自主、能力和提供者沟通的先天心理需求是患者满意度和自评健康的决定因素。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Helen Omuya, Wan-Chin Kuo, Betty Chewning
{"title":"自主、能力和提供者沟通的先天心理需求是患者满意度和自评健康的决定因素。","authors":"Helen Omuya, Wan-Chin Kuo, Betty Chewning","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports from patient experience and satisfaction surveys are currently being used to target health quality improvement. The patient's healthcare experience is indicative of the interpersonal quality of care and significantly correlates with patient satisfaction as an evaluative measure. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to explore the association of predictor constructs in the theoretical model of STD-perceived provider communication (PPC) and other innate psychological constructs of competence and autonomy with self-rated health (SRH) and healthcare satisfaction (HS). Of particular interest is the SDT construct of relatedness. For this study, it was operationalized as the perceived health communication of a provider. Items relevant to SDT in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey were tested, first, for whether they fall into the predicted SDT constructs and, second, whether and how these constructs were associated with self-reported health and patient HS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-stage data were analyzed using subsamples from the 2018 and 2019 HRS. Independent variables included items measuring SDT constructs about PPC, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. Outcome variables included SRH and dimensions of HS, such as cost, quality, and providers. In the first stage, descriptive analyses and exploratory factor analysis were performed to identify the underlying factor structure. Principal axis factoring was used to extract factors. In the second stage, these factors were used in structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between SRH and HS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three factors with high internal consistencies (a > 0.8) and item-total correlations (r > 0.5) were identified. Data from the sample fit the structural model (χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047). The structural phase indicated that PPC and competence were positively associated with SRH and HS. However, autonomy was only significantly associated with SRH but not with HS.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Individuals who rated PPC behaviors and their sense of competence more highly also showed higher satisfaction with multiple healthcare domains and their SRH status. Patient-centered determinants of health outcomes are complex, and more studies are needed to understand their nuances.</p>","PeriodicalId":13800,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innate psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and provider communication as determinants of patients' satisfaction and self-rated health.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Omuya, Wan-Chin Kuo, Betty Chewning\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports from patient experience and satisfaction surveys are currently being used to target health quality improvement. The patient's healthcare experience is indicative of the interpersonal quality of care and significantly correlates with patient satisfaction as an evaluative measure. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to explore the association of predictor constructs in the theoretical model of STD-perceived provider communication (PPC) and other innate psychological constructs of competence and autonomy with self-rated health (SRH) and healthcare satisfaction (HS). Of particular interest is the SDT construct of relatedness. For this study, it was operationalized as the perceived health communication of a provider. Items relevant to SDT in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey were tested, first, for whether they fall into the predicted SDT constructs and, second, whether and how these constructs were associated with self-reported health and patient HS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-stage data were analyzed using subsamples from the 2018 and 2019 HRS. Independent variables included items measuring SDT constructs about PPC, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. Outcome variables included SRH and dimensions of HS, such as cost, quality, and providers. In the first stage, descriptive analyses and exploratory factor analysis were performed to identify the underlying factor structure. Principal axis factoring was used to extract factors. In the second stage, these factors were used in structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between SRH and HS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three factors with high internal consistencies (a > 0.8) and item-total correlations (r > 0.5) were identified. Data from the sample fit the structural model (χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047). The structural phase indicated that PPC and competence were positively associated with SRH and HS. However, autonomy was only significantly associated with SRH but not with HS.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Individuals who rated PPC behaviors and their sense of competence more highly also showed higher satisfaction with multiple healthcare domains and their SRH status. Patient-centered determinants of health outcomes are complex, and more studies are needed to understand their nuances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Quality in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Quality in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaf036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:来自患者体验和满意度调查的报告目前被用于目标卫生质量的改善。患者的医疗保健经验是指示的人际护理质量和显著相关的患者满意度作为一个评估措施。本研究以自我决定理论(SDT)为指导,探讨性传播疾病感知提供者沟通理论模型中的预测因子构念以及其他能力和自主性的先天心理构念与自我评价健康和医疗保健满意度的关系。特别有趣的是SDT的相关性构造。在本研究中,它被操作为提供者的感知健康沟通。健康与退休研究调查中与SDT相关的项目首先测试它们是否属于预测的SDT结构,其次测试这些结构是否以及如何与自我报告的健康和患者医疗保健满意度相关。方法:使用2018年和2019年健康与退休研究的子样本对两阶段数据进行分析。自变量包括测量SDT结构的项目,包括感知提供者沟通、心理健康和自我效能。结果变量包括自评健康(SRH)和医疗保健满意度(HS)维度,如成本、质量和提供者。在第一阶段,进行描述性分析和探索性因子分析(EFA)来确定潜在的因素结构。采用保理法提取因子。在第二阶段,利用结构方程模型(SEM)来研究这些因素与SRH和HS的关系。结果:确定了具有高内部一致性(a > 0.8)和项目-总相关性(r > 0.5)的三个因素。样本数据符合结构模型(χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047)。结构阶段表明,感知提供者沟通和能力与SRH和HS呈正相关。然而,自主性仅与SRH显著相关,而与HS无显著相关。讨论/结论:对感知提供者沟通行为和能力感评价较高的个体,对多个医疗保健领域和自身性健康健康状况的满意度也较高。以患者为中心的健康结果决定因素是复杂的,需要更多的研究来了解它们的细微差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innate psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and provider communication as determinants of patients' satisfaction and self-rated health.

