基于模拟的剂量分级研究设计对抗生素PKPD分析的影响评估。

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf057
Raphaël Saporta, Muskan Madan, Lena E Friberg
{"title":"基于模拟的剂量分级研究设计对抗生素PKPD分析的影响评估。","authors":"Raphaël Saporta, Muskan Madan, Lena E Friberg","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of antibiotic dose fractionation study design on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and PKPD model estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PKPD models for meropenem and polymyxin B (PMB) were applied to (i) simulate various dose fractionation studies in mice to derive PK/PD indices and efficacy targets and (ii) perform stochastic simulations and estimations evaluating which efficacy assessment times, in addition to 24 h, would improve the estimation of drug effect parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values of PK/PD indices were primarily influenced by reductions of the dosing intervals for meropenem and by decreases of the lowest total daily dose for PMB. For certain study designs (e.g. frequent administration of higher meropenem doses), <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values for <i>f</i>T > MIC and <i>f</i>AUC/MIC were similar. Efficacy target magnitudes were also sensitive to the selected doses. Additional efficacy assessment times improved parameter accuracy (e.g. 40% reduction in relative root mean squared error of PMB effect slope). The model parameter accuracy was more affected by the selection of time points for meropenem, which included resistance, than for PMB. Efficacy measurements in the first hours after treatment start (e.g. 2 and 6 h), in addition to 24 h, were essential for resistance characterization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of doses and fractionations impacted PK/PD index selection and efficacy target magnitude. Depending on the antibiotic, the dose or fractionation selection appeared to be the most critical. Early treatment efficacy measurements were beneficial to PKPD model-based analyses, particularly to describe resistance processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 2","pages":"dlaf057"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-based evaluation of the impact of dose fractionation study design on antibiotic PKPD analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Raphaël Saporta, Muskan Madan, Lena E Friberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of antibiotic dose fractionation study design on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and PKPD model estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PKPD models for meropenem and polymyxin B (PMB) were applied to (i) simulate various dose fractionation studies in mice to derive PK/PD indices and efficacy targets and (ii) perform stochastic simulations and estimations evaluating which efficacy assessment times, in addition to 24 h, would improve the estimation of drug effect parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values of PK/PD indices were primarily influenced by reductions of the dosing intervals for meropenem and by decreases of the lowest total daily dose for PMB. For certain study designs (e.g. frequent administration of higher meropenem doses), <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> values for <i>f</i>T > MIC and <i>f</i>AUC/MIC were similar. Efficacy target magnitudes were also sensitive to the selected doses. Additional efficacy assessment times improved parameter accuracy (e.g. 40% reduction in relative root mean squared error of PMB effect slope). The model parameter accuracy was more affected by the selection of time points for meropenem, which included resistance, than for PMB. Efficacy measurements in the first hours after treatment start (e.g. 2 and 6 h), in addition to 24 h, were essential for resistance characterization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The choice of doses and fractionations impacted PK/PD index selection and efficacy target magnitude. Depending on the antibiotic, the dose or fractionation selection appeared to be the most critical. Early treatment efficacy measurements were beneficial to PKPD model-based analyses, particularly to describe resistance processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"dlaf057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价抗生素剂量分级研究设计对药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)指标及PKPD模型估计的影响。方法:应用美罗培南和多粘菌素B (PMB)的PKPD模型(i)模拟小鼠不同剂量的分次研究,得出PK/PD指标和功效靶点;(ii)进行随机模拟和估计,评估除24 h外哪些功效评估时间能改善药效参数的估计。结果:PK/PD指标r2值主要受美罗培南给药间隔缩短和PMB最低日总剂量降低的影响。对于某些研究设计(例如,频繁给药较高剂量的美罗培南),fT > MIC和fac /MIC的r2值相似。功效目标量级对所选剂量也很敏感。额外的疗效评估次数提高了参数的准确性(例如,PMB效应斜率的相对均方根误差降低了40%)。与PMB相比,美罗培南(包括耐药性)的时间点选择对模型参数精度的影响更大。除24小时外,治疗开始后第一个小时(例如2和6小时)的疗效测量对耐药性表征至关重要。结论:剂量和部位的选择影响药代动力学指标的选择和药效目标大小。根据抗生素的不同,剂量或分离选择似乎是最关键的。早期治疗效果测量有利于基于PKPD模型的分析,特别是描述耐药过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation-based evaluation of the impact of dose fractionation study design on antibiotic PKPD analyses.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of antibiotic dose fractionation study design on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices and PKPD model estimation.

Methods: PKPD models for meropenem and polymyxin B (PMB) were applied to (i) simulate various dose fractionation studies in mice to derive PK/PD indices and efficacy targets and (ii) perform stochastic simulations and estimations evaluating which efficacy assessment times, in addition to 24 h, would improve the estimation of drug effect parameters.

Results: The R 2 values of PK/PD indices were primarily influenced by reductions of the dosing intervals for meropenem and by decreases of the lowest total daily dose for PMB. For certain study designs (e.g. frequent administration of higher meropenem doses), R 2 values for fT > MIC and fAUC/MIC were similar. Efficacy target magnitudes were also sensitive to the selected doses. Additional efficacy assessment times improved parameter accuracy (e.g. 40% reduction in relative root mean squared error of PMB effect slope). The model parameter accuracy was more affected by the selection of time points for meropenem, which included resistance, than for PMB. Efficacy measurements in the first hours after treatment start (e.g. 2 and 6 h), in addition to 24 h, were essential for resistance characterization.

Conclusions: The choice of doses and fractionations impacted PK/PD index selection and efficacy target magnitude. Depending on the antibiotic, the dose or fractionation selection appeared to be the most critical. Early treatment efficacy measurements were beneficial to PKPD model-based analyses, particularly to describe resistance processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信