Kari A O Tikkinen, Deborah M Siegal, P J Devereaux, Sara V Tornberg, Flavia K Borges, Sandra Ofori, Jehonathan Pinthus, Bobby Shayegan, Lauri I Lavikainen, Gordon H Guyatt, Pavel S Roshanov
{"title":"CLUE腹腔和盆腔手术后静脉血栓栓塞风险仪:患者风险因素成分的验证。","authors":"Kari A O Tikkinen, Deborah M Siegal, P J Devereaux, Sara V Tornberg, Flavia K Borges, Sandra Ofori, Jehonathan Pinthus, Bobby Shayegan, Lauri I Lavikainen, Gordon H Guyatt, Pavel S Roshanov","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major postoperative risk. Systematic reviews have established procedure-specific VTE risk estimates, which form one component of the CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument. The instrument also incorporates patient-level factors-age (≥75 years), BMI (≥35 kg/m²), and prior VTE-to stratify overall risk. However, the patient risk factor component has not been formally validated. We therefore conducted the validation using data from the VISION study, a prospective, international cohort of 11,636 patients undergoing major general abdominal, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. Thirty-day postoperative VTE incidence was analyzed using modified Poisson regression. The instrument classified patients as low (72%), medium (25%), and high (4%) risk factor categories. VTE occurred in 97 patients (0.8%). Compared to the low-risk group, the relative risks of VTE was 1.56 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.43) for medium-risk and 3.60 (1.90-6.83) for high-risk patients. Among patients who did not receive antithrombotic medication, relative risks increased to 1.91 for medium-risk and 5.41 for high-risk patients. The CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument, using three widely available patient-level factors, accurately classifies patients into substantially different categories of relative VTE risk. This validated patient component complements procedure-specific absolute risk estimates derived from prior systematic reviews. To support evidence-based thromboprophylaxis decisions the instrument is now available through an interactive online platform.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument for Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery: Validation of Patient Risk Factor Component.\",\"authors\":\"Kari A O Tikkinen, Deborah M Siegal, P J Devereaux, Sara V Tornberg, Flavia K Borges, Sandra Ofori, Jehonathan Pinthus, Bobby Shayegan, Lauri I Lavikainen, Gordon H Guyatt, Pavel S Roshanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major postoperative risk. Systematic reviews have established procedure-specific VTE risk estimates, which form one component of the CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument. The instrument also incorporates patient-level factors-age (≥75 years), BMI (≥35 kg/m²), and prior VTE-to stratify overall risk. However, the patient risk factor component has not been formally validated. We therefore conducted the validation using data from the VISION study, a prospective, international cohort of 11,636 patients undergoing major general abdominal, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. Thirty-day postoperative VTE incidence was analyzed using modified Poisson regression. The instrument classified patients as low (72%), medium (25%), and high (4%) risk factor categories. VTE occurred in 97 patients (0.8%). Compared to the low-risk group, the relative risks of VTE was 1.56 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.43) for medium-risk and 3.60 (1.90-6.83) for high-risk patients. Among patients who did not receive antithrombotic medication, relative risks increased to 1.91 for medium-risk and 5.41 for high-risk patients. The CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument, using three widely available patient-level factors, accurately classifies patients into substantially different categories of relative VTE risk. This validated patient component complements procedure-specific absolute risk estimates derived from prior systematic reviews. To support evidence-based thromboprophylaxis decisions the instrument is now available through an interactive online platform.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015515\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015515","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument for Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery: Validation of Patient Risk Factor Component.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major postoperative risk. Systematic reviews have established procedure-specific VTE risk estimates, which form one component of the CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument. The instrument also incorporates patient-level factors-age (≥75 years), BMI (≥35 kg/m²), and prior VTE-to stratify overall risk. However, the patient risk factor component has not been formally validated. We therefore conducted the validation using data from the VISION study, a prospective, international cohort of 11,636 patients undergoing major general abdominal, urologic, or gynecologic surgery. Thirty-day postoperative VTE incidence was analyzed using modified Poisson regression. The instrument classified patients as low (72%), medium (25%), and high (4%) risk factor categories. VTE occurred in 97 patients (0.8%). Compared to the low-risk group, the relative risks of VTE was 1.56 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.43) for medium-risk and 3.60 (1.90-6.83) for high-risk patients. Among patients who did not receive antithrombotic medication, relative risks increased to 1.91 for medium-risk and 5.41 for high-risk patients. The CLUE Post-Surgery VTE Risk Instrument, using three widely available patient-level factors, accurately classifies patients into substantially different categories of relative VTE risk. This validated patient component complements procedure-specific absolute risk estimates derived from prior systematic reviews. To support evidence-based thromboprophylaxis decisions the instrument is now available through an interactive online platform.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.