纳曲酮对纤维肌痛女性脊柱和脊柱上疼痛机制和功能的影响:随机安慰剂对照最终试验的探索性结果

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Karin Due Bruun, Robin Christensen, Kirstine Amris, Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt, Lars Bye-Møller, Marius Henriksen, Tine Alkjaer, Palle Toft, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter
{"title":"纳曲酮对纤维肌痛女性脊柱和脊柱上疼痛机制和功能的影响:随机安慰剂对照最终试验的探索性结果","authors":"Karin Due Bruun, Robin Christensen, Kirstine Amris, Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt, Lars Bye-Møller, Marius Henriksen, Tine Alkjaer, Palle Toft, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter","doi":"10.1007/s40263-025-01183-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The widespread pain and muscular fatigue characteristics of fibromyalgia are believed to be mediated by central mechanisms. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has emerged as a new treatment option for fibromyalgia, possibly modulating central mechanisms via glial or opioid receptors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the randomized, placebo-controlled FINAL trial, 99 women with fibromyalgia were treated with LDN or placebo for 12 weeks. In this secondary analysis, we examined the potential effects of LDN versus placebo on changes from baseline in pain tolerance, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the complete case population (45 versus 47 participants). Measures of muscular fatigue were evaluated using the 30-s chair stand test and a shoulder abduction test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the five examined outcomes, only change in CPM showed a significant between-group difference with greater enhancement following LDN treatment (2.0 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.7 kPa) compared with placebo. Within-group changes in CPM showed an increase of 1.2 kPa (95% CI 0.05-2.4 kPa) in the LDN group and a possible decrease of 0.8 kPa (95% CI - 1.9 to 0.4 kPa) in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant between-group difference in CPM change in favor of LDN. However, this difference was partly explained by a decrease in CPM in the placebo group. Sensitivity analyses showed no association between changes in CPM and clinical pain improvement, suggesting that the group-difference in CPM is a random finding.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0427877; registered on 30 January 2020).</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Naltrexone on Spinal and Supraspinal Pain Mechanisms and Functional Capacity in Women with Fibromyalgia: Exploratory Outcomes from the Randomized Placebo-Controlled FINAL Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Karin Due Bruun, Robin Christensen, Kirstine Amris, Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt, Lars Bye-Møller, Marius Henriksen, Tine Alkjaer, Palle Toft, Anders Holsgaard-Larsen, Henrik Bjarke Vaegter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40263-025-01183-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The widespread pain and muscular fatigue characteristics of fibromyalgia are believed to be mediated by central mechanisms. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has emerged as a new treatment option for fibromyalgia, possibly modulating central mechanisms via glial or opioid receptors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the randomized, placebo-controlled FINAL trial, 99 women with fibromyalgia were treated with LDN or placebo for 12 weeks. In this secondary analysis, we examined the potential effects of LDN versus placebo on changes from baseline in pain tolerance, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the complete case population (45 versus 47 participants). Measures of muscular fatigue were evaluated using the 30-s chair stand test and a shoulder abduction test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the five examined outcomes, only change in CPM showed a significant between-group difference with greater enhancement following LDN treatment (2.0 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.7 kPa) compared with placebo. Within-group changes in CPM showed an increase of 1.2 kPa (95% CI 0.05-2.4 kPa) in the LDN group and a possible decrease of 0.8 kPa (95% CI - 1.9 to 0.4 kPa) in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a significant between-group difference in CPM change in favor of LDN. However, this difference was partly explained by a decrease in CPM in the placebo group. Sensitivity analyses showed no association between changes in CPM and clinical pain improvement, suggesting that the group-difference in CPM is a random finding.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0427877; registered on 30 January 2020).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01183-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-025-01183-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:纤维肌痛的广泛疼痛和肌肉疲劳特征被认为是由中枢机制介导的。低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)已成为纤维肌痛的一种新的治疗选择,可能通过神经胶质或阿片受体调节中枢机制。方法:在随机、安慰剂对照的FINAL试验中,99名患有纤维肌痛的女性接受LDN或安慰剂治疗12周。在这一次要分析中,我们检查了LDN与安慰剂在完整病例人群(45对47)中对疼痛耐受性、疼痛时间累积和条件疼痛调节(CPM)的基线变化的潜在影响。肌肉疲劳的测量采用30-s椅架测试和肩部外展测试进行评估。结果:在五个检查的结果中,只有CPM的变化在LDN治疗后表现出显著的组间差异(2.0 kPa;95%可信区间(CI) 0.4-3.7 kPa)。组内CPM变化显示,LDN组CPM增加1.2 kPa (95% CI 0.05-2.4 kPa),安慰剂组CPM可能减少0.8 kPa (95% CI - 1.9 - 0.4 kPa)。结论:我们发现CPM变化在两组间有显著差异,有利于LDN。然而,这种差异的部分原因是安慰剂组的CPM下降。敏感性分析显示CPM变化与临床疼痛改善之间无关联,提示CPM组差异是随机发现的。研究注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0427877;于2020年1月30日注册)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Naltrexone on Spinal and Supraspinal Pain Mechanisms and Functional Capacity in Women with Fibromyalgia: Exploratory Outcomes from the Randomized Placebo-Controlled FINAL Trial.

Background: The widespread pain and muscular fatigue characteristics of fibromyalgia are believed to be mediated by central mechanisms. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has emerged as a new treatment option for fibromyalgia, possibly modulating central mechanisms via glial or opioid receptors.

Methods: In the randomized, placebo-controlled FINAL trial, 99 women with fibromyalgia were treated with LDN or placebo for 12 weeks. In this secondary analysis, we examined the potential effects of LDN versus placebo on changes from baseline in pain tolerance, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the complete case population (45 versus 47 participants). Measures of muscular fatigue were evaluated using the 30-s chair stand test and a shoulder abduction test.

Results: Of the five examined outcomes, only change in CPM showed a significant between-group difference with greater enhancement following LDN treatment (2.0 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.7 kPa) compared with placebo. Within-group changes in CPM showed an increase of 1.2 kPa (95% CI 0.05-2.4 kPa) in the LDN group and a possible decrease of 0.8 kPa (95% CI - 1.9 to 0.4 kPa) in the placebo group.

Conclusions: We found a significant between-group difference in CPM change in favor of LDN. However, this difference was partly explained by a decrease in CPM in the placebo group. Sensitivity analyses showed no association between changes in CPM and clinical pain improvement, suggesting that the group-difference in CPM is a random finding.

Study registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0427877; registered on 30 January 2020).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS drugs
CNS drugs 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes: - Overviews of contentious or emerging issues. - Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses. - Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. - Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry. - Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信