DENO研究组在骨巨细胞肿瘤中使用Denosumab的多中心研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Deno Research Group, Carolina de la Calva, Manuel Angulo, Paula González-Rojo, Ana Peiró, Pau Machado, Juan Luis Cebrián, Roberto García-Maroto, Antonio Valcárcel, Pablo Puertas, Gregorio Valero-Cifuentes, Óscar Pablos, Miriam Maireles, María Luisa Fontalva, Iván Chaves, Aida Orce, Luis Coll-Mesa, Israel Pérez, Fausto González, María Del Carmen Sanz, Isidro Gracia
{"title":"DENO研究组在骨巨细胞肿瘤中使用Denosumab的多中心研究。","authors":"Deno Research Group, Carolina de la Calva, Manuel Angulo, Paula González-Rojo, Ana Peiró, Pau Machado, Juan Luis Cebrián, Roberto García-Maroto, Antonio Valcárcel, Pablo Puertas, Gregorio Valero-Cifuentes, Óscar Pablos, Miriam Maireles, María Luisa Fontalva, Iván Chaves, Aida Orce, Luis Coll-Mesa, Israel Pérez, Fausto González, María Del Carmen Sanz, Isidro Gracia","doi":"10.3390/jcm14093242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite the therapeutic potential of denosumab for the treatment of giant-cell tumors of the bone (GCTBs), there is a lack of standardization in treatment protocols. <b>Methods</b>: We present a multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study conducted across the seven hospitals in Spain affiliated with the DENO Research Group. Seventy-three patients diagnosed with GCTB and treated with denosumab were included and stratified according to treatment strategy-neoadjuvant (<i>n</i> = 38), adjuvant (<i>n</i> = 8), and single treatment (<i>n</i> = 27). <b>Results</b>: Patients in the neoadjuvant group received denosumab for a median of 6.1 months, with reintroduction after surgery in 25.8% of all cases. Among the neoadjuvant patients treated with curettage, recurrence was 35.5%, with no association with denosumab treatment duration (<i>p</i> = 0.274) nor with denosumab reintroduction after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.405). In the adjuvant group, those who completed treatment received denosumab for 15.3 months, while those still undergoing therapy received it for a median of 12.8 months; only one case (12.5%) recurred. Recurrence rates in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies were not different (<i>p</i> = 0.394). Patients treated only with denosumab and no longer on treatment had received it for 34.2 months, with 31.3% recurrence; those still on treatment had received it for 51.8 months, with 25.0% recurrence. Across all strategies, more than 85% of patients reported favorable clinical outcomes, and only 43.8% presented adverse events. No deaths occurred during this study. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although patients who experienced recurrence during neoadjuvant treatment had longer durations of denosumab administration, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, recurrence rates did not differ significantly, whether denosumab was reintroduced after surgery or not. Among the patients treated with curettage, recurrence rates were comparable between neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Discontinuation of the single treatment did not necessarily result in disease progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multicenter Study by the DENO Research Group on the Use of Denosumab in Giant-Cell Tumors of the Bone.\",\"authors\":\"Deno Research Group, Carolina de la Calva, Manuel Angulo, Paula González-Rojo, Ana Peiró, Pau Machado, Juan Luis Cebrián, Roberto García-Maroto, Antonio Valcárcel, Pablo Puertas, Gregorio Valero-Cifuentes, Óscar Pablos, Miriam Maireles, María Luisa Fontalva, Iván Chaves, Aida Orce, Luis Coll-Mesa, Israel Pérez, Fausto González, María Del Carmen Sanz, Isidro Gracia\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm14093242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Despite the therapeutic potential of denosumab for the treatment of giant-cell tumors of the bone (GCTBs), there is a lack of standardization in treatment protocols. <b>Methods</b>: We present a multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study conducted across the seven hospitals in Spain affiliated with the DENO Research Group. Seventy-three patients diagnosed with GCTB and treated with denosumab were included and stratified according to treatment strategy-neoadjuvant (<i>n</i> = 38), adjuvant (<i>n</i> = 8), and single treatment (<i>n</i> = 27). <b>Results</b>: Patients in the neoadjuvant group received denosumab for a median of 6.1 months, with reintroduction after surgery in 25.8% of all cases. Among the neoadjuvant patients treated with curettage, recurrence was 35.5%, with no association with denosumab treatment duration (<i>p</i> = 0.274) nor with denosumab reintroduction after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.405). In the adjuvant group, those who completed treatment received denosumab for 15.3 months, while those still undergoing therapy received it for a median of 12.8 months; only one case (12.5%) recurred. Recurrence rates in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies were not different (<i>p</i> = 0.394). Patients treated only with denosumab and no longer on treatment had received it for 34.2 months, with 31.3% recurrence; those still on treatment had received it for 51.8 months, with 25.0% recurrence. Across all strategies, more than 85% of patients reported favorable clinical outcomes, and only 43.8% presented adverse events. No deaths occurred during this study. <b>Conclusions</b>: Although patients who experienced recurrence during neoadjuvant treatment had longer durations of denosumab administration, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, recurrence rates did not differ significantly, whether denosumab was reintroduced after surgery or not. Among the patients treated with curettage, recurrence rates were comparable between neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Discontinuation of the single treatment did not necessarily result in disease progression.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12072718/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093242\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:尽管denosumab在治疗骨巨细胞肿瘤(GCTBs)方面具有治疗潜力,但治疗方案缺乏标准化。方法:我们提出了一项多中心、回顾性、描述性研究,在西班牙的七家医院进行,隶属于DENO研究小组。纳入73例诊断为GCTB并接受denosumab治疗的患者,并根据治疗策略-新辅助(n = 38),辅助(n = 8)和单一治疗(n = 27)进行分层。结果:新辅助组患者接受denosumab治疗的中位时间为6.1个月,在所有病例中有25.8%的患者在术后重新引入denosumab。在接受刮除治疗的新辅助患者中,复发率为35.5%,与denosumab治疗时间(p = 0.274)和术后再次使用denosumab (p = 0.405)无关。在辅助组中,完成治疗的患者接受denosumab治疗15.3个月,而仍在接受治疗的患者接受denosumab治疗的中位时间为12.8个月;仅1例(12.5%)复发。新辅助治疗与辅助治疗的复发率差异无统计学意义(p = 0.394)。仅接受denosumab治疗且不再接受治疗的患者接受了34.2个月,复发率为31.3%;那些仍在接受治疗的人接受了51.8个月,复发率为25.0%。在所有策略中,超过85%的患者报告了良好的临床结果,只有43.8%的患者出现了不良事件。本研究中未发生死亡病例。结论:虽然在新辅助治疗期间复发的患者地诺单抗给药时间更长,但差异无统计学意义。同样,无论术后是否重新引入地诺单抗,复发率也没有显著差异。在接受刮除治疗的患者中,新辅助治疗和辅助治疗的复发率相当。停止单一治疗并不一定导致疾病进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Multicenter Study by the DENO Research Group on the Use of Denosumab in Giant-Cell Tumors of the Bone.

Background/Objectives: Despite the therapeutic potential of denosumab for the treatment of giant-cell tumors of the bone (GCTBs), there is a lack of standardization in treatment protocols. Methods: We present a multicenter, retrospective, descriptive study conducted across the seven hospitals in Spain affiliated with the DENO Research Group. Seventy-three patients diagnosed with GCTB and treated with denosumab were included and stratified according to treatment strategy-neoadjuvant (n = 38), adjuvant (n = 8), and single treatment (n = 27). Results: Patients in the neoadjuvant group received denosumab for a median of 6.1 months, with reintroduction after surgery in 25.8% of all cases. Among the neoadjuvant patients treated with curettage, recurrence was 35.5%, with no association with denosumab treatment duration (p = 0.274) nor with denosumab reintroduction after surgery (p = 0.405). In the adjuvant group, those who completed treatment received denosumab for 15.3 months, while those still undergoing therapy received it for a median of 12.8 months; only one case (12.5%) recurred. Recurrence rates in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment strategies were not different (p = 0.394). Patients treated only with denosumab and no longer on treatment had received it for 34.2 months, with 31.3% recurrence; those still on treatment had received it for 51.8 months, with 25.0% recurrence. Across all strategies, more than 85% of patients reported favorable clinical outcomes, and only 43.8% presented adverse events. No deaths occurred during this study. Conclusions: Although patients who experienced recurrence during neoadjuvant treatment had longer durations of denosumab administration, the difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, recurrence rates did not differ significantly, whether denosumab was reintroduced after surgery or not. Among the patients treated with curettage, recurrence rates were comparable between neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies. Discontinuation of the single treatment did not necessarily result in disease progression.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信