虚弱与脑卒中康复结果之间的关系:一项队列研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Tania Yeon Jung Cho, H Carl Hanger, Tim J Wilkinson
{"title":"虚弱与脑卒中康复结果之间的关系:一项队列研究。","authors":"Tania Yeon Jung Cho, H Carl Hanger, Tim J Wilkinson","doi":"10.1177/02692155251336700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo assess the independent effect of pre-morbid frailty on stroke rehabilitation outcomes, including mortality, function, and discharge destination.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingInpatient stroke rehabilitation.ParticipantsTwo hundred consecutive stroke patients, 65 years or older, admitted during 2021.Main measuresLogistic regression models analysed binary outcomes (mortality, discharge destination, and significant functional gain), and multiple linear regression models analysed normally distributed continuous outcomes (function, measured by Functional Independence Measure (FIM)). The confounders of age, stroke severity, and pre-morbid dementia/cognitive impairment, were accounted for. Clinical Frailty Scale was the predictor (considered as categorical and dichotomous) for these models.ResultsAfter accounting for the confounders, increased frailty was independently associated with lower discharge FIM (B = -11.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.46-8.18, p < 0.001), smaller FIM change (B = -4.21; 95% CI -6.58-1.84, p < 0.001) and smaller FIM improvements over time (B = -2.36; 95% CI -3.40-1.32, p < 0.001). Frailer patients were less likely to return home (Odds Ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.17-0.41, p < 0.001). Most patients improved function, at all levels of frailty. Stroke severity (Odds Ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p < 0.001), but not frailty, was independently associated with 6-month mortality.ConclusionsPre-morbid frailty was independently associated with lower functional improvement and lower likelihood of discharge back home after stroke rehabilitation, but not with mortality up to 6 months. Measuring both pre-morbid frailty and stroke severity may be useful to provide prognostic information and set realistic expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251336700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between frailty and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: A cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Tania Yeon Jung Cho, H Carl Hanger, Tim J Wilkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251336700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo assess the independent effect of pre-morbid frailty on stroke rehabilitation outcomes, including mortality, function, and discharge destination.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingInpatient stroke rehabilitation.ParticipantsTwo hundred consecutive stroke patients, 65 years or older, admitted during 2021.Main measuresLogistic regression models analysed binary outcomes (mortality, discharge destination, and significant functional gain), and multiple linear regression models analysed normally distributed continuous outcomes (function, measured by Functional Independence Measure (FIM)). The confounders of age, stroke severity, and pre-morbid dementia/cognitive impairment, were accounted for. Clinical Frailty Scale was the predictor (considered as categorical and dichotomous) for these models.ResultsAfter accounting for the confounders, increased frailty was independently associated with lower discharge FIM (B = -11.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.46-8.18, p < 0.001), smaller FIM change (B = -4.21; 95% CI -6.58-1.84, p < 0.001) and smaller FIM improvements over time (B = -2.36; 95% CI -3.40-1.32, p < 0.001). Frailer patients were less likely to return home (Odds Ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.17-0.41, p < 0.001). Most patients improved function, at all levels of frailty. Stroke severity (Odds Ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p < 0.001), but not frailty, was independently associated with 6-month mortality.ConclusionsPre-morbid frailty was independently associated with lower functional improvement and lower likelihood of discharge back home after stroke rehabilitation, but not with mortality up to 6 months. Measuring both pre-morbid frailty and stroke severity may be useful to provide prognostic information and set realistic expectations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155251336700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251336700\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251336700","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估发病前虚弱对脑卒中康复结局的独立影响,包括死亡率、功能和出院目的地。设计:观察性队列研究。住院中风康复。参与者:2021年住院的200名65岁或以上的连续中风患者。主要测量方法logistic回归模型分析了二元结果(死亡率、出院目的地和显著功能增益),多元线性回归模型分析了正态分布的连续结果(功能,通过功能独立性测量(FIM)测量)。考虑了年龄、中风严重程度和发病前痴呆/认知障碍等混杂因素。临床虚弱量表是这些模型的预测因子(被认为是分类和二分类)。结果在考虑混杂因素后,虚弱程度的增加与较低的出院FIM独立相关(B = -11.32;95%置信区间(CI) -14.46-8.18, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between frailty and stroke rehabilitation outcomes: A cohort study.

ObjectiveTo assess the independent effect of pre-morbid frailty on stroke rehabilitation outcomes, including mortality, function, and discharge destination.DesignObservational cohort study.SettingInpatient stroke rehabilitation.ParticipantsTwo hundred consecutive stroke patients, 65 years or older, admitted during 2021.Main measuresLogistic regression models analysed binary outcomes (mortality, discharge destination, and significant functional gain), and multiple linear regression models analysed normally distributed continuous outcomes (function, measured by Functional Independence Measure (FIM)). The confounders of age, stroke severity, and pre-morbid dementia/cognitive impairment, were accounted for. Clinical Frailty Scale was the predictor (considered as categorical and dichotomous) for these models.ResultsAfter accounting for the confounders, increased frailty was independently associated with lower discharge FIM (B = -11.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.46-8.18, p < 0.001), smaller FIM change (B = -4.21; 95% CI -6.58-1.84, p < 0.001) and smaller FIM improvements over time (B = -2.36; 95% CI -3.40-1.32, p < 0.001). Frailer patients were less likely to return home (Odds Ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.17-0.41, p < 0.001). Most patients improved function, at all levels of frailty. Stroke severity (Odds Ratio 1.13; 95% CI 1.06-1.20, p < 0.001), but not frailty, was independently associated with 6-month mortality.ConclusionsPre-morbid frailty was independently associated with lower functional improvement and lower likelihood of discharge back home after stroke rehabilitation, but not with mortality up to 6 months. Measuring both pre-morbid frailty and stroke severity may be useful to provide prognostic information and set realistic expectations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信