Shu-Hui Hsu, Zhaohui Han, Yue-Houng Hu, Dianne Ferguson, Ritchell van Dams, Raymond H Mak, Jonathan E Leeman, Atchar Sudhyadhom
{"title":"mri引导下颅外放疗合成CT生成通用模型的可行性研究。","authors":"Shu-Hui Hsu, Zhaohui Han, Yue-Houng Hu, Dianne Ferguson, Ritchell van Dams, Raymond H Mak, Jonathan E Leeman, Atchar Sudhyadhom","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/add26b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single general model to synthesize CT images across body sites, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, to support treatment planning for MRI-only radiotherapy. A total of 157 patients who received MRI-guided radiation therapy in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis on a 0.35T MRIdian Linac were included. A subset of 122 cases were used for model training and the remaining 35 cases were used for model validation. All patient datasets had semi-paired CT-simulation image and 0.35T MR image acquired using TrueFISP. A conditional generative adversarial network with a multi-planar method was used to generate synthetic CT images from 0.35T MR images. The effect of preprocessing methods (with and without bias field corrections) on the quality of synthetic CT was evaluated and found to be insignificant. The general models trained on all cases performed comparably to the site-specific models trained on individual body sites. For all models, the peak signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 31.7 to 34.9 and the structural index similarity measures ranged from 0.9547 to 0.9758. For the datasets with bias field corrections, the mean-absolute-errors in HU (general model versus site-specific model) were 49.7 ± 9.4 versus 49.5 ± 8.9, 48.7 ± 7.6 versus 43 ± 7.8 and 32.8 ± 5.5 versus 31.8 ± 5.3 for the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, respectively. When comparing plans between synthetic CTs and ground truth CTs, the dosimetric difference was on average less than 0.5% (0.2 Gy) for target coverage and less than 2.1% (0.4 Gy) for organ-at-risk metrics for all body sites with either the general or specific models. Synthetic CT plans showed good agreement with mean gamma pass rates of >94% and >99% for 1%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using a general model for multiple body sites and the potential of using synthetic CT to support an MRI-guided radiotherapy workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility study of a general model for synthetic CT generation in MRI-guided extracranial radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Shu-Hui Hsu, Zhaohui Han, Yue-Houng Hu, Dianne Ferguson, Ritchell van Dams, Raymond H Mak, Jonathan E Leeman, Atchar Sudhyadhom\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/2057-1976/add26b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single general model to synthesize CT images across body sites, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, to support treatment planning for MRI-only radiotherapy. A total of 157 patients who received MRI-guided radiation therapy in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis on a 0.35T MRIdian Linac were included. A subset of 122 cases were used for model training and the remaining 35 cases were used for model validation. All patient datasets had semi-paired CT-simulation image and 0.35T MR image acquired using TrueFISP. A conditional generative adversarial network with a multi-planar method was used to generate synthetic CT images from 0.35T MR images. The effect of preprocessing methods (with and without bias field corrections) on the quality of synthetic CT was evaluated and found to be insignificant. The general models trained on all cases performed comparably to the site-specific models trained on individual body sites. For all models, the peak signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 31.7 to 34.9 and the structural index similarity measures ranged from 0.9547 to 0.9758. For the datasets with bias field corrections, the mean-absolute-errors in HU (general model versus site-specific model) were 49.7 ± 9.4 versus 49.5 ± 8.9, 48.7 ± 7.6 versus 43 ± 7.8 and 32.8 ± 5.5 versus 31.8 ± 5.3 for the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, respectively. When comparing plans between synthetic CTs and ground truth CTs, the dosimetric difference was on average less than 0.5% (0.2 Gy) for target coverage and less than 2.1% (0.4 Gy) for organ-at-risk metrics for all body sites with either the general or specific models. Synthetic CT plans showed good agreement with mean gamma pass rates of >94% and >99% for 1%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using a general model for multiple body sites and the potential of using synthetic CT to support an MRI-guided radiotherapy workflow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add26b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add26b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在探讨单一通用模型的可行性,以综合全身部位、胸部、腹部和骨盆的CT图像,以支持mri放疗的治疗计划。总共有157名患者在0.35T mri直线上接受了mri引导下的胸部、腹部和骨盆放射治疗。其中122例用于模型训练,其余35例用于模型验证。所有患者数据集均有半配对ct模拟图像和使用TrueFISP获取的0.35T MR图像。采用多平面生成条件对抗网络,从0.35T MR图像生成合成CT图像。评估了预处理方法(带和不带偏场校正)对合成CT质量的影响,发现不显著。在所有病例上训练的一般模型与在单个身体部位上训练的特定部位模型的表现相当。各模型的峰值信噪比在31.7 ~ 34.9之间,结构指数相似度在0.9547 ~ 0.9758之间。对于经过偏置场校正的数据集,HU的平均绝对误差(一般模型vs.特定部位模型)分别为49.7±9.4 vs. 49.5±8.9,48.7±7.6 vs. 43±7.8,32.8±5.5 vs. 31.8±5.3。当比较合成ct和真实ct的方案时,无论是一般模型还是特定模型,所有身体部位的靶覆盖率的剂量学差异平均小于0.5% (0.2 Gy),器官危险指标的剂量学差异小于2.1% (0.4 Gy)。合成CT图显示,在1%/1 mm和2%/2 mm范围内,平均伽马通过率分别为>94%和>99%。这项研究证明了在多个身体部位使用通用模型的可行性,以及使用合成CT支持mri引导放射治疗工作流程的潜力。
Feasibility study of a general model for synthetic CT generation in MRI-guided extracranial radiotherapy.
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single general model to synthesize CT images across body sites, thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, to support treatment planning for MRI-only radiotherapy. A total of 157 patients who received MRI-guided radiation therapy in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis on a 0.35T MRIdian Linac were included. A subset of 122 cases were used for model training and the remaining 35 cases were used for model validation. All patient datasets had semi-paired CT-simulation image and 0.35T MR image acquired using TrueFISP. A conditional generative adversarial network with a multi-planar method was used to generate synthetic CT images from 0.35T MR images. The effect of preprocessing methods (with and without bias field corrections) on the quality of synthetic CT was evaluated and found to be insignificant. The general models trained on all cases performed comparably to the site-specific models trained on individual body sites. For all models, the peak signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 31.7 to 34.9 and the structural index similarity measures ranged from 0.9547 to 0.9758. For the datasets with bias field corrections, the mean-absolute-errors in HU (general model versus site-specific model) were 49.7 ± 9.4 versus 49.5 ± 8.9, 48.7 ± 7.6 versus 43 ± 7.8 and 32.8 ± 5.5 versus 31.8 ± 5.3 for the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis, respectively. When comparing plans between synthetic CTs and ground truth CTs, the dosimetric difference was on average less than 0.5% (0.2 Gy) for target coverage and less than 2.1% (0.4 Gy) for organ-at-risk metrics for all body sites with either the general or specific models. Synthetic CT plans showed good agreement with mean gamma pass rates of >94% and >99% for 1%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm, respectively. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using a general model for multiple body sites and the potential of using synthetic CT to support an MRI-guided radiotherapy workflow.
期刊介绍:
BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.