Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Pietro Scilipoti, Francesco Pellegrino, Jozefina Casuscelli, Lazaros Tzelves, Stamatios Katsimperis, Davide Ciavarella, Maria Carmen Mir, Ioannis Sokolakis, Tobias Klatte, Alberto Ramos Belinchon, Jorge Caño Velasco, Yasuhisa Fujii, Hajime Tanaka, Soichiro Yoshida, Shunya Matsumoto, Paolo Umari, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chris Wong Ho Ming, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Mastroianni, Roman Mayr, Francesco Del Giudice, Marco Moschini
{"title":"在先前的三位一体治疗后保留膀胱切除术的作用:一项多国配对分析。","authors":"Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Pietro Scilipoti, Francesco Pellegrino, Jozefina Casuscelli, Lazaros Tzelves, Stamatios Katsimperis, Davide Ciavarella, Maria Carmen Mir, Ioannis Sokolakis, Tobias Klatte, Alberto Ramos Belinchon, Jorge Caño Velasco, Yasuhisa Fujii, Hajime Tanaka, Soichiro Yoshida, Shunya Matsumoto, Paolo Umari, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chris Wong Ho Ming, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Mastroianni, Roman Mayr, Francesco Del Giudice, Marco Moschini","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Trimodality therapy (TMT) with transurethral resection followed by radiation of the urinary bladder and chemotherapy is associated with similar long-term survival rates to radical cystectomy (RC) for well-selected patients. Nevertheless, salvage RC may become necessary in 10% of patients receiving TMT. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of salvage RC after prior TMT through a large multinational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with pure urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder. Patients undergoing salvage RC after prior TMT due to recurrence in the urinary bladder from 13 high-volume centers were matched with a propensity score analysis in a 1:1 ratio with patients without prior TMT undergoing primary RC. The two groups were adjusted for institution, age, histological status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and surgical technique (open or minimally invasive RC).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 118 patients (59 per group) with a median age of 73 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-79). Seven patients (11%) developed severe, grade 4 or 5 perioperative complications during RC after prior TMT. The 30- and 90-d survival rates of salvage RC after prior TMT were 93% and 91%, respectively. RC in patients with prior TMT was associated with higher blood loss by 297 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-520, p = 0.010) and higher odds of admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.7, p = 0.017) than primary RC in matched patients. At a median follow-up of 10 mo (IQR: 5-34), 29 deaths occurred in patients requiring RC after prior TMT. Prior TMT was associated with worse overall survival than primary RC (hazard ratio: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Salvage RC after TMT and primary RC have comparable perioperative outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RC after TMT may have worse overall survival in the long term, likely reflecting tumor biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Salvage Cystectomy After Prior Trimodality Therapy: A Multinational Match-paired Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Pyrgidis, Gerald Bastian Schulz, Pietro Scilipoti, Francesco Pellegrino, Jozefina Casuscelli, Lazaros Tzelves, Stamatios Katsimperis, Davide Ciavarella, Maria Carmen Mir, Ioannis Sokolakis, Tobias Klatte, Alberto Ramos Belinchon, Jorge Caño Velasco, Yasuhisa Fujii, Hajime Tanaka, Soichiro Yoshida, Shunya Matsumoto, Paolo Umari, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Chris Wong Ho Ming, Giuseppe Simone, Riccardo Mastroianni, Roman Mayr, Francesco Del Giudice, Marco Moschini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Trimodality therapy (TMT) with transurethral resection followed by radiation of the urinary bladder and chemotherapy is associated with similar long-term survival rates to radical cystectomy (RC) for well-selected patients. Nevertheless, salvage RC may become necessary in 10% of patients receiving TMT. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of salvage RC after prior TMT through a large multinational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients with pure urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder. Patients undergoing salvage RC after prior TMT due to recurrence in the urinary bladder from 13 high-volume centers were matched with a propensity score analysis in a 1:1 ratio with patients without prior TMT undergoing primary RC. The two groups were adjusted for institution, age, histological status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and surgical technique (open or minimally invasive RC).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We included 118 patients (59 per group) with a median age of 73 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-79). Seven patients (11%) developed severe, grade 4 or 5 perioperative complications during RC after prior TMT. The 30- and 90-d survival rates of salvage RC after prior TMT were 93% and 91%, respectively. RC in patients with prior TMT was associated with higher blood loss by 297 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-520, p = 0.010) and higher odds of admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.7, p = 0.017) than primary RC in matched patients. At a median follow-up of 10 mo (IQR: 5-34), 29 deaths occurred in patients requiring RC after prior TMT. Prior TMT was associated with worse overall survival than primary RC (hazard ratio: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Salvage RC after TMT and primary RC have comparable perioperative outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RC after TMT may have worse overall survival in the long term, likely reflecting tumor biology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:三联疗法(TMT)经尿道切除术后膀胱放疗和化疗与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)的长期生存率相似。然而,10%接受TMT的患者可能需要补救性RC。我们旨在通过一项大型跨国队列研究来评估先前TMT后抢救性RC的围手术期和长期结果。方法:我们纳入单纯的膀胱尿路上皮癌患者。在13个大容量中心,由于膀胱复发而进行TMT后补救性RC的患者与没有TMT的患者进行原发性RC的倾向评分分析,比例为1:1。根据机构、年龄、组织学状况、美国麻醉医师学会评分和手术技术(开放或微创RC)对两组进行调整。主要发现和局限性:我们纳入了118例患者(每组59例),中位年龄为73岁(四分位数间距[IQR]: 66-79)。7名患者(11%)在术前TMT后的RC期间出现严重的4级或5级围手术期并发症。术后30天和90天的存活率分别为93%和91%。既往TMT患者的RC与297 ml出血量增加相关(95%可信区间[CI]: 73-520, p = 0.010),并且与匹配患者的原发性RC相比,其进入重症监护病房的几率更高(优势比:2.8,95% CI: 1.2-6.7, p = 0.017)。在中位随访10个月(IQR: 5-34), 29例患者在既往TMT后需要RC。既往TMT患者的总生存期较原发性RC患者差(风险比:1.9,95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.032)。结论和临床意义:TMT后补救性RC和原发性RC的围手术期预后相当。TMT后接受补救性RC的患者可能有较差的长期总生存率,可能反映了肿瘤生物学。
The Role of Salvage Cystectomy After Prior Trimodality Therapy: A Multinational Match-paired Analysis.
Background and objective: Trimodality therapy (TMT) with transurethral resection followed by radiation of the urinary bladder and chemotherapy is associated with similar long-term survival rates to radical cystectomy (RC) for well-selected patients. Nevertheless, salvage RC may become necessary in 10% of patients receiving TMT. We aimed to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes of salvage RC after prior TMT through a large multinational cohort study.
Methods: We included patients with pure urothelial cancer of the urinary bladder. Patients undergoing salvage RC after prior TMT due to recurrence in the urinary bladder from 13 high-volume centers were matched with a propensity score analysis in a 1:1 ratio with patients without prior TMT undergoing primary RC. The two groups were adjusted for institution, age, histological status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and surgical technique (open or minimally invasive RC).
Key findings and limitations: We included 118 patients (59 per group) with a median age of 73 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 66-79). Seven patients (11%) developed severe, grade 4 or 5 perioperative complications during RC after prior TMT. The 30- and 90-d survival rates of salvage RC after prior TMT were 93% and 91%, respectively. RC in patients with prior TMT was associated with higher blood loss by 297 ml (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-520, p = 0.010) and higher odds of admission to the intensive care unit (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2-6.7, p = 0.017) than primary RC in matched patients. At a median follow-up of 10 mo (IQR: 5-34), 29 deaths occurred in patients requiring RC after prior TMT. Prior TMT was associated with worse overall survival than primary RC (hazard ratio: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.2-4.1, p = 0.032).
Conclusions and clinical implications: Salvage RC after TMT and primary RC have comparable perioperative outcomes. Patients undergoing salvage RC after TMT may have worse overall survival in the long term, likely reflecting tumor biology.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.