你是否患有癫痫,癫痫性疾病,或者两者都没有?癫痫门诊患者对诊断的认知。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-05-05 DOI:10.1111/epi.18441
Farnaz Sinaei, Colin B Josephson, Samuel Wiebe
{"title":"你是否患有癫痫,癫痫性疾病,或者两者都没有?癫痫门诊患者对诊断的认知。","authors":"Farnaz Sinaei, Colin B Josephson, Samuel Wiebe","doi":"10.1111/epi.18441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis as being epilepsy, a seizure disorder, or neither.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People diagnosed with epilepsy by epileptologists, responded to two questions: \"do you have epilepsy?\" and \"do you have a seizure disorder?\". Demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were extracted from Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program registry. Multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with self-perception of the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1684 epilepsy patients who answered both questions, 1231 (73.1%) perceived themselves as having epilepsy, 137 (8.1%) a seizure disorder but not epilepsy, 145 (8.6%) neither of the diagnoses, and 171 (10.2%) as not knowing their diagnosis. On multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of self-perception as having a seizure disorder versus epilepsy included having focal epilepsy (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-102.1), and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), whereas self-perception of having a seizure disorder vs epilepsy was lower in females (RRR = .36, 95% CI: .14-.94) and those taking more antiseizure medications (ASMs) (RRR = .19, 95% CI: .06-.58). Self-perception of having neither diagnosis was significantly more likely in people with focal epilepsy (RRR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3) and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), whereas the likelihood was lower with a longer duration of epilepsy (RRR = .96, 95% CI: .93-.99), taking a higher number of ASMs, (RRR = .14, 95% CI: .04-.51), having more side effects (RRR = .89, 95% CI: .83-.96), a higher self-rated severity of epilepsy (RRR = .26, 95% CI: .14-.49), and if the respondent was the patient as opposed to a proxy (RRR = .24, 95% CI: .07-.85).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In a clinical setting, clinical characteristics, rather than sociodemographic factors, largely explain how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis. Markers of higher seizure severity and longer illness duration increase the likelihood of self-perception as having epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do you have epilepsy, a seizure disorder, or neither? Patients' perception of their diagnosis in an epilepsy clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Farnaz Sinaei, Colin B Josephson, Samuel Wiebe\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis as being epilepsy, a seizure disorder, or neither.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People diagnosed with epilepsy by epileptologists, responded to two questions: \\\"do you have epilepsy?\\\" and \\\"do you have a seizure disorder?\\\". Demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were extracted from Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program registry. Multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with self-perception of the diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1684 epilepsy patients who answered both questions, 1231 (73.1%) perceived themselves as having epilepsy, 137 (8.1%) a seizure disorder but not epilepsy, 145 (8.6%) neither of the diagnoses, and 171 (10.2%) as not knowing their diagnosis. On multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of self-perception as having a seizure disorder versus epilepsy included having focal epilepsy (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-102.1), and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), whereas self-perception of having a seizure disorder vs epilepsy was lower in females (RRR = .36, 95% CI: .14-.94) and those taking more antiseizure medications (ASMs) (RRR = .19, 95% CI: .06-.58). Self-perception of having neither diagnosis was significantly more likely in people with focal epilepsy (RRR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3) and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), whereas the likelihood was lower with a longer duration of epilepsy (RRR = .96, 95% CI: .93-.99), taking a higher number of ASMs, (RRR = .14, 95% CI: .04-.51), having more side effects (RRR = .89, 95% CI: .83-.96), a higher self-rated severity of epilepsy (RRR = .26, 95% CI: .14-.49), and if the respondent was the patient as opposed to a proxy (RRR = .24, 95% CI: .07-.85).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>In a clinical setting, clinical characteristics, rather than sociodemographic factors, largely explain how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis. Markers of higher seizure severity and longer illness duration increase the likelihood of self-perception as having epilepsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18441\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18441","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨癫痫患者如何将自己的诊断定性为癫痫、癫痫发作障碍或两者都不是。方法:被癫痫学家诊断为癫痫的人回答两个问题:“你有癫痫吗?”和“你有癫痫发作障碍吗?”人口统计学、临床和患者报告的结果测量从卡尔加里综合癫痫项目登记处提取。使用多变量多项和逻辑回归模型来确定与诊断自我感知相关的因素。结果:在1684例癫痫患者中,1231例(73.1%)认为自己患有癫痫,137例(8.1%)有癫痫发作障碍但没有癫痫,145例(8.6%)两种诊断都没有,171例(10.2%)不知道自己的诊断。在多变量分析中,与自我认知为癫痫发作障碍的可能性较高相关的因素包括局灶性癫痫(相对风险比[RRR] = 13.1, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.7-102.1)和较高的共病负担(RRR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7),而女性自我认知为癫痫发作障碍的可能性较低(RRR =。36, 95% CI: 0.14 - 0.94)和服用较多抗癫痫药物(asm)的患者(RRR =。19, 95% ci: .06-.58)。局灶性癫痫患者(RRR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3)和较高的共病负担(RRR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4)的自我感觉没有任何诊断的可能性更大,而癫痫持续时间越长,这种可能性越低(RRR = 2.4)。96, 95% CI: 0.93 - 0.99),服用较多asm, (RRR =。14, 95% CI: .04-.51),有更多的副作用(RRR =。89, 95% CI: 0.83 - 0.96),自评癫痫严重程度较高(RRR =。26, 95% CI: 0.14 - 0.49),如果被调查者是患者而不是代理人(RRR =。24, 95% ci: .07-.85)。意义:在临床环境中,临床特征,而不是社会人口因素,在很大程度上解释了癫痫患者如何自我描述其诊断。较高的癫痫发作严重程度和较长的疾病持续时间的标志增加了自我认知为患有癫痫的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do you have epilepsy, a seizure disorder, or neither? Patients' perception of their diagnosis in an epilepsy clinic.

Objective: To explore how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis as being epilepsy, a seizure disorder, or neither.

Methods: People diagnosed with epilepsy by epileptologists, responded to two questions: "do you have epilepsy?" and "do you have a seizure disorder?". Demographic, clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were extracted from Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program registry. Multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with self-perception of the diagnosis.

Results: Of 1684 epilepsy patients who answered both questions, 1231 (73.1%) perceived themselves as having epilepsy, 137 (8.1%) a seizure disorder but not epilepsy, 145 (8.6%) neither of the diagnoses, and 171 (10.2%) as not knowing their diagnosis. On multivariate analyses, factors significantly associated with a higher likelihood of self-perception as having a seizure disorder versus epilepsy included having focal epilepsy (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 13.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-102.1), and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3-2.7), whereas self-perception of having a seizure disorder vs epilepsy was lower in females (RRR = .36, 95% CI: .14-.94) and those taking more antiseizure medications (ASMs) (RRR = .19, 95% CI: .06-.58). Self-perception of having neither diagnosis was significantly more likely in people with focal epilepsy (RRR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.2-8.3) and a higher comorbidity burden (RRR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.4), whereas the likelihood was lower with a longer duration of epilepsy (RRR = .96, 95% CI: .93-.99), taking a higher number of ASMs, (RRR = .14, 95% CI: .04-.51), having more side effects (RRR = .89, 95% CI: .83-.96), a higher self-rated severity of epilepsy (RRR = .26, 95% CI: .14-.49), and if the respondent was the patient as opposed to a proxy (RRR = .24, 95% CI: .07-.85).

Significance: In a clinical setting, clinical characteristics, rather than sociodemographic factors, largely explain how people with epilepsy self-characterize their diagnosis. Markers of higher seizure severity and longer illness duration increase the likelihood of self-perception as having epilepsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信