Sayaka Obayashi, Mayu Aoki, Keiko Tanabe, Yuko Nakazawa, Misato Ogino, Takaaki Fujii, Ken Shirabe
{"title":"BRCA1/2基因检测在围手术期乳腺癌管理中的作用:促进共同决策和个性化护理","authors":"Sayaka Obayashi, Mayu Aoki, Keiko Tanabe, Yuko Nakazawa, Misato Ogino, Takaaki Fujii, Ken Shirabe","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02773-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BRCA1/2 genetic testing has become essential in breast cancer management, guiding surgical decisions, surveillance, and targeted therapies. While it has revolutionized personalized medicine, challenges remain in its implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review summarizes the impacts of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on surgical choices and risk-reducing strategies, plus its role in the therapy of PARP inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed recent studies, clinical guidelines, and meta-analyses focusing on the clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in breast cancer management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) does not conclusively impact survival in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, making it a viable option for those preferring breast conservation. The benefit of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy remains uncertain, but it may be considered if the patient understands the risks and benefits. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy effectively prevents ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and improves survival. MRI is superior to mammography for early cancer detection in high-risk women and is beneficial for surveillance when contralateral mastectomy is not performed. BRCA1/2 testing is also essential for determining eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy, particularly olaparib, which has shown efficacy in early breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in the OlympiA trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRCA1/2 genetic testing enhances personalized breast cancer treatment but presents challenges in patient selection, decision-making, genetic counseling, and insurance coverage. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for shared decision-making and improved outcomes in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1890-1895"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in perioperative breast cancer management: advancing shared decision-making and personalized care.\",\"authors\":\"Sayaka Obayashi, Mayu Aoki, Keiko Tanabe, Yuko Nakazawa, Misato Ogino, Takaaki Fujii, Ken Shirabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02773-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>BRCA1/2 genetic testing has become essential in breast cancer management, guiding surgical decisions, surveillance, and targeted therapies. While it has revolutionized personalized medicine, challenges remain in its implementation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review summarizes the impacts of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on surgical choices and risk-reducing strategies, plus its role in the therapy of PARP inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed recent studies, clinical guidelines, and meta-analyses focusing on the clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in breast cancer management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) does not conclusively impact survival in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, making it a viable option for those preferring breast conservation. The benefit of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy remains uncertain, but it may be considered if the patient understands the risks and benefits. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy effectively prevents ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and improves survival. MRI is superior to mammography for early cancer detection in high-risk women and is beneficial for surveillance when contralateral mastectomy is not performed. BRCA1/2 testing is also essential for determining eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy, particularly olaparib, which has shown efficacy in early breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in the OlympiA trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BRCA1/2 genetic testing enhances personalized breast cancer treatment but presents challenges in patient selection, decision-making, genetic counseling, and insurance coverage. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for shared decision-making and improved outcomes in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1890-1895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02773-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02773-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The role of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in perioperative breast cancer management: advancing shared decision-making and personalized care.
Background: BRCA1/2 genetic testing has become essential in breast cancer management, guiding surgical decisions, surveillance, and targeted therapies. While it has revolutionized personalized medicine, challenges remain in its implementation.
Objective: This review summarizes the impacts of BRCA1/2 genetic testing on surgical choices and risk-reducing strategies, plus its role in the therapy of PARP inhibitors.
Methods: We analyzed recent studies, clinical guidelines, and meta-analyses focusing on the clinical utility of BRCA1/2 genetic testing in breast cancer management.
Results: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) does not conclusively impact survival in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, making it a viable option for those preferring breast conservation. The benefit of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy remains uncertain, but it may be considered if the patient understands the risks and benefits. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy effectively prevents ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and improves survival. MRI is superior to mammography for early cancer detection in high-risk women and is beneficial for surveillance when contralateral mastectomy is not performed. BRCA1/2 testing is also essential for determining eligibility for PARP inhibitor therapy, particularly olaparib, which has shown efficacy in early breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in the OlympiA trial.
Conclusion: BRCA1/2 genetic testing enhances personalized breast cancer treatment but presents challenges in patient selection, decision-making, genetic counseling, and insurance coverage. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for shared decision-making and improved outcomes in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.