Simon Geck, Maximilian Roithmeier, Markus Bühner, Sophia Wehr, Lucia Weigel, Josef Priller, John M Davis, Stefan Leucht
{"title":"COSMIN对阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)测量特性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Simon Geck, Maximilian Roithmeier, Markus Bühner, Sophia Wehr, Lucia Weigel, Josef Priller, John M Davis, Stefan Leucht","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used tool for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia. Despite its widespread use, the psychometric properties of the PANSS have not been systematically reviewed. This study fills that gap in the scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS in its original three-subscale form as well as the quality level of the evidence available. On this basis we formulated recommendations for future research and use. A study protocol was registered under 10.17605/OSF.IO/5EGMD. The search period was until February 21, 2024.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 119 publications. According to COSMIN, the PANSS demonstrated sufficient reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness; but had significant shortcomings in content validity and structural validity. The original three-factor model showed poor structural validity, leading to its COSMIN classification as \"not recommendable\". The subscales showed overall acceptable measurement properties. However, the lack of structural validity of the three-subscale model renders its subscales less useful. Moreover, the PANSS negative subscale does not cover all domains of the National Institute of Mental Health consensus. Due to the length of the instrument (30-50 min), it is barely useable in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although the PANSS is the standard scale for schizophrenia symptom severity, its shortcomings regarding fundamental psychometric domains and practical applicability warrant the development of new scales for which appropriate methods should be applied from the start.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>There was no specific funding source for this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"103155"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).\",\"authors\":\"Simon Geck, Maximilian Roithmeier, Markus Bühner, Sophia Wehr, Lucia Weigel, Josef Priller, John M Davis, Stefan Leucht\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used tool for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia. Despite its widespread use, the psychometric properties of the PANSS have not been systematically reviewed. This study fills that gap in the scientific literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS in its original three-subscale form as well as the quality level of the evidence available. On this basis we formulated recommendations for future research and use. A study protocol was registered under 10.17605/OSF.IO/5EGMD. The search period was until February 21, 2024.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We included 119 publications. According to COSMIN, the PANSS demonstrated sufficient reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness; but had significant shortcomings in content validity and structural validity. The original three-factor model showed poor structural validity, leading to its COSMIN classification as \\\"not recommendable\\\". The subscales showed overall acceptable measurement properties. However, the lack of structural validity of the three-subscale model renders its subscales less useful. Moreover, the PANSS negative subscale does not cover all domains of the National Institute of Mental Health consensus. Due to the length of the instrument (30-50 min), it is barely useable in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Although the PANSS is the standard scale for schizophrenia symptom severity, its shortcomings regarding fundamental psychometric domains and practical applicability warrant the development of new scales for which appropriate methods should be applied from the start.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>There was no specific funding source for this research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"103155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12008685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103155\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103155","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)是目前应用最广泛的精神分裂症症状评估工具。尽管它被广泛使用,但PANSS的心理测量特性尚未被系统地审查。这项研究填补了科学文献中的空白。方法:采用基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,评估PANSS原始三分量表的心理测量特性以及现有证据的质量水平。在此基础上提出了今后研究和应用的建议。研究方案在10.17605/OSF.IO/5EGMD下注册。搜索期一直持续到2024年2月21日。结果:我们纳入了119篇出版物。经COSMIN测试,PANSS具有足够的信度、构念效度和反应性;但在内容效度和结构效度方面存在显著不足。原来的三因素模型结构效度较差,导致其在COSMIN分类为“不推荐”。量表显示出总体上可接受的测量特性。然而,由于三分量表模型的结构效度不足,使得它的分量表的作用不大。此外,PANSS负分量表并未涵盖国家心理健康研究所共识的所有领域。由于仪器的长度(30-50分钟),它几乎不能用于临床实践。解释:虽然PANSS是精神分裂症症状严重程度的标准量表,但它在基本心理测量领域和实际适用性方面的缺点保证了新量表的发展,从一开始就应该应用适当的方法。资金来源:本研究没有特定的资金来源。
COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis of the measurement properties of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).
Background: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is the most widely used tool for assessing the symptoms of schizophrenia. Despite its widespread use, the psychometric properties of the PANSS have not been systematically reviewed. This study fills that gap in the scientific literature.
Methods: We utilized the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analytical procedures to assess the psychometric properties of the PANSS in its original three-subscale form as well as the quality level of the evidence available. On this basis we formulated recommendations for future research and use. A study protocol was registered under 10.17605/OSF.IO/5EGMD. The search period was until February 21, 2024.
Findings: We included 119 publications. According to COSMIN, the PANSS demonstrated sufficient reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness; but had significant shortcomings in content validity and structural validity. The original three-factor model showed poor structural validity, leading to its COSMIN classification as "not recommendable". The subscales showed overall acceptable measurement properties. However, the lack of structural validity of the three-subscale model renders its subscales less useful. Moreover, the PANSS negative subscale does not cover all domains of the National Institute of Mental Health consensus. Due to the length of the instrument (30-50 min), it is barely useable in clinical practice.
Interpretation: Although the PANSS is the standard scale for schizophrenia symptom severity, its shortcomings regarding fundamental psychometric domains and practical applicability warrant the development of new scales for which appropriate methods should be applied from the start.
Funding: There was no specific funding source for this research.
期刊介绍:
eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.