Rasmus Bruhn, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Anne Heltborg, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Antoni Torres, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares
{"title":"急诊感染诊断的生物标志物分析：一项评估c反应蛋白、降钙素原、俱乐部细胞蛋白16、白介素-6、几丁质酶样蛋白和可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体的诊断研究。","authors":"Rasmus Bruhn, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Anne Heltborg, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Antoni Torres, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing infections in emergency departments (EDs) is vital for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of six inflammatory biomarkers-CC16, CRP, IL-6, PCT, suPAR, and YKL-40-in ED patients with suspected infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Adult patients suspected of infections at four Danish EDs were included. We measured biomarker levels at admission and analyzed their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 966 patients, with 789 (81.7%) confirmed infections. CRP, IL-6, and PCT demonstrated the highest positive predictive values, recorded at 93% (95% CI, 91-95), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 91% (95% CI, 88-93), respectively. However, the negative predictive values of these markers were low, at 35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5), 38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3) and 34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9) respectively at Youden Index. CRP, IL-6, and PCT were the most predictive, with CRP demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. IL-6 and PCT showed similar levels of accuracy. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 displayed AUCs in the range of 0.53-0.64. CRP levels peaked three days after symptoms appeared, whereas PCT levels were highest upon symptom onset and admission. The influence of fever enhanced the sensitivity of IL-6 and PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10172,"journal":{"name":"Clinical biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"110943"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor.\",\"authors\":\"Rasmus Bruhn, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Thor Aage Skovsted, Claus Lohman Brasen, Eline Sandvig Andersen, Anne Heltborg, Mathias Amdi Hertz, Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Christian Backer Mogensen, Antoni Torres, Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosing infections in emergency departments (EDs) is vital for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of six inflammatory biomarkers-CC16, CRP, IL-6, PCT, suPAR, and YKL-40-in ED patients with suspected infections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Adult patients suspected of infections at four Danish EDs were included. We measured biomarker levels at admission and analyzed their diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 966 patients, with 789 (81.7%) confirmed infections. CRP, IL-6, and PCT demonstrated the highest positive predictive values, recorded at 93% (95% CI, 91-95), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 91% (95% CI, 88-93), respectively. However, the negative predictive values of these markers were low, at 35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5), 38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3) and 34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9) respectively at Youden Index. CRP, IL-6, and PCT were the most predictive, with CRP demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. IL-6 and PCT showed similar levels of accuracy. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 displayed AUCs in the range of 0.53-0.64. CRP levels peaked three days after symptoms appeared, whereas PCT levels were highest upon symptom onset and admission. The influence of fever enhanced the sensitivity of IL-6 and PCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2025.110943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomarker profiling for infection diagnosis in emergency departments: A diagnostic study evaluating C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, Club Cell Protein 16, interleukin-6, chitinase-like protein, and soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor.
Introduction: Diagnosing infections in emergency departments (EDs) is vital for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of six inflammatory biomarkers-CC16, CRP, IL-6, PCT, suPAR, and YKL-40-in ED patients with suspected infections.
Materials and methods: This was a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Adult patients suspected of infections at four Danish EDs were included. We measured biomarker levels at admission and analyzed their diagnostic performance.
Results: The study included 966 patients, with 789 (81.7%) confirmed infections. CRP, IL-6, and PCT demonstrated the highest positive predictive values, recorded at 93% (95% CI, 91-95), 92% (95% CI, 90-94), and 91% (95% CI, 88-93), respectively. However, the negative predictive values of these markers were low, at 35.5 (95% CI, 30.8-40.5), 38.3 (95% CI, 32.5-44.3) and 34.2 (95% CI, 28.9-39.9) respectively at Youden Index. CRP, IL-6, and PCT were the most predictive, with CRP demonstrating an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.79. IL-6 and PCT showed similar levels of accuracy. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 displayed AUCs in the range of 0.53-0.64. CRP levels peaked three days after symptoms appeared, whereas PCT levels were highest upon symptom onset and admission. The influence of fever enhanced the sensitivity of IL-6 and PCT.
Conclusion: CRP, IL-6, and PCT showed the best diagnostic accuracy among the biomarkers tested but are influenced by the timing of symptom onset and fever presence. CC16, suPAR, and YKL-40 had poor diagnostic accuracy and were considered poor discriminators. Overall, no single biomarker was sufficient to conclusively rule in or rule out infection. These findings support the need for nuanced interpretation when using biomarkers to diagnose infections in ED settings.
期刊介绍：
Clinical Biochemistry publishes articles relating to clinical chemistry, molecular biology and genetics, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory immunology and laboratory medicine in general, with the focus on analytical and clinical investigation of laboratory tests in humans used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapy, and monitoring of disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
