Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher
{"title":"超越hydrasshift测定:等电聚焦用于治疗性抗体和副蛋白检测。","authors":"Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Hydrashift assay: the utility of isoelectric focusing for therapeutic antibody and paraprotein detection.\",\"authors\":\"Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond the Hydrashift assay: the utility of isoelectric focusing for therapeutic antibody and paraprotein detection.
Objectives: In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.
Methods: First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.
Results: The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.
Conclusions: Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!