经验性免疫治疗对高度难治性慢性癫痫患者癫痫发作控制的持续抢救。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1111/epi.18417
Elisabeth Doran, Albert Kelly, Raluca Stanila, Laura Healy, Colin P Doherty
{"title":"经验性免疫治疗对高度难治性慢性癫痫患者癫痫发作控制的持续抢救。","authors":"Elisabeth Doran, Albert Kelly, Raluca Stanila, Laura Healy, Colin P Doherty","doi":"10.1111/epi.18417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Following emerging evidence of autoimmune-associated seizures in medication-refractory epilepsy, we began offering a trial of immunotherapy to selected patients. Here, we review this approach's treatment response, predictive clinical features, and utility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center cohort study (2018-2022) of empiric, palliative immunotherapy in 31 adults with highly refractory, highly active epilepsy. Since 2018, in line with the International League Against Epilepsy's addition of \"immune\" as an etiology in the Classification of Epilepsy, we initiated immunotherapy after comprehensive antiseizure medication failures while at the same time screening for an autoimmune origin. The workup included assessing clinical features, serum autoantibody testing, cerebrospinal fluid testing (where feasible), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalography. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone or IV immunoglobulin according to previously published protocols, and follow-up was for at least 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients (29%) in this highly refractory cohort demonstrated a sustained treatment response, measured as a greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency for at least 12 months. Three patients (10%) became seizure-free. Six patients (20%) were classified as partial responders and experienced an initial response that was not sustained. Apart from a trend toward a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, we did not identify any specific serological, clinical, electrodiagnostic, or imaging features with statistical significance that were predictive of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This patient group demonstrated a reasonable response rate to an immunotherapy trial. These findings are surprising but support the consideration of an immunotherapy trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Requirements for repeated courses of immunotherapy differed significantly between patients, and this is an area of interest for further research. The basis for response in this cohort remains unclear; in some cases, antiseizure medication changes may have contributed; however, without any apparent autoimmune features, we consider potential blood-brain barrier repair or a placebo effect as hypothetical alternative mechanisms of action for the response to immunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustained rescue of seizure control in patients with highly refractory chronic epilepsy using empiric immunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Doran, Albert Kelly, Raluca Stanila, Laura Healy, Colin P Doherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Following emerging evidence of autoimmune-associated seizures in medication-refractory epilepsy, we began offering a trial of immunotherapy to selected patients. Here, we review this approach's treatment response, predictive clinical features, and utility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center cohort study (2018-2022) of empiric, palliative immunotherapy in 31 adults with highly refractory, highly active epilepsy. Since 2018, in line with the International League Against Epilepsy's addition of \\\"immune\\\" as an etiology in the Classification of Epilepsy, we initiated immunotherapy after comprehensive antiseizure medication failures while at the same time screening for an autoimmune origin. The workup included assessing clinical features, serum autoantibody testing, cerebrospinal fluid testing (where feasible), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalography. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone or IV immunoglobulin according to previously published protocols, and follow-up was for at least 12 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients (29%) in this highly refractory cohort demonstrated a sustained treatment response, measured as a greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency for at least 12 months. Three patients (10%) became seizure-free. Six patients (20%) were classified as partial responders and experienced an initial response that was not sustained. Apart from a trend toward a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, we did not identify any specific serological, clinical, electrodiagnostic, or imaging features with statistical significance that were predictive of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This patient group demonstrated a reasonable response rate to an immunotherapy trial. These findings are surprising but support the consideration of an immunotherapy trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Requirements for repeated courses of immunotherapy differed significantly between patients, and this is an area of interest for further research. The basis for response in this cohort remains unclear; in some cases, antiseizure medication changes may have contributed; however, without any apparent autoimmune features, we consider potential blood-brain barrier repair or a placebo effect as hypothetical alternative mechanisms of action for the response to immunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18417\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18417","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在药物难治性癫痫中出现自身免疫相关癫痫发作的新证据后,我们开始对选定的患者进行免疫治疗试验。在这里,我们回顾了这种方法的治疗反应、预测性临床特征和实用性。方法:这是一项回顾性单中心队列研究(2018-2022),对31例高度难治性、高度活动性癫痫的成人进行经验性姑息性免疫治疗。自2018年以来,根据国际抗癫痫联盟在癫痫分类中增加的“免疫”作为病因,我们在综合抗癫痫药物失败后启动免疫治疗,同时筛查自身免疫来源。检查包括评估临床特征、血清自身抗体检测、脑脊液检测(如可行)、磁共振成像(MRI)和脑电图。根据先前公布的方案,所有患者均接受静脉注射甲基强的松龙或静脉注射免疫球蛋白,随访至少12个月。结果:在这个高度难治性队列中,9名患者(29%)表现出持续的治疗反应,癫痫发作频率改善超过50%,持续至少12个月。3例(10%)患者无癫痫发作。6名患者(20%)被归类为部分缓解者,经历了最初的缓解,但没有持续。除了局灶性癫痫的诊断趋势外,我们没有发现任何特定的血清学、临床、电诊断或影像学特征具有统计学意义,可以预测治疗反应。意义:该患者组在免疫治疗试验中表现出合理的应答率。这些发现令人惊讶,但支持对难治性癫痫患者进行免疫治疗试验的考虑。不同患者对重复疗程免疫治疗的要求有显著差异,这是一个值得进一步研究的领域。该队列的反应基础尚不清楚;在某些情况下,抗癫痫药物的改变可能有所贡献;然而,由于没有任何明显的自身免疫特征,我们考虑潜在的血脑屏障修复或安慰剂效应作为免疫治疗反应的假设替代机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustained rescue of seizure control in patients with highly refractory chronic epilepsy using empiric immunotherapy.

Objective: Following emerging evidence of autoimmune-associated seizures in medication-refractory epilepsy, we began offering a trial of immunotherapy to selected patients. Here, we review this approach's treatment response, predictive clinical features, and utility.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center cohort study (2018-2022) of empiric, palliative immunotherapy in 31 adults with highly refractory, highly active epilepsy. Since 2018, in line with the International League Against Epilepsy's addition of "immune" as an etiology in the Classification of Epilepsy, we initiated immunotherapy after comprehensive antiseizure medication failures while at the same time screening for an autoimmune origin. The workup included assessing clinical features, serum autoantibody testing, cerebrospinal fluid testing (where feasible), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electroencephalography. All patients received intravenous methylprednisolone or IV immunoglobulin according to previously published protocols, and follow-up was for at least 12 months.

Results: Nine patients (29%) in this highly refractory cohort demonstrated a sustained treatment response, measured as a greater than 50% improvement in seizure frequency for at least 12 months. Three patients (10%) became seizure-free. Six patients (20%) were classified as partial responders and experienced an initial response that was not sustained. Apart from a trend toward a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, we did not identify any specific serological, clinical, electrodiagnostic, or imaging features with statistical significance that were predictive of treatment response.

Significance: This patient group demonstrated a reasonable response rate to an immunotherapy trial. These findings are surprising but support the consideration of an immunotherapy trial in patients with refractory epilepsy. Requirements for repeated courses of immunotherapy differed significantly between patients, and this is an area of interest for further research. The basis for response in this cohort remains unclear; in some cases, antiseizure medication changes may have contributed; however, without any apparent autoimmune features, we consider potential blood-brain barrier repair or a placebo effect as hypothetical alternative mechanisms of action for the response to immunotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信