急诊科延迟订单到管理时间的相关因素:回顾性分析

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Yen-Wen Chen, Jian-Heng Lee, Cheng-Ying Chiang, Ya-Ni Yeh, Jih-Chun Lin, Ming-Jen Tsai
{"title":"急诊科延迟订单到管理时间的相关因素:回顾性分析","authors":"Yen-Wen Chen, Jian-Heng Lee, Cheng-Ying Chiang, Ya-Ni Yeh, Jih-Chun Lin, Ming-Jen Tsai","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01229-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely medication administration in the emergency department (ED) is critical for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of delayed order-to-administration (OTA) time, defined as exceeding 30 min for stat medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted in the ED of a 1,000-bed tertiary hospital. Patients aged 20 years or older who received stat medications between June 1 and August 31, 2020, were included. Only the first stat medication order per patient was analyzed. Data on patient demographics, triage characteristics, environmental factors, prescription details, and OTA times were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record and nursing information system. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was used to identify predictors of OTA delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 11,429 patient visits included, 9.9% experienced OTA delays exceeding 30 min. Predictors of higher odds of delay included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01), female sex (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.69), limited mobility (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.17-1.63 for ambulatory with assistance; aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48 for non-ambulatory patients), trauma (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI:1.09-1.66), hourly patient visits (aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10), concurrent intravenous fluid use (aOR:1.42, 95% CI:1.04-1.93), blood tests (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30), radiography (aOR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.87-2.64), and computed tomography (aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37-1.80). Reduced odds of delay were observed among patients with triage level 1 compared to level 3 (aOR 0.25, 95% CI:0.16-0.39), those arriving during night shifts compared to day shifts (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.63), and those receiving intramuscular medications compared to intravenous administration (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several patient, environmental, and diagnostic-related factors were associated with OTA delays in stat medication administration. Understanding these predictors may help inform strategies to optimize ED workflows. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in other ED settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with delayed order-to-administration time in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yen-Wen Chen, Jian-Heng Lee, Cheng-Ying Chiang, Ya-Ni Yeh, Jih-Chun Lin, Ming-Jen Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01229-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely medication administration in the emergency department (ED) is critical for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of delayed order-to-administration (OTA) time, defined as exceeding 30 min for stat medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted in the ED of a 1,000-bed tertiary hospital. Patients aged 20 years or older who received stat medications between June 1 and August 31, 2020, were included. Only the first stat medication order per patient was analyzed. Data on patient demographics, triage characteristics, environmental factors, prescription details, and OTA times were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record and nursing information system. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was used to identify predictors of OTA delays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 11,429 patient visits included, 9.9% experienced OTA delays exceeding 30 min. Predictors of higher odds of delay included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01), female sex (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.69), limited mobility (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.17-1.63 for ambulatory with assistance; aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48 for non-ambulatory patients), trauma (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI:1.09-1.66), hourly patient visits (aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10), concurrent intravenous fluid use (aOR:1.42, 95% CI:1.04-1.93), blood tests (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30), radiography (aOR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.87-2.64), and computed tomography (aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37-1.80). Reduced odds of delay were observed among patients with triage level 1 compared to level 3 (aOR 0.25, 95% CI:0.16-0.39), those arriving during night shifts compared to day shifts (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.63), and those receiving intramuscular medications compared to intravenous administration (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several patient, environmental, and diagnostic-related factors were associated with OTA delays in stat medication administration. Understanding these predictors may help inform strategies to optimize ED workflows. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in other ED settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039258/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01229-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01229-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在急诊科(ED)及时给药是改善患者预后的关键。本研究旨在确定延迟给药时间(OTA)的预测因素,定义为stat药物超过30分钟。方法:对某拥有1000张床位的三级医院急诊科进行回顾性分析。纳入了2020年6月1日至8月31日期间接受stat药物治疗的20岁或以上患者。仅分析了每位患者的第一次stat用药单。从医院的电子病历和护理信息系统中提取患者人口统计、分诊特征、环境因素、处方细节和OTA时间等数据。多变量逻辑回归与逆向消去被用来确定OTA延误的预测因素。结果:在纳入的11,429例患者就诊中,9.9%的患者经历了超过30分钟的OTA延迟。较高延迟几率的预测因素包括年龄较大(调整比值比[aOR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01)、女性(aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.69)、活动受限(aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.17-1.63);aOR: 1.24,非门诊患者的95% CI: 1.03-1.48)、创伤(aOR: 1.35, 95% CI:1.09-1.66)、每小时患者就诊(aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10)、同时静脉输液(aOR:1.42, 95% CI:1.04-1.93)、血液检查(aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30)、x线摄影(aOR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.87-2.64)和计算机断层扫描(aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37-1.80)。分诊等级为1级的患者与分级等级为3级的患者相比(aOR为0.25,95% CI为0.16-0.39),夜班就诊的患者与白班就诊的患者相比(aOR为0.33,95% CI为0.18-0.63),接受肌肉注射药物的患者与静脉给药的患者相比(aOR为0.71;95% ci, 0.55-0.93)。结论:一些患者、环境和诊断相关因素与stat药物给药的OTA延迟有关。了解这些预测因素可能有助于制定优化ED工作流程的策略。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现在其他急诊科的设置。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with delayed order-to-administration time in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Timely medication administration in the emergency department (ED) is critical for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of delayed order-to-administration (OTA) time, defined as exceeding 30 min for stat medications.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted in the ED of a 1,000-bed tertiary hospital. Patients aged 20 years or older who received stat medications between June 1 and August 31, 2020, were included. Only the first stat medication order per patient was analyzed. Data on patient demographics, triage characteristics, environmental factors, prescription details, and OTA times were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record and nursing information system. Multivariable logistic regression with backward elimination was used to identify predictors of OTA delays.

Results: Among the 11,429 patient visits included, 9.9% experienced OTA delays exceeding 30 min. Predictors of higher odds of delay included older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01), female sex (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.31-1.69), limited mobility (aOR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.17-1.63 for ambulatory with assistance; aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.48 for non-ambulatory patients), trauma (aOR: 1.35, 95% CI:1.09-1.66), hourly patient visits (aOR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.05-1.10), concurrent intravenous fluid use (aOR:1.42, 95% CI:1.04-1.93), blood tests (aOR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.30-2.30), radiography (aOR: 2.22, 95% CI: 1.87-2.64), and computed tomography (aOR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37-1.80). Reduced odds of delay were observed among patients with triage level 1 compared to level 3 (aOR 0.25, 95% CI:0.16-0.39), those arriving during night shifts compared to day shifts (aOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.63), and those receiving intramuscular medications compared to intravenous administration (aOR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93).

Conclusions: Several patient, environmental, and diagnostic-related factors were associated with OTA delays in stat medication administration. Understanding these predictors may help inform strategies to optimize ED workflows. Further research is warranted to validate these findings in other ED settings.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信