详细的乙苯危害评估,以建立日本室内空气质量指南。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kaoru Inoue, Yoko Hirabayashi, Kenichi Azuma
{"title":"详细的乙苯危害评估,以建立日本室内空气质量指南。","authors":"Kaoru Inoue, Yoko Hirabayashi, Kenichi Azuma","doi":"10.1265/ehpm.24-00415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indoor air quality (IAQ) is an important determinant of human health. In Japan, IAQ guidelines have been established for 13 chemicals since 1997. Regarding ethylbenzene (EB), a previous guideline value of 3800 µg/m<sup>3</sup> was established in 2000. However, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare decided to revise the value because of the publication of new hazard information after the establishment of the previous guideline value and the establishment of their respective IAQ guidelines by foreign organizations based on the new hazard information. This study conducted a detailed hazard assessment on EB and derived hazard assessment values to provide a toxicologically valid basis for revising the IAQ guideline value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As it was defined that the IAQ guidelines would not exert adverse health effects on humans even if they inhaled the chemicals from indoor air over a lifetime, we investigated the general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of EB based on reliable hazard information cited in published assessment documents by domestic, foreign, or international risk assessment organizations. All the collected hazard information was examined, and we originally judged the no-observed adverse effect level and the lowest observed adverse effect level of each toxicity study. We then selected the most appropriate key study, an endpoint, and a point of departure and derived the hazard assessment values for each toxicity category. Finally, we selected a representative hazard assessment value for EB from the minimum hazard assessment value among general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three toxicity categories, the minimum hazard assessment value was obtained from general toxicity, which was 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) based on the loss of the outer hair cells in the organ of Corti in the cochlea observed in a 13-week repeated-dose inhalation toxicity study using rats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It would be appropriate to adopt 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) as a representative hazard assessment value to provide a basis for revising the IAQ guideline value for EB.</p>","PeriodicalId":11707,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","volume":"30 ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detailed hazard assessment of ethylbenzene to establish an indoor air quality guideline in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Kaoru Inoue, Yoko Hirabayashi, Kenichi Azuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1265/ehpm.24-00415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Indoor air quality (IAQ) is an important determinant of human health. In Japan, IAQ guidelines have been established for 13 chemicals since 1997. Regarding ethylbenzene (EB), a previous guideline value of 3800 µg/m<sup>3</sup> was established in 2000. However, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare decided to revise the value because of the publication of new hazard information after the establishment of the previous guideline value and the establishment of their respective IAQ guidelines by foreign organizations based on the new hazard information. This study conducted a detailed hazard assessment on EB and derived hazard assessment values to provide a toxicologically valid basis for revising the IAQ guideline value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As it was defined that the IAQ guidelines would not exert adverse health effects on humans even if they inhaled the chemicals from indoor air over a lifetime, we investigated the general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of EB based on reliable hazard information cited in published assessment documents by domestic, foreign, or international risk assessment organizations. All the collected hazard information was examined, and we originally judged the no-observed adverse effect level and the lowest observed adverse effect level of each toxicity study. We then selected the most appropriate key study, an endpoint, and a point of departure and derived the hazard assessment values for each toxicity category. Finally, we selected a representative hazard assessment value for EB from the minimum hazard assessment value among general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the three toxicity categories, the minimum hazard assessment value was obtained from general toxicity, which was 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) based on the loss of the outer hair cells in the organ of Corti in the cochlea observed in a 13-week repeated-dose inhalation toxicity study using rats.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It would be appropriate to adopt 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m<sup>3</sup>) as a representative hazard assessment value to provide a basis for revising the IAQ guideline value for EB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"30 \",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.24-00415\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.24-00415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:室内空气质量(IAQ)是人类健康的重要决定因素。自1997年以来,日本已经为13种化学品制定了室内空气质量准则。关于乙苯(EB), 2000年制定了3800µg/m3的先前指导值。但是,厚生劳动省决定修改这一数值,因为在确定了先前的指导值和外国组织根据新的危害信息制定了各自的室内空气质量指南之后,又公布了新的危害信息。本研究对EB进行了详细的危害评价,并推导出危害评价值,为修订室内空气质量指标值提供了毒理学依据。方法:根据《室内空气质量指南》规定,即使人体终生吸入室内空气中的化学物质,也不会对人体健康产生不良影响,根据国内外风险评估机构发表的评估文件中引用的可靠危害信息,对EB的一般毒性、发育和生殖毒性、遗传毒性和致癌性进行了调查。对收集到的所有危害信息进行了检查,我们最初判断了每个毒性研究的未观察到的不良反应水平和最低观察到的不良反应水平。然后,我们选择了最合适的关键研究、终点和出发点,并得出了每种毒性类别的危害评估值。最后,从一般毒性、发育和生殖毒性、致癌性的最小危害评价值中选择具有代表性的EB危害评价值。结果:在3个毒性类别中,根据13周大鼠重复剂量吸入毒性研究中观察到的耳蜗Corti器官外毛细胞的损失,一般毒性的危害评估值最小,为0.0858 ppm(370µg/m3)。结论:采用0.0858 ppm(370µg/m3)作为具有代表性的危害评价值,为修订EB室内空气质量指标值提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detailed hazard assessment of ethylbenzene to establish an indoor air quality guideline in Japan.

Background: Indoor air quality (IAQ) is an important determinant of human health. In Japan, IAQ guidelines have been established for 13 chemicals since 1997. Regarding ethylbenzene (EB), a previous guideline value of 3800 µg/m3 was established in 2000. However, the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare decided to revise the value because of the publication of new hazard information after the establishment of the previous guideline value and the establishment of their respective IAQ guidelines by foreign organizations based on the new hazard information. This study conducted a detailed hazard assessment on EB and derived hazard assessment values to provide a toxicologically valid basis for revising the IAQ guideline value.

Methods: As it was defined that the IAQ guidelines would not exert adverse health effects on humans even if they inhaled the chemicals from indoor air over a lifetime, we investigated the general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, genotoxicity, and carcinogenicity of EB based on reliable hazard information cited in published assessment documents by domestic, foreign, or international risk assessment organizations. All the collected hazard information was examined, and we originally judged the no-observed adverse effect level and the lowest observed adverse effect level of each toxicity study. We then selected the most appropriate key study, an endpoint, and a point of departure and derived the hazard assessment values for each toxicity category. Finally, we selected a representative hazard assessment value for EB from the minimum hazard assessment value among general toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, and carcinogenicity.

Results: Among the three toxicity categories, the minimum hazard assessment value was obtained from general toxicity, which was 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m3) based on the loss of the outer hair cells in the organ of Corti in the cochlea observed in a 13-week repeated-dose inhalation toxicity study using rats.

Conclusions: It would be appropriate to adopt 0.0858 ppm (370 µg/m3) as a representative hazard assessment value to provide a basis for revising the IAQ guideline value for EB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese Society for Hygiene, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine (EHPM) brings a comprehensive approach to prevention and environmental health related to medical, biological, molecular biological, genetic, physical, psychosocial, chemical, and other environmental factors. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine features definitive studies on human health sciences and provides comprehensive and unique information to a worldwide readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信