拇外翻:患病率和治疗方案。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sarah Ettinger, Fabian T Spindler, Ursula Marschall, Hans Polzer, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Sebastian Felix Baumbach
{"title":"拇外翻:患病率和治疗方案。","authors":"Sarah Ettinger, Fabian T Spindler, Ursula Marschall, Hans Polzer, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Sebastian Felix Baumbach","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hallux valgus is a common deformity. Surgical treatment strategies have evolved markedly in recent years. We report on the administrative prevalence of this condition and the available treatments for it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus and the treatments provided for it in Germany were determined from data supplied by BARMER, a statutory health insurance carrier. The classification and treatment of hallux valgus are outlined in a narrative overview, with particular attention to a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus in Germany is nearly 2%; 83% of the affected persons are women. Over a 6-year period, the number of operations declined, and there was a trend toward outpatient treatment. Hallux valgus should be classified as either mild/moderate or severe. The common surgical procedures achieved comparable correction of the bony deformity. The AOFAS score improved by an average of 33.8 points (95% CI: [30.5; 37.0]) across all surgical techniques, reaching average postoperative values that ranged from 81.4±7.7 and 90.1±4.8 points depending on the particular technique used. The choice of technique and the duration of follow-up had no significant effect on the subjective treatment outcome. The overall complication rate after surgical correction was 18.5%. The common complications were metatarsalgia, recurrent deformity, stiffness of the first metatarsal joint, wound-healing disorders, and hallux varus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary treatment of hallux valgus should be conservative. The various surgical techniques correct the bony deformity with comparable efficacy and good postoperative AOFAS scores. Patients with more severe deformities and greater impairment seem to have a higher potential for improvement in the AOFAS score.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"308-314"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hallux Valgus: Prevalence and Treatment Options.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Ettinger, Fabian T Spindler, Ursula Marschall, Hans Polzer, Christina Stukenborg-Colsman, Sebastian Felix Baumbach\",\"doi\":\"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hallux valgus is a common deformity. Surgical treatment strategies have evolved markedly in recent years. We report on the administrative prevalence of this condition and the available treatments for it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus and the treatments provided for it in Germany were determined from data supplied by BARMER, a statutory health insurance carrier. The classification and treatment of hallux valgus are outlined in a narrative overview, with particular attention to a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus in Germany is nearly 2%; 83% of the affected persons are women. Over a 6-year period, the number of operations declined, and there was a trend toward outpatient treatment. Hallux valgus should be classified as either mild/moderate or severe. The common surgical procedures achieved comparable correction of the bony deformity. The AOFAS score improved by an average of 33.8 points (95% CI: [30.5; 37.0]) across all surgical techniques, reaching average postoperative values that ranged from 81.4±7.7 and 90.1±4.8 points depending on the particular technique used. The choice of technique and the duration of follow-up had no significant effect on the subjective treatment outcome. The overall complication rate after surgical correction was 18.5%. The common complications were metatarsalgia, recurrent deformity, stiffness of the first metatarsal joint, wound-healing disorders, and hallux varus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The primary treatment of hallux valgus should be conservative. The various surgical techniques correct the bony deformity with comparable efficacy and good postoperative AOFAS scores. Patients with more severe deformities and greater impairment seem to have a higher potential for improvement in the AOFAS score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"volume\":\" Forthcoming\",\"pages\":\"308-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Deutsches Arzteblatt international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拇外翻是一种常见的畸形。近年来,外科治疗策略有了显著的发展。我们报告了这种情况的行政患病率和可用的治疗方法。方法:根据德国法定医疗保险公司BARMER提供的资料,确定拇外翻的行政患病率和治疗方法。拇外翻的分类和治疗在叙述概述中概述,特别注意荟萃分析。结果:德国拇外翻行政患病率近2%;受影响的人中有83%是妇女。在6年的时间里,手术次数下降,并且有门诊治疗的趋势。拇外翻应分为轻度/中度或重度。普通外科手术对骨畸形的矫正效果相当。AOFAS评分平均提高33.8分(95% CI: [30.5;37.0]),根据所使用的特定技术,达到81.4±7.7和90.1±4.8分的平均术后值。技术选择和随访时间对主观治疗结果无显著影响。术后总并发症发生率为18.5%。常见的并发症是跖痛、复发性畸形、第一跖关节僵硬、伤口愈合障碍和拇内翻。结论:拇外翻的首选治疗方法为保守治疗。各种手术技术矫正骨畸形的效果相当,术后AOFAS评分良好。畸形更严重、损伤更大的患者在AOFAS评分中似乎有更高的改善潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hallux Valgus: Prevalence and Treatment Options.

Background: Hallux valgus is a common deformity. Surgical treatment strategies have evolved markedly in recent years. We report on the administrative prevalence of this condition and the available treatments for it.

Methods: The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus and the treatments provided for it in Germany were determined from data supplied by BARMER, a statutory health insurance carrier. The classification and treatment of hallux valgus are outlined in a narrative overview, with particular attention to a meta-analysis.

Results: The administrative prevalence of hallux valgus in Germany is nearly 2%; 83% of the affected persons are women. Over a 6-year period, the number of operations declined, and there was a trend toward outpatient treatment. Hallux valgus should be classified as either mild/moderate or severe. The common surgical procedures achieved comparable correction of the bony deformity. The AOFAS score improved by an average of 33.8 points (95% CI: [30.5; 37.0]) across all surgical techniques, reaching average postoperative values that ranged from 81.4±7.7 and 90.1±4.8 points depending on the particular technique used. The choice of technique and the duration of follow-up had no significant effect on the subjective treatment outcome. The overall complication rate after surgical correction was 18.5%. The common complications were metatarsalgia, recurrent deformity, stiffness of the first metatarsal joint, wound-healing disorders, and hallux varus.

Conclusion: The primary treatment of hallux valgus should be conservative. The various surgical techniques correct the bony deformity with comparable efficacy and good postoperative AOFAS scores. Patients with more severe deformities and greater impairment seem to have a higher potential for improvement in the AOFAS score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信