Background: Reports from patient experience and satisfaction surveys are currently being used to target health quality improvement. The patient's healthcare experience is indicative of the interpersonal quality of care and significantly correlates with patient satisfaction as an evaluative measure. Guided by Self-Determination Theory (SDT), this study aims to explore the association of predictor constructs in the theoretical model of STD-perceived provider communication (PPC) and other innate psychological constructs of competence and autonomy with self-rated health (SRH) and healthcare satisfaction (HS). Of particular interest is the SDT construct of relatedness. For this study, it was operationalized as the perceived health communication of a provider. Items relevant to SDT in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) survey were tested, first, for whether they fall into the predicted SDT constructs and, second, whether and how these constructs were associated with self-reported health and patient HS.

Methods: Two-stage data were analyzed using subsamples from the 2018 and 2019 HRS. Independent variables included items measuring SDT constructs about PPC, psychological well-being, and self-efficacy. Outcome variables included SRH and dimensions of HS, such as cost, quality, and providers. In the first stage, descriptive analyses and exploratory factor analysis were performed to identify the underlying factor structure. Principal axis factoring was used to extract factors. In the second stage, these factors were used in structural equation modeling to examine the relationship between SRH and HS.

Results: Three factors with high internal consistencies (a > 0.8) and item-total correlations (r > 0.5) were identified. Data from the sample fit the structural model (χ2 = 0.00, CFI = 0.954, TLI = 0.946, RMSEA = 0.058, SRMR = 0.047). The structural phase indicated that PPC and competence were positively associated with SRH and HS. However, autonomy was only significantly associated with SRH but not with HS.

Discussion/conclusion: Individuals who rated PPC behaviors and their sense of competence more highly also showed higher satisfaction with multiple healthcare domains and their SRH status. Patient-centered determinants of health outcomes are complex, and more studies are needed to understand their nuances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Quality in Health Care makes activities and research related to quality and safety in health care available to a worldwide readership. The Journal publishes papers in all disciplines related to the quality and safety of health care, including health services research, health care evaluation, technology assessment, health economics, utilization review, cost containment, and nursing care research, as well as clinical research related to quality of care. This peer-reviewed journal is truly interdisciplinary and includes contributions from representatives of all health professions such as doctors, nurses, quality assurance professionals, managers, politicians, social workers, and therapists, as well as researchers from health-related backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信