OS was 14.5 yr in the SV and was not reached in the aDoc arm. No significant difference in Kaplan-Meier survival emerged between the arms over time (log-rank test p = 0.154). Estimates of the 10-yr OS rate favored aDoc (77.4% vs 66.8%). Cox regression analysis revealed a trend towards worse OS for patients with a high Gleason score (GS; hazard ratio [HR] 1.925, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.213-3.053; p = 0.005). A Cox model adjusted for GS risk revealed an OS HR of 0.776 (95% CI 0.508-1.187; p = 0.242) for aDoc versus SV. In conclusion, aDoc was associated with a slight, but not statistically significant, improvement in 10-yr OS, especially in the high-GS group. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our 10-year survival analysis for the SPCG-13 trial showed that six cycles of chemotherapy with docetaxel after radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer did not significantly increase survival. Survival was worse for cancers with a high Gleason score, so docetaxel could be considered after a careful discussion of the benefits and harms of chemotherapy. Further trials are needed to investigate options for this group of patients.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format