Dexcom G7在重症监护病房的准确性和再现性。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes technology & therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1089/dia.2025.0184
Jesica D Baran, Charles Spanbauer, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Jagdeesh Ullal, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch
{"title":"Dexcom G7在重症监护病房的准确性和再现性。","authors":"Jesica D Baran, Charles Spanbauer, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Jagdeesh Ullal, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch","doi":"10.1089/dia.2025.0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G7 continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a prospective, single-center study in patients with known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia and treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G7 sensors were placed on the abdomen and/or upper arm. Blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained according to usual ICU care were paired with sensor glucose values, and accuracy metrics were analyzed. For further comparison, non-ICU patients were also studied. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The analyses included 30 participants with mean ± standard deviation age of 55 ± 12 years, with preexisting diabetes in 40% and stress hyperglycemia in 60%. A total of 1515 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean difference (bias) was -12 mg/dL (median: -6), and the mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 16% (median: 12%). Mean RAD was 13% (median: 9%) using plasma glucose as the reference and 17% (median: 13%) using capillary glucose. For comparison, in 35 adults with type 2 diabetes in a non-ICU setting, the mean RAD was 15% (median: 13%). No meaningful differences were observed across the duration of time since sensor insertion. No correlation was found between mean RAD and severity of illness. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Mean RAD of the Dexcom G7 sensor in the ICU setting was slightly higher than the outpatient use labeling, but was similar to a non-ICU hospital setting. Further studies are needed to determine whether CGM can be used nonadjunctively in an ICU setting for insulin management, including use of glucose trends and alarms for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"747-752"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dexcom G7 Accuracy and Reproducibility in the Intensive Care Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Jesica D Baran, Charles Spanbauer, Rajlaxmi Bais, Hou-Hsien Chiang, Jing H Chao, Dori Khakpour, Patrisia Panfil, Francisco J Pasquel, Jagdeesh Ullal, Nikola Gligorijevic, Morgan S Jones, Cecilia C Low Wang, John B Buse, Boris Draznin, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Roy W Beck, Irl B Hirsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2025.0184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G7 continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a prospective, single-center study in patients with known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia and treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G7 sensors were placed on the abdomen and/or upper arm. Blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained according to usual ICU care were paired with sensor glucose values, and accuracy metrics were analyzed. For further comparison, non-ICU patients were also studied. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The analyses included 30 participants with mean ± standard deviation age of 55 ± 12 years, with preexisting diabetes in 40% and stress hyperglycemia in 60%. A total of 1515 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean difference (bias) was -12 mg/dL (median: -6), and the mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 16% (median: 12%). Mean RAD was 13% (median: 9%) using plasma glucose as the reference and 17% (median: 13%) using capillary glucose. For comparison, in 35 adults with type 2 diabetes in a non-ICU setting, the mean RAD was 15% (median: 13%). No meaningful differences were observed across the duration of time since sensor insertion. No correlation was found between mean RAD and severity of illness. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Mean RAD of the Dexcom G7 sensor in the ICU setting was slightly higher than the outpatient use labeling, but was similar to a non-ICU hospital setting. Further studies are needed to determine whether CGM can be used nonadjunctively in an ICU setting for insulin management, including use of glucose trends and alarms for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"747-752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2025.0184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价Dexcom G7连续血糖监测仪(CGM)在重症监护病房(ICU)应用的准确性。方法:我们对已知诊断为糖尿病或应激性高血糖并接受胰岛素治疗的患者进行了一项前瞻性、单中心研究。两个Dexcom G7传感器放置在腹部和/或上臂。根据常规ICU护理获得的血糖(BG)测量值与传感器血糖值配对,并分析准确性指标。为了进一步比较,对非icu患者也进行了研究。结果:分析包括30名参与者,平均±标准差年龄为55±12岁,先前存在糖尿病的占40%,应激性高血糖的占60%。总共分析了1515对传感器- bg对。平均差(偏差)为-12 mg/dL(中位数:-6),平均相对绝对差(RAD)为16%(中位数:12%)。以血浆葡萄糖为参考,平均RAD为13%(中位数:9%),以毛细血管葡萄糖为参考,平均RAD为17%(中位数:13%)。相比之下,在非icu环境中的35名2型糖尿病成人中,平均RAD为15%(中位数:13%)。在传感器插入后的持续时间内,没有观察到有意义的差异。平均RAD与疾病严重程度无相关性。结论:Dexcom G7传感器在ICU环境中的平均RAD略高于门诊使用标签,但与非ICU医院环境相似。需要进一步的研究来确定CGM是否可以在ICU环境中非辅助使用胰岛素管理,包括使用血糖趋势和低血糖或高血糖警报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dexcom G7 Accuracy and Reproducibility in the Intensive Care Unit.

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of Dexcom G7 continuous glucose monitor (CGM) in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Methods: We performed a prospective, single-center study in patients with known diagnosis of diabetes or stress hyperglycemia and treated with insulin. Two Dexcom G7 sensors were placed on the abdomen and/or upper arm. Blood glucose (BG) measurements obtained according to usual ICU care were paired with sensor glucose values, and accuracy metrics were analyzed. For further comparison, non-ICU patients were also studied. Results: The analyses included 30 participants with mean ± standard deviation age of 55 ± 12 years, with preexisting diabetes in 40% and stress hyperglycemia in 60%. A total of 1515 sensor-BG pairs were analyzed. The mean difference (bias) was -12 mg/dL (median: -6), and the mean relative absolute difference (RAD) was 16% (median: 12%). Mean RAD was 13% (median: 9%) using plasma glucose as the reference and 17% (median: 13%) using capillary glucose. For comparison, in 35 adults with type 2 diabetes in a non-ICU setting, the mean RAD was 15% (median: 13%). No meaningful differences were observed across the duration of time since sensor insertion. No correlation was found between mean RAD and severity of illness. Conclusions: Mean RAD of the Dexcom G7 sensor in the ICU setting was slightly higher than the outpatient use labeling, but was similar to a non-ICU hospital setting. Further studies are needed to determine whether CGM can be used nonadjunctively in an ICU setting for insulin management, including use of glucose trends and alarms for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信