Dronedarone提供有效的早期心律控制:使用EAST-AFNET 4标准对ATHENA试验进行事后分析。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf080
Paulus Kirchhof, A John Camm, Harry J G M Crijns, Jonathan P Piccini, Christian Torp-Pedersen, David S McKindley, Mattias Wieloch, Stefan H Hohnloser
{"title":"Dronedarone提供有效的早期心律控制:使用EAST-AFNET 4标准对ATHENA试验进行事后分析。","authors":"Paulus Kirchhof, A John Camm, Harry J G M Crijns, Jonathan P Piccini, Christian Torp-Pedersen, David S McKindley, Mattias Wieloch, Stefan H Hohnloser","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial assessed whether dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) improved cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo in patients with early atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) and cardiovascular comorbidities, based on EAST-AFNET 4 inclusion criteria and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The co-primary outcomes were (i) a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalisation due to worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and (ii) nights spent in hospital per year. Sinus rhythm (SR) at 12 months was a secondary outcome. The primary safety outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or pre-specified serious adverse events of special interest (AESIs) related to rhythm control therapy. 1810 patients with early AF were identified. Patients receiving dronedarone had fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes, strokes, or hospitalisations due to worsening of HF or ACS compared with patients receiving placebo [dronedarone (n = 924), 87 patients with ≥1 event; placebo (n = 886), 117 patients with ≥1 event; hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.94; P = 0.014]. Number of nights spent in hospital did not differ between treatment groups. More patients receiving dronedarone (69.2%) were in SR at 12 months compared with placebo (60.8%). Primary safety events comprising death, stroke, or pre-specified serious AESIs related to rhythm control therapy were not different (dronedarone vs. placebo: 60 vs. 71 patients with ≥1 event).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data support the use of dronedarone for early rhythm control therapy in selected patients with early AF.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ATHENA: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00174785. EAST-AFNET 4: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01288352.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dronedarone provides effective early rhythm control: post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial using EAST-AFNET 4 criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Paulus Kirchhof, A John Camm, Harry J G M Crijns, Jonathan P Piccini, Christian Torp-Pedersen, David S McKindley, Mattias Wieloch, Stefan H Hohnloser\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euaf080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial assessed whether dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) improved cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo in patients with early atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) and cardiovascular comorbidities, based on EAST-AFNET 4 inclusion criteria and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The co-primary outcomes were (i) a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalisation due to worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and (ii) nights spent in hospital per year. Sinus rhythm (SR) at 12 months was a secondary outcome. The primary safety outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or pre-specified serious adverse events of special interest (AESIs) related to rhythm control therapy. 1810 patients with early AF were identified. Patients receiving dronedarone had fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes, strokes, or hospitalisations due to worsening of HF or ACS compared with patients receiving placebo [dronedarone (n = 924), 87 patients with ≥1 event; placebo (n = 886), 117 patients with ≥1 event; hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.94; P = 0.014]. Number of nights spent in hospital did not differ between treatment groups. More patients receiving dronedarone (69.2%) were in SR at 12 months compared with placebo (60.8%). Primary safety events comprising death, stroke, or pre-specified serious AESIs related to rhythm control therapy were not different (dronedarone vs. placebo: 60 vs. 71 patients with ≥1 event).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data support the use of dronedarone for early rhythm control therapy in selected patients with early AF.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ATHENA: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00174785. EAST-AFNET 4: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01288352.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europace\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037275/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf080\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf080","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:基于EAST-AFNET 4的纳入标准和结果,对ATHENA试验进行事后分析,评估与安慰剂相比,dronedarone (400mg,每日两次)是否能改善早期心房颤动/心房扑动(AF)和心血管合并症患者的心血管结局。方法和结果:共同主要结局是(i)心血管死亡、中风或因心力衰竭(HF)或急性冠脉综合征(ACS)恶化而住院的复合结局,以及(ii)每年住院的天数。12个月时的窦性心律(SR)是次要结果。主要安全性终点是与节律控制治疗相关的死亡、中风或预先指定的严重特殊不良事件(AESIs)的综合结果。1810例早期房颤患者被确诊。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,接受dronedarone的患者因心血管原因、中风或HF或ACS恶化而住院的死亡人数更少[dronedarone (n = 924), 87例患者≥1个事件;安慰剂组(n = 886), 117例患者≥1次事件;风险比0.71;95%置信区间0.54-0.94;P = 0.014]。住院天数在治疗组之间没有差异。与安慰剂组(60.8%)相比,接受dronedarone治疗的患者(69.2%)在12个月时的SR发生率更高。与节律控制治疗相关的主要安全事件包括死亡、中风或预先指定的严重AESIs,这些事件没有差异(无人机达龙与安慰剂:60例与71例患者发生≥1个事件)。结论:这些数据支持在选定的早期房颤患者中使用dronedarone进行早期心律控制治疗。试验注册:ATHENA: ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00174785。EAST-AFNET 4: ClinicalTrials.gov识别码NCT01288352。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dronedarone provides effective early rhythm control: post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial using EAST-AFNET 4 criteria.

Aims: This post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial assessed whether dronedarone (400 mg twice daily) improved cardiovascular outcomes compared with placebo in patients with early atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF) and cardiovascular comorbidities, based on EAST-AFNET 4 inclusion criteria and outcomes.

Methods and results: The co-primary outcomes were (i) a composite of cardiovascular death, stroke, or hospitalisation due to worsening of heart failure (HF) or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and (ii) nights spent in hospital per year. Sinus rhythm (SR) at 12 months was a secondary outcome. The primary safety outcome was a composite of death, stroke, or pre-specified serious adverse events of special interest (AESIs) related to rhythm control therapy. 1810 patients with early AF were identified. Patients receiving dronedarone had fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes, strokes, or hospitalisations due to worsening of HF or ACS compared with patients receiving placebo [dronedarone (n = 924), 87 patients with ≥1 event; placebo (n = 886), 117 patients with ≥1 event; hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.94; P = 0.014]. Number of nights spent in hospital did not differ between treatment groups. More patients receiving dronedarone (69.2%) were in SR at 12 months compared with placebo (60.8%). Primary safety events comprising death, stroke, or pre-specified serious AESIs related to rhythm control therapy were not different (dronedarone vs. placebo: 60 vs. 71 patients with ≥1 event).

Conclusion: These data support the use of dronedarone for early rhythm control therapy in selected patients with early AF.

Trial registration: ATHENA: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00174785. EAST-AFNET 4: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01288352.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信