紧急医疗服务安全护理量表(EMSSCS)的设计与心理测量评估:一项混合方法研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Fateme Mohammadi, Rasoul Salimi, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Salman Khazaei, Mostafa Bijani
{"title":"紧急医疗服务安全护理量表(EMSSCS)的设计与心理测量评估:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Fateme Mohammadi, Rasoul Salimi, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Salman Khazaei, Mostafa Bijani","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01222-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing safe care by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel at the stressful scene of an incident is one of the most crucial factors influencing the preservation and enhancement of patient health. However, culture, attitudes, and social norms can influence the provision of care at the scene of an accident. Consequently, evaluating safe care practices at incident scenes is imperative and necessitates a specialized assessment tool. Presently, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments for measuring safe care practices among EMS personnel. Therefore, this study was designed and conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation employed a mixed-methods design with a sequential exploratory approach, conducted from January 2024 onwards across the southwestern, western, and southeastern regions of Iran. The study was bifurcated into two distinct phases. In the initial phase, a conventional content analysis method was employed to scrutinize the narratives elicited from 41 EMS personnel. In the subsequent phase, the instrument's validity and reliability were rigorously assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Safe care provided by EMS personnel was defined as the management of the incident scene, efficient clinical skills, and effective interaction aimed at delivering principled and safe patient care. Subsequently, based on the derived conceptual framework, a safe care instrument was designed with 44 items across three dimensions. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity 11 items, and face validity 3 items were deleted. Exploratory and confirmatory validity of this scale was approved in three dimensions: \"incident scene management\" (12 items), \"efficient clinical skills\" (10 items), and \"effective interaction\" (8 items). The scale's reliability was reported at 0.95 using Cronbach's alpha method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS), demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Consequently, senior managers in pre-hospital emergency services can utilize this instrument to evaluate safe care practices among pre-hospital emergency medical technicians. They can identify the most appropriate strategies, including educational interventions, to enhance safe care provision at incident scenes when necessary.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and psychometric evaluation of the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS): a mixed-method study.\",\"authors\":\"Fateme Mohammadi, Rasoul Salimi, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Salman Khazaei, Mostafa Bijani\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01222-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Providing safe care by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel at the stressful scene of an incident is one of the most crucial factors influencing the preservation and enhancement of patient health. However, culture, attitudes, and social norms can influence the provision of care at the scene of an accident. Consequently, evaluating safe care practices at incident scenes is imperative and necessitates a specialized assessment tool. Presently, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments for measuring safe care practices among EMS personnel. Therefore, this study was designed and conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This investigation employed a mixed-methods design with a sequential exploratory approach, conducted from January 2024 onwards across the southwestern, western, and southeastern regions of Iran. The study was bifurcated into two distinct phases. In the initial phase, a conventional content analysis method was employed to scrutinize the narratives elicited from 41 EMS personnel. In the subsequent phase, the instrument's validity and reliability were rigorously assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Safe care provided by EMS personnel was defined as the management of the incident scene, efficient clinical skills, and effective interaction aimed at delivering principled and safe patient care. Subsequently, based on the derived conceptual framework, a safe care instrument was designed with 44 items across three dimensions. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity 11 items, and face validity 3 items were deleted. Exploratory and confirmatory validity of this scale was approved in three dimensions: \\\"incident scene management\\\" (12 items), \\\"efficient clinical skills\\\" (10 items), and \\\"effective interaction\\\" (8 items). The scale's reliability was reported at 0.95 using Cronbach's alpha method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS), demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Consequently, senior managers in pre-hospital emergency services can utilize this instrument to evaluate safe care practices among pre-hospital emergency medical technicians. They can identify the most appropriate strategies, including educational interventions, to enhance safe care provision at incident scenes when necessary.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010613/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01222-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01222-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员在紧张的事故现场提供安全护理是影响保护和增强患者健康的最关键因素之一。然而,文化、态度和社会规范可以影响在事故现场提供护理。因此,评估事故现场的安全护理实践是必要的,需要一个专门的评估工具。目前,缺乏可靠和有效的工具来衡量EMS人员的安全护理实践。因此,本研究设计并实施紧急医疗服务安全护理量表(EMSSCS),并进行心理计量学评估。方法:本研究采用混合方法设计和顺序探索方法,从2024年1月起在伊朗西南部、西部和东南部地区进行。这项研究分为两个不同的阶段。在初始阶段,采用传统的内容分析方法对41名EMS人员的叙述进行仔细审查。在后续阶段,对仪器的有效性和可靠性进行了严格的评估。结果:EMS人员提供的安全护理被定义为对事故现场的管理,高效的临床技能和有效的互动,旨在提供原则和安全的患者护理。随后,基于衍生的概念框架,设计了一个包含44个项目的安全护理量表。在定性和定量中,删除了11个内容效度项和3个面孔效度项。量表在“事件现场管理”(12项)、“高效临床技能”(10项)和“有效互动”(8项)三个维度上具有探索性效度和验证性效度。采用Cronbach's alpha方法,量表信度为0.95。结论:紧急医疗服务安全护理量表(EMSSCS)具有可接受的心理测量特性。因此,院前急救服务的高级管理人员可以利用这一工具来评估院前急救医疗技术人员的安全护理实践。他们可以确定最适当的战略,包括教育干预措施,以便在必要时加强事故现场的安全护理。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and psychometric evaluation of the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS): a mixed-method study.

Background: Providing safe care by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel at the stressful scene of an incident is one of the most crucial factors influencing the preservation and enhancement of patient health. However, culture, attitudes, and social norms can influence the provision of care at the scene of an accident. Consequently, evaluating safe care practices at incident scenes is imperative and necessitates a specialized assessment tool. Presently, there is a lack of reliable and valid instruments for measuring safe care practices among EMS personnel. Therefore, this study was designed and conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate the Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS).

Methods: This investigation employed a mixed-methods design with a sequential exploratory approach, conducted from January 2024 onwards across the southwestern, western, and southeastern regions of Iran. The study was bifurcated into two distinct phases. In the initial phase, a conventional content analysis method was employed to scrutinize the narratives elicited from 41 EMS personnel. In the subsequent phase, the instrument's validity and reliability were rigorously assessed.

Results: Safe care provided by EMS personnel was defined as the management of the incident scene, efficient clinical skills, and effective interaction aimed at delivering principled and safe patient care. Subsequently, