自制录像在区分功能性癫痫与其他发作性事件中的效用和局限性:一项意大利队列研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70050
Sara Gasparini, Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Adriana Magaudda, Angelo Labate, Angela Laganà, Chiara Martellino, Marina Casazza, Giuseppe Didato, Valentina Chiesa, Maria Paola Canevini, Vincenzo Belcastro, Tommaso Bocci, Elisabetta Domina, Angela La Neve, Stefano Meletti, Marco Poloni, Ettore Salsano, Vittorio Velucci, Stefano Martini, Valentina Bova, Anna Mammì, Angelo Pascarella, Vittoria Cianci, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Umberto Aguglia, Giuseppe Erba
{"title":"自制录像在区分功能性癫痫与其他发作性事件中的效用和局限性:一项意大利队列研究。","authors":"Sara Gasparini,&nbsp;Giorgia Giussani,&nbsp;Elisa Bianchi,&nbsp;Adriana Magaudda,&nbsp;Angelo Labate,&nbsp;Angela Laganà,&nbsp;Chiara Martellino,&nbsp;Marina Casazza,&nbsp;Giuseppe Didato,&nbsp;Valentina Chiesa,&nbsp;Maria Paola Canevini,&nbsp;Vincenzo Belcastro,&nbsp;Tommaso Bocci,&nbsp;Elisabetta Domina,&nbsp;Angela La Neve,&nbsp;Stefano Meletti,&nbsp;Marco Poloni,&nbsp;Ettore Salsano,&nbsp;Vittorio Velucci,&nbsp;Stefano Martini,&nbsp;Valentina Bova,&nbsp;Anna Mammì,&nbsp;Angelo Pascarella,&nbsp;Vittoria Cianci,&nbsp;Edoardo Ferlazzo,&nbsp;Umberto Aguglia,&nbsp;Giuseppe Erba","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (<i>p</i> = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0043).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"918-929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility and limitations of homemade videos in differentiating functional seizures from other paroxysmal events: An Italian cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Sara Gasparini,&nbsp;Giorgia Giussani,&nbsp;Elisa Bianchi,&nbsp;Adriana Magaudda,&nbsp;Angelo Labate,&nbsp;Angela Laganà,&nbsp;Chiara Martellino,&nbsp;Marina Casazza,&nbsp;Giuseppe Didato,&nbsp;Valentina Chiesa,&nbsp;Maria Paola Canevini,&nbsp;Vincenzo Belcastro,&nbsp;Tommaso Bocci,&nbsp;Elisabetta Domina,&nbsp;Angela La Neve,&nbsp;Stefano Meletti,&nbsp;Marco Poloni,&nbsp;Ettore Salsano,&nbsp;Vittorio Velucci,&nbsp;Stefano Martini,&nbsp;Valentina Bova,&nbsp;Anna Mammì,&nbsp;Angelo Pascarella,&nbsp;Vittoria Cianci,&nbsp;Edoardo Ferlazzo,&nbsp;Umberto Aguglia,&nbsp;Giuseppe Erba\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (<i>p</i> = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0043).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"918-929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:区分癫痫发作(ES)与非癫痫事件的金标准是视频脑电图监测。在某些情况下,视频本身可能就足够了,导致家庭视频的使用增加,以支持诊断。本研究旨在评估这种做法的可行性及其与视频脑电图的准确性,以识别功能性癫痫发作(FS)的关键体征和症状,并确定自我报告的问卷是否会提高诊断的准确性。方法:纳入所有连续≥14年出现在6个意大利癫痫中心的复发性不确定发作事件或确诊ES的患者。受试者必须记录下这些事件的家庭录像,并回答特别的调查问卷。去识别的数据被随机分配给对金标准诊断不知情的评估者,一名癫痫学家和一名神经学家,以分两步预测正确的诊断:第一步(单独的家庭录像)和第二步(患者和证人的问卷调查)。结果:94段视频(48 ES;45 FS;1其他),来自36例患者,由16位评论者独立评估,共提供188项评估。全组癫痫医师的诊断准确率为55.3%,神经科医师的诊断准确率为48.9% (p = 0.6892),但FS亚组的诊断准确率(71.1%)明显高于ES (41.7%) (p = 0.0043)。意义:诊断准确性中等,癫痫科医师与神经科医师之间无显著差异,而FS的诊断准确性高于ES。问卷的增加并没有提高准确性。FS的闭眼和ES的突然结束是唯一的诊断标志。因此,自制视频在区分这些疾病方面发挥了作用。摘要:本研究旨在评估家庭录像是否可以区分癫痫发作和功能性发作。来自意大利六个中心的14岁以上的患者录制了他们发作的视频并回答了问卷调查。数据由癫痫学家和神经学家评估。结果显示诊断准确性中等,与癫痫发作相比,功能性发作的准确性更高。主要诊断征象包括功能性发作时闭眼和癫痫发作时突然结束。问卷调查并没有提高准确性。总之,家庭录像可以帮助区分这些事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility and limitations of homemade videos in differentiating functional seizures from other paroxysmal events: An Italian cohort study

Objectives

The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).

Results

Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (p = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (p = 0.0043).

Significance

Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.

Plain Language Summary

This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信