Sarah M Nielsen, Emily M Russell, Rachel E Ellsworth, Kevin S Hughes, Brandie Heald, Peter D Beitsch, Chad Moretz, Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez, Edward D Esplin, Robert L Nussbaum, Flavia M Facio, Allison W Kurian
{"title":"乳腺癌易感基因变异不确定的女性癌症筛查、预防和治疗的应用","authors":"Sarah M Nielsen, Emily M Russell, Rachel E Ellsworth, Kevin S Hughes, Brandie Heald, Peter D Beitsch, Chad Moretz, Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez, Edward D Esplin, Robert L Nussbaum, Flavia M Facio, Allison W Kurian","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) should not influence clinical management; however, prior studies on breast cancer-related health care utilization in women with VUS versus negative germline genetic test results have shown conflicting findings. This study evaluated whether receipt of a VUS influences breast cancer-related health care utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large study analyzed health care utilization and costs in women who underwent clinical multigene panel testing (MGPT) between 2015 and 2023 at a single commercial laboratory with ≥2 years of health insurance claims data available. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance modalities, as well as the associated health care costs, between women with VUS or negative MGPT results after the return of test findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50,657 eligible women (mean age, 47.7 years), most were White (66.8%), had a family history of cancer (87.0%), and had commercial insurance (71.1%). Among 22,699 patients with breast cancer, those with VUS showed no differences from those with negative results in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance procedures or in the adjusted cost of surgical procedures after genetic testing. Among 27,958 cancer-free women, those with negative results had modestly lower mammography use (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9) compared with those with VUS. Breast cancer screening and treatment costs were no higher for women with VUS versus negative results, but were up to 10 times higher for those with positive results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large, real-world sample of women with breast cancer and without any cancer, use of cancer treatments, surveillance, and risk-reducing measures did not differ between patients with VUS versus negative results, except for modestly higher mammography use. These findings offer reassurance that VUS results do not lead to overutilization or increased cost of health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Treatment in Women With Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah M Nielsen, Emily M Russell, Rachel E Ellsworth, Kevin S Hughes, Brandie Heald, Peter D Beitsch, Chad Moretz, Daniel E Pineda-Alvarez, Edward D Esplin, Robert L Nussbaum, Flavia M Facio, Allison W Kurian\",\"doi\":\"10.6004/jnccn.2025.7011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) should not influence clinical management; however, prior studies on breast cancer-related health care utilization in women with VUS versus negative germline genetic test results have shown conflicting findings. This study evaluated whether receipt of a VUS influences breast cancer-related health care utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This large study analyzed health care utilization and costs in women who underwent clinical multigene panel testing (MGPT) between 2015 and 2023 at a single commercial laboratory with ≥2 years of health insurance claims data available. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance modalities, as well as the associated health care costs, between women with VUS or negative MGPT results after the return of test findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 50,657 eligible women (mean age, 47.7 years), most were White (66.8%), had a family history of cancer (87.0%), and had commercial insurance (71.1%). Among 22,699 patients with breast cancer, those with VUS showed no differences from those with negative results in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance procedures or in the adjusted cost of surgical procedures after genetic testing. Among 27,958 cancer-free women, those with negative results had modestly lower mammography use (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9) compared with those with VUS. Breast cancer screening and treatment costs were no higher for women with VUS versus negative results, but were up to 10 times higher for those with positive results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a large, real-world sample of women with breast cancer and without any cancer, use of cancer treatments, surveillance, and risk-reducing measures did not differ between patients with VUS versus negative results, except for modestly higher mammography use. These findings offer reassurance that VUS results do not lead to overutilization or increased cost of health care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2025.7011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utilization of Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Treatment in Women With Variants of Uncertain Significance in Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes.
Background: The presence of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) should not influence clinical management; however, prior studies on breast cancer-related health care utilization in women with VUS versus negative germline genetic test results have shown conflicting findings. This study evaluated whether receipt of a VUS influences breast cancer-related health care utilization.
Methods: This large study analyzed health care utilization and costs in women who underwent clinical multigene panel testing (MGPT) between 2015 and 2023 at a single commercial laboratory with ≥2 years of health insurance claims data available. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess differences in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance modalities, as well as the associated health care costs, between women with VUS or negative MGPT results after the return of test findings.
Results: Of 50,657 eligible women (mean age, 47.7 years), most were White (66.8%), had a family history of cancer (87.0%), and had commercial insurance (71.1%). Among 22,699 patients with breast cancer, those with VUS showed no differences from those with negative results in the uptake of surgical, therapeutic, risk-reducing, and surveillance procedures or in the adjusted cost of surgical procedures after genetic testing. Among 27,958 cancer-free women, those with negative results had modestly lower mammography use (odds ratio, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-0.9) compared with those with VUS. Breast cancer screening and treatment costs were no higher for women with VUS versus negative results, but were up to 10 times higher for those with positive results.
Conclusions: In a large, real-world sample of women with breast cancer and without any cancer, use of cancer treatments, surveillance, and risk-reducing measures did not differ between patients with VUS versus negative results, except for modestly higher mammography use. These findings offer reassurance that VUS results do not lead to overutilization or increased cost of health care.
期刊介绍:
JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care.
Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship.
JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.