Josef Pickl, Andreas Heinzel, Stephen Shoebridge, Alexander Kainz, Rainer Oberbauer
{"title":"全基因组供体受体非hla不匹配和移植物损失。","authors":"Josef Pickl, Andreas Heinzel, Stephen Shoebridge, Alexander Kainz, Rainer Oberbauer","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>HLA-matching between donor (D) and recipient (R) is routinely performed in kidney allocation to optimize allograft survival but explains only a moderate variability of these outcomes. Recent findings suggest that donor to recipient mismatches outside the HLA region contributes to alloimmunity and graft loss but the extent varies in different publications. We therefore conducted a systematic review of publications on this subject using a broad search string in our literature review in accordance with current guidelines for systematic reviews. The effect sizes were analyzed by a meta-analysis. 1890 Publications from 2019-2025 within three different repositories (465 Medline; 1408 Embase; 17 Central) were systematically screened using the PICOTS system, which resulted in 12 eligible papers that met the inclusion criteria. Cohort studies that investigated the association of D-R non-HLA SNP-mismatch and graft rejection/loss in renal transplant patients were included. We found that overall SNP mismatch between D-R pairs outside the HLA region was independently numerically associated with rejection HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.97-1.65) and graft loss HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12). Furthermore, loss of function mutation of the gene LIMS1 in the recipient who received a transplant organ with at least one functioning copy (collision genotype) was numerically associated with rejection HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23) and graft loss HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36). The exact quantification of the effect size of these mismatches varied by publication and needs further investigation. Based on these data, the strength of immunosuppression may be guided by the load of D-R mismatches in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genome-wide donor recipient non-HLA mismatch and graft loss.\",\"authors\":\"Josef Pickl, Andreas Heinzel, Stephen Shoebridge, Alexander Kainz, Rainer Oberbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfaf073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>HLA-matching between donor (D) and recipient (R) is routinely performed in kidney allocation to optimize allograft survival but explains only a moderate variability of these outcomes. Recent findings suggest that donor to recipient mismatches outside the HLA region contributes to alloimmunity and graft loss but the extent varies in different publications. We therefore conducted a systematic review of publications on this subject using a broad search string in our literature review in accordance with current guidelines for systematic reviews. The effect sizes were analyzed by a meta-analysis. 1890 Publications from 2019-2025 within three different repositories (465 Medline; 1408 Embase; 17 Central) were systematically screened using the PICOTS system, which resulted in 12 eligible papers that met the inclusion criteria. Cohort studies that investigated the association of D-R non-HLA SNP-mismatch and graft rejection/loss in renal transplant patients were included. We found that overall SNP mismatch between D-R pairs outside the HLA region was independently numerically associated with rejection HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.97-1.65) and graft loss HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12). Furthermore, loss of function mutation of the gene LIMS1 in the recipient who received a transplant organ with at least one functioning copy (collision genotype) was numerically associated with rejection HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23) and graft loss HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36). The exact quantification of the effect size of these mismatches varied by publication and needs further investigation. Based on these data, the strength of immunosuppression may be guided by the load of D-R mismatches in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
供体(D)和受体(R)之间的hla匹配通常在肾脏分配中进行,以优化同种异体移植物的生存,但只能解释这些结果的适度变化。最近的研究结果表明,供体与受体在HLA区域外的不匹配导致同种免疫和移植物损失,但在不同的出版物中程度不同。因此,我们按照现行的系统综述指南,在文献综述中使用广泛的搜索字符串,对这一主题的出版物进行了系统综述。效应量通过荟萃分析进行分析。1890出版物从2019-2025年在三个不同的存储库(465 Medline;1408 Embase;使用PICOTS系统对17篇中央文献进行了系统筛选,最终得到12篇符合纳入标准的合格论文。纳入了研究肾移植患者D-R非hla snp不匹配与移植排斥/损失之间关系的队列研究。我们发现,HLA区域外的D-R对之间的总体SNP不匹配与排斥HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.97-1.65)和移植物损失HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12)独立相关。此外,在接受至少有一个功能拷贝的移植器官(碰撞基因型)的受体中,LIMS1基因的功能突变丧失与排斥HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23)和移植物损失HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36)相关。这些不匹配效应大小的确切量化因出版物而异,需要进一步研究。基于这些数据,未来免疫抑制的强度可能以D-R错配的负荷为指导。
Genome-wide donor recipient non-HLA mismatch and graft loss.
HLA-matching between donor (D) and recipient (R) is routinely performed in kidney allocation to optimize allograft survival but explains only a moderate variability of these outcomes. Recent findings suggest that donor to recipient mismatches outside the HLA region contributes to alloimmunity and graft loss but the extent varies in different publications. We therefore conducted a systematic review of publications on this subject using a broad search string in our literature review in accordance with current guidelines for systematic reviews. The effect sizes were analyzed by a meta-analysis. 1890 Publications from 2019-2025 within three different repositories (465 Medline; 1408 Embase; 17 Central) were systematically screened using the PICOTS system, which resulted in 12 eligible papers that met the inclusion criteria. Cohort studies that investigated the association of D-R non-HLA SNP-mismatch and graft rejection/loss in renal transplant patients were included. We found that overall SNP mismatch between D-R pairs outside the HLA region was independently numerically associated with rejection HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.97-1.65) and graft loss HR 1.35 (95% CI 0.86-2.12). Furthermore, loss of function mutation of the gene LIMS1 in the recipient who received a transplant organ with at least one functioning copy (collision genotype) was numerically associated with rejection HR 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.23) and graft loss HR 1.43 (95% CI 0.61-3.36). The exact quantification of the effect size of these mismatches varied by publication and needs further investigation. Based on these data, the strength of immunosuppression may be guided by the load of D-R mismatches in the future.
期刊介绍:
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
Print ISSN: 0931-0509.