抗精神病药物监测的标准化挑战:来自中国TDM实践的全国性调查的见解。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma
{"title":"抗精神病药物监测的标准化挑战:来自中国TDM实践的全国性调查的见解。","authors":"Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization challenges in antipsychotic drug monitoring: insights from a national survey in Chinese TDM practices.\",\"authors\":\"Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0186\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:治疗药物监测(TDM)对优化抗精神病药物治疗至关重要,但中国实验室间的可比性仍然很差。未标准化的做法可能会导致次优剂量和不良反应,因此需要标准化。本研究评估了六种抗精神病药物(奥氮平、氯氮平、利培酮、喹硫平、阿立哌唑和帕利哌酮)的TDM实践,重点关注实验室间的差异、质量控制材料的适用性和测量系统的差异。方法:将含有6种抗精神病药物的4份血清样品(2份冷冻,2份冻干)分发给100多个实验室。分析采用LC-MS/MS,化学发光免疫分析和HPLC。系统地评估了样品均匀性、稳定性、基质效应、方法精密度和准确度。结果:6种抗精神病药物在实验室间存在显著差异。只有喹硫平符合外部质量评价(EQA)要求,实验室间变异系数(cv)范围为12.08 ~ 15.23 %。其他药物,尤其是奥氮平(CVs: 43.48 ~ 45.30 %)的准确度较差(CVs: bbb15 %)。该研究表明,与实验室开发的测试相比,商业体外诊断试剂盒通常提供更一致的结果。然而,即使使用商业试剂盒,一些药物,如阿立哌唑,仍然显示出很大的偏差。冻干样品在稳定性和EQA适用性方面优于冷冻样品,这在大多数分析系统中表现出可比的基质效应。结论:中国TDM实践急需标准化,包括统一的系统和可追溯的校准器。虽然商业套件增强了结果的一致性,但需要进一步努力协调制造商之间的性能。由于其稳定性和易于运输,冻干材料是EQA的最佳选择。这些发现为提高临床实践中抗精神病性TDM的质量和可比性提供了可行的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardization challenges in antipsychotic drug monitoring: insights from a national survey in Chinese TDM practices.

Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.

Methods: Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.

Results: Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial in vitro diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.

Conclusions: Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信