Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma
{"title":"抗精神病药物监测的标准化挑战:来自中国TDM实践的全国性调查的见解。","authors":"Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2025-0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardization challenges in antipsychotic drug monitoring: insights from a national survey in Chinese TDM practices.\",\"authors\":\"Weiyan Zhou, Jie Zeng, Linhui Zhang, Jiangtao Zhang, Yuhang Deng, Qianwen Zhang, Haoyu Deng, Jing Wang, Haijian Zhao, Chuanbao Zhang, Wenxiang Chen, Jie Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2025-0186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial <i>in vitro</i> diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0186\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardization challenges in antipsychotic drug monitoring: insights from a national survey in Chinese TDM practices.
Objectives: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for optimizing antipsychotic therapy, yet inter-laboratory comparability in China remains poor. Unstandardized practices risk suboptimal dosing and adverse effects, highlighting the need for standardization. This study evaluated TDM practices for six antipsychotics (olanzapine, clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and paliperidone), focusing on inter-laboratory variability, quality control material suitability, and measurement system differences.
Methods: Four processed serum samples (two frozen, two lyophilized) containing the six antipsychotic drugs were distributed to over 100 laboratories. The analyses utilized LC-MS/MS, chemiluminescence immunoassays, and HPLC. Sample homogeneity, stability, matrix effects, and method precision, and accuracy were assessed systematically.
Results: Significant inter-laboratory variability occurred for six antipsychotics. Only quetiapine met the external quality assessment (EQA) requirements, with inter-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12.08 to 15.23 %. Others, especially olanzapine (CVs: 43.48-45.30 %), had poor precision (CVs>15 %). The study revealed that commercial in vitro diagnostic kits generally provided more consistent results compared to laboratory-developed tests. However, even with commercial kits, some drugs, such as aripiprazole, still showed substantial deviations. Lyophilized samples surpassed frozen ones in stability and EQA suitability, which exhibited comparable matrix effects across most assay systems.
Conclusions: Urgent standardization of Chinese TDM practices is needed, including harmonized systems and traceable calibrators. While commercial kits enhance result consistency, further efforts are required to harmonize performance across manufacturers. Lyophilized materials are optimal for EQA due to their stability and ease of transport. These findings offer actionable insights to improve the quality and comparability of antipsychotic TDM in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically.
CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France).
Topics:
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical genomics and molecular biology
- clinical haematology and coagulation
- clinical immunology and autoimmunity
- clinical microbiology
- drug monitoring and analysis
- evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers
- disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes)
- new reagents, instrumentation and technologies
- new methodologies
- reference materials and methods
- reference values and decision limits
- quality and safety in laboratory medicine
- translational laboratory medicine
- clinical metrology
Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!