Mario Gaudino, Matthias Siepe, Gavin J Murphy, Bryan Williams, Sigrid Sandner, Alexander C Gregg, Alan J Moskowitz, Volkmar Falk, Annetine C Gelijns
{"title":"心脏手术的随机试验:原因和方式。","authors":"Mario Gaudino, Matthias Siepe, Gavin J Murphy, Bryan Williams, Sigrid Sandner, Alexander C Gregg, Alan J Moskowitz, Volkmar Falk, Annetine C Gelijns","doi":"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparative effectiveness. However, they face unique challenges in cardiac surgery. The objective of this work is to summarize the challenges of RCTs in cardiac surgery, describe efforts employed in recent years to mitigate these impediments and outline the future opportunities for increased RCT adoption in the specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted as an expert analysis on the existing state of RCTs in cardiac surgery based on expert discussion at a dedicated session during the 2024 Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Different trial-support infrastructures, such as the Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial Grafts (ROMA) Network, the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN), the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF) and the UK Model, and their respective mechanisms for overcoming RCT barriers were described in detailed. Models were selected due to specific author involvement and knowledge. Future directions were postulated based on current trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite heterogeneous structures, the described models largely aimed to increased cardiac RCTs through improved trial participation, either via increased trainees, expanded stakeholders or focused patient recruitment, facilitating funding and fostering wider collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCTs are a key component for clinical advancement yet have been underutilized in cardiac surgery. Recent endeavours have reduced the multifactorial barriers associated with cardiac surgery RCTs and intentional future efforts are necessary for continued cardiac advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11938,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How.\",\"authors\":\"Mario Gaudino, Matthias Siepe, Gavin J Murphy, Bryan Williams, Sigrid Sandner, Alexander C Gregg, Alan J Moskowitz, Volkmar Falk, Annetine C Gelijns\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejcts/ezaf164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparative effectiveness. However, they face unique challenges in cardiac surgery. The objective of this work is to summarize the challenges of RCTs in cardiac surgery, describe efforts employed in recent years to mitigate these impediments and outline the future opportunities for increased RCT adoption in the specialty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was conducted as an expert analysis on the existing state of RCTs in cardiac surgery based on expert discussion at a dedicated session during the 2024 Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Different trial-support infrastructures, such as the Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial Grafts (ROMA) Network, the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN), the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF) and the UK Model, and their respective mechanisms for overcoming RCT barriers were described in detailed. Models were selected due to specific author involvement and knowledge. Future directions were postulated based on current trends.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite heterogeneous structures, the described models largely aimed to increased cardiac RCTs through improved trial participation, either via increased trainees, expanded stakeholders or focused patient recruitment, facilitating funding and fostering wider collaboration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCTs are a key component for clinical advancement yet have been underutilized in cardiac surgery. Recent endeavours have reduced the multifactorial barriers associated with cardiac surgery RCTs and intentional future efforts are necessary for continued cardiac advancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaf164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: Why and How.
Objectives: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for comparative effectiveness. However, they face unique challenges in cardiac surgery. The objective of this work is to summarize the challenges of RCTs in cardiac surgery, describe efforts employed in recent years to mitigate these impediments and outline the future opportunities for increased RCT adoption in the specialty.
Methods: This review was conducted as an expert analysis on the existing state of RCTs in cardiac surgery based on expert discussion at a dedicated session during the 2024 Annual Meeting of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Different trial-support infrastructures, such as the Randomized Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial Grafts (ROMA) Network, the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN), the Global Cardiovascular Research Funders Forum (GCRFF) and the UK Model, and their respective mechanisms for overcoming RCT barriers were described in detailed. Models were selected due to specific author involvement and knowledge. Future directions were postulated based on current trends.
Results: Despite heterogeneous structures, the described models largely aimed to increased cardiac RCTs through improved trial participation, either via increased trainees, expanded stakeholders or focused patient recruitment, facilitating funding and fostering wider collaboration.
Conclusions: RCTs are a key component for clinical advancement yet have been underutilized in cardiac surgery. Recent endeavours have reduced the multifactorial barriers associated with cardiac surgery RCTs and intentional future efforts are necessary for continued cardiac advancement.
期刊介绍:
The primary aim of the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is to provide a medium for the publication of high-quality original scientific reports documenting progress in cardiac and thoracic surgery. The journal publishes reports of significant clinical and experimental advances related to surgery of the heart, the great vessels and the chest. The European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery is an international journal and accepts submissions from all regions. The journal is supported by a number of leading European societies.