超越hydrasshift测定:等电聚焦用于治疗性抗体和副蛋白检测。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher
{"title":"超越hydrasshift测定:等电聚焦用于治疗性抗体和副蛋白检测。","authors":"Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Hydrashift assay: the utility of isoelectric focusing for therapeutic antibody and paraprotein detection.\",\"authors\":\"Rieke Reiter, Christoph Mann, Wolfgang Andreas Nockher\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0352\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在血清免疫固定电泳中,治疗性单克隆抗体(tmab)可能被误读为副蛋白。规避这些干扰的策略包括使用抗tmab抗体,这导致了hydrasshift试验的发展。然而,该检测仅适用于Sebia平台,并且仅限于特定的tmab,如达拉单抗(DmAb)和isatuximab (ImAb)。此外,我们观察到一些病例中,通过hydrasshift法完全转移tmab是有问题的。本研究旨在探索等电聚焦(IEF)作为临床实验室广泛应用的替代方法。方法:首先,通过检测未稀释的tmAb样品来评估DmAb和ImAb hydrasshift法的中和能力。其次,将DmAb和ImAb加入到含有副蛋白的样品中,达到临床相关浓度,并通过hydrasshift实验和IEF进行分析。在这些样本和常规收集的患者样本中检测未移位tmAb的存在以及tmAb和副蛋白的鉴定。结果:hydrasshift检测可靠地转移到0.5 g/L DmAb和1.5 g/L ImAb。在鉴定抗体干扰和检测副蛋白方面,IEF被发现与hydrasshift试验同样有效。此外,IEF成功地鉴定出两种伪单克隆γ病为寡克隆,并检测到其他治疗性抗体。结论:在所研究的tmAb浓度的临床相关范围内,未观察到hydrasshift法的中和能力不足。IEF为区分tmab和副蛋白提供了一种简单而灵活的替代hydrasshift方法。它的优点包括更广泛地适用于各种tmab,并且独立于特定的商业平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the Hydrashift assay: the utility of isoelectric focusing for therapeutic antibody and paraprotein detection.

Objectives: In serum immunofixation electrophoresis, therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (tmAbs) can be misinterpreted as paraproteins. Strategies to circumvent these interferences include the use of anti-tmAb antibodies, which led to the development of the Hydrashift assay. However, this assay is exclusively available for the Sebia platform and limited to specific tmAbs, such as daratumumab (DmAb) and isatuximab (ImAb). Furthermore, we observed some cases in which complete shifting of tmAbs by the Hydrashift Assay was questionable. This study aimed to explore isoelectric focusing (IEF) as an alternative, widely applicable method for clinical laboratories.

Methods: First, the neutralization capacity of the DmAb and ImAb Hydrashift assay was assessed by testing undiluted tmAb samples. Second, DmAb and ImAb were spiked into paraprotein-containing samples in clinically relevant concentrations and analyzed by the Hydrashift assay and IEF. Presence of unshifted tmAb and identification of tmAb and paraproteins were examined in these samples and routinely collected patient samples.

Results: The Hydrashift assay reliably shifted up to 0.5 g/L DmAb and up to 1.5 g/L ImAb. IEF was found to be equally effective as the Hydrashift assay in identifying antibody interferences and detecting paraproteins. Additionally, IEF successfully identified two pseudo-monoclonal gammopathies as oligoclonal and detected other therapeutic antibodies.

Conclusions: Insufficient neutralization capacity of the Hydrashift Assay was not observed within the clinically relevant range of investigated tmAb concentrations. IEF offers a simple and flexible alternative to the Hydrashift assay for distinguishing tmAbs from paraproteins. Its advantages include broader applicability to various tmAbs and independency from specific commercial platforms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信