Sara Gasparini, Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Adriana Magaudda, Angelo Labate, Angela Laganà, Chiara Martellino, Marina Casazza, Giuseppe Didato, Valentina Chiesa, Maria Paola Canevini, Vincenzo Belcastro, Tommaso Bocci, Elisabetta Domina, Angela La Neve, Stefano Meletti, Marco Poloni, Ettore Salsano, Vittorio Velucci, Stefano Martini, Valentina Bova, Anna Mammì, Angelo Pascarella, Vittoria Cianci, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Umberto Aguglia, Giuseppe Erba
{"title":"自制录像在区分功能性癫痫与其他发作性事件中的效用和局限性:一项意大利队列研究。","authors":"Sara Gasparini, Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Adriana Magaudda, Angelo Labate, Angela Laganà, Chiara Martellino, Marina Casazza, Giuseppe Didato, Valentina Chiesa, Maria Paola Canevini, Vincenzo Belcastro, Tommaso Bocci, Elisabetta Domina, Angela La Neve, Stefano Meletti, Marco Poloni, Ettore Salsano, Vittorio Velucci, Stefano Martini, Valentina Bova, Anna Mammì, Angelo Pascarella, Vittoria Cianci, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Umberto Aguglia, Giuseppe Erba","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (<i>p</i> = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0043).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":"10 3","pages":"918-929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility and limitations of homemade videos in differentiating functional seizures from other paroxysmal events: An Italian cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Sara Gasparini, Giorgia Giussani, Elisa Bianchi, Adriana Magaudda, Angelo Labate, Angela Laganà, Chiara Martellino, Marina Casazza, Giuseppe Didato, Valentina Chiesa, Maria Paola Canevini, Vincenzo Belcastro, Tommaso Bocci, Elisabetta Domina, Angela La Neve, Stefano Meletti, Marco Poloni, Ettore Salsano, Vittorio Velucci, Stefano Martini, Valentina Bova, Anna Mammì, Angelo Pascarella, Vittoria Cianci, Edoardo Ferlazzo, Umberto Aguglia, Giuseppe Erba\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (<i>p</i> = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (<i>p</i> = 0.0043).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Plain Language Summary</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"918-929\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70050\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/epi4.70050","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Utility and limitations of homemade videos in differentiating functional seizures from other paroxysmal events: An Italian cohort study
Objectives
The gold standard for distinguishing epileptic seizures (ES) from non-epileptic events is video-EEG monitoring. In some cases, video alone might suffice, leading to increased utilization of home videos, to support the diagnosis. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of such practice and its accuracy compared to video-EEG, to identify key signs and symptoms of functional seizure (FS) and to establish if self-reported questionnaires would improve diagnostic accuracy.
Methods
All consecutive patients ≥14 years presenting to six Italian epilepsy centers with either recurrent paroxysmal events of uncertain nature or with confirmed ES were enrolled. Subjects had to record home videos of the events and to respond to ad-hoc questionnaires. De-identified data were randomly assigned to pairs of evaluators blinded to the gold standard diagnosis, one epileptologist and one neurologist, to predict the correct diagnosis in two steps: Step 1 (home video alone) and Step 2 (patient's and witness' questionnaires).
Results
Ninety-four videos (48 ES; 45 FS; 1 other), obtained from 36 patients, were independently evaluated by the 16 reviewers, providing a total of 188 assessments. Diagnostic accuracy for the whole group was 55.3% among epileptologists and 48.9% among neurologists (p = 0.6892) but was significantly higher in the FS subgroup (71.1%) compared to ES (41.7%) (p = 0.0043).
Significance
Diagnostic accuracy was moderate, without significant differences between epileptologists and neurologists, while it was higher for FS compared to ES. The addition of questionnaires did not improve accuracy. Eye closure for FS and abrupt ending for ES emerged as the only diagnostic signs. Thus, homemade videos have a role in differentiating these disorders.
Plain Language Summary
This study aimed to assess if home videos can distinguish epileptic seizures from functional seizures. Patients over 14 years from six Italian centers recorded videos of their episodes and answered questionnaires. Data were evaluated by epileptologists and neurologists. Results showed moderate diagnostic accuracy, with higher accuracy for functional seizures compared to epileptic seizures. Key diagnostic signs included eye closure for functional seizures and abrupt endings for epileptic seizures. Questionnaires did not improve accuracy. In conclusion, home videos can help differentiate these events.