{"title":"临床药师主导的干预对双相I型障碍患者预后的影响:一项随机临床试验。","authors":"Nazanin Gorgzadeh, Niayesh Mohebbi, Kheirollah Gholami, Homayoun Amini, Ali-Akbar Nejatisafa, Jamshid Salamzadeh","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_52_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor medication adherence, drug interactions, and adverse drug events occur frequently in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I), affecting their treatment outcomes. Due to limited research regarding the impact of pharmaceutical care (PC) services in the management of patients with BD-I, this study was designed to assess the role of clinical pharmacist-led interventions on outcomes of BD-I patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized clinical trial was designed, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 48 patients to the control group. Patients in the intervention group were provided with medication therapy management and follow-up services by the clinical pharmacist, whereas the control group only received routine care. Outcomes which were assessed at baseline (before discharge), 1 month, and 3 months after discharge were the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Young Mania Rating Scale, and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Endpoint mean changes in MAI scores from baseline were -5.25 ± 5.19 and 2.02 ± 3.98 points for the intervention and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Depressive symptoms, measured by the BDI-II, also showed significant improvement in the intervention group; the mean change from baseline to 2<sup>nd</sup> follow-up assessment was -1.47 ± 7.73 in the intervention group and 1.66 ± 6.42 in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Furthermore, the mean change from baseline to 2<sup>nd</sup> follow-up in the psychological health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was significantly higher in the intervention group (4.59 ± 17.79) compared with the control group (-3.90 ± 12.55) (<i>P</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that clinical pharmacist-provided services could positively affect outcomes in BD-I patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"13 3","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Clinical Pharmacist-led Interventions on the Outcomes of Patients with Bipolar I Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nazanin Gorgzadeh, Niayesh Mohebbi, Kheirollah Gholami, Homayoun Amini, Ali-Akbar Nejatisafa, Jamshid Salamzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_52_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poor medication adherence, drug interactions, and adverse drug events occur frequently in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I), affecting their treatment outcomes. Due to limited research regarding the impact of pharmaceutical care (PC) services in the management of patients with BD-I, this study was designed to assess the role of clinical pharmacist-led interventions on outcomes of BD-I patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective randomized clinical trial was designed, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 48 patients to the control group. Patients in the intervention group were provided with medication therapy management and follow-up services by the clinical pharmacist, whereas the control group only received routine care. Outcomes which were assessed at baseline (before discharge), 1 month, and 3 months after discharge were the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Young Mania Rating Scale, and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Endpoint mean changes in MAI scores from baseline were -5.25 ± 5.19 and 2.02 ± 3.98 points for the intervention and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Depressive symptoms, measured by the BDI-II, also showed significant improvement in the intervention group; the mean change from baseline to 2<sup>nd</sup> follow-up assessment was -1.47 ± 7.73 in the intervention group and 1.66 ± 6.42 in the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Furthermore, the mean change from baseline to 2<sup>nd</sup> follow-up in the psychological health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was significantly higher in the intervention group (4.59 ± 17.79) compared with the control group (-3.90 ± 12.55) (<i>P</i> = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that clinical pharmacist-provided services could positively affect outcomes in BD-I patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"78-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_52_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_52_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:双相I型情感障碍(BD-I)患者用药依从性差、药物相互作用和药物不良事件频发,影响其治疗效果。由于关于药学服务(PC)对BD-I患者管理影响的研究有限,本研究旨在评估临床药师主导的干预措施对BD-I患者结局的作用。方法:采用前瞻性随机临床试验设计,将59例患者随机分为干预组,48例患者分为对照组。干预组患者由临床药师进行药物治疗管理和随访服务,对照组患者仅接受常规护理。在基线(出院前)、出院后1个月和3个月评估的结果是药物适宜性指数(MAI)、贝克抑郁量表- ii (BDI-II)、青年躁狂症评定量表和世界卫生组织生活质量简要版(WHOQOL-BREF)。结果:干预组和对照组MAI评分与基线相比,终点平均变化分别为-5.25±5.19分和2.02±3.98分(P < 0.001)。BDI-II测量的抑郁症状在干预组也有显著改善;干预组从基线到第二次随访的平均变化为-1.47±7.73,对照组为1.66±6.42 (P = 0.02)。干预组WHOQOL-BREF问卷心理健康领域从基线到第二次随访的平均变化(4.59±17.79)显著高于对照组(-3.90±12.55)(P = 0.005)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,临床药师提供的服务可以积极影响BD-I患者的预后。
Impact of Clinical Pharmacist-led Interventions on the Outcomes of Patients with Bipolar I Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Objective: Poor medication adherence, drug interactions, and adverse drug events occur frequently in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I), affecting their treatment outcomes. Due to limited research regarding the impact of pharmaceutical care (PC) services in the management of patients with BD-I, this study was designed to assess the role of clinical pharmacist-led interventions on outcomes of BD-I patients.
Methods: A prospective randomized clinical trial was designed, and 59 patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 48 patients to the control group. Patients in the intervention group were provided with medication therapy management and follow-up services by the clinical pharmacist, whereas the control group only received routine care. Outcomes which were assessed at baseline (before discharge), 1 month, and 3 months after discharge were the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Young Mania Rating Scale, and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF).
Findings: Endpoint mean changes in MAI scores from baseline were -5.25 ± 5.19 and 2.02 ± 3.98 points for the intervention and control groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Depressive symptoms, measured by the BDI-II, also showed significant improvement in the intervention group; the mean change from baseline to 2nd follow-up assessment was -1.47 ± 7.73 in the intervention group and 1.66 ± 6.42 in the control group (P = 0.02). Furthermore, the mean change from baseline to 2nd follow-up in the psychological health domain of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was significantly higher in the intervention group (4.59 ± 17.79) compared with the control group (-3.90 ± 12.55) (P = 0.005).
Conclusion: Our findings reveal that clinical pharmacist-provided services could positively affect outcomes in BD-I patients.
期刊介绍:
The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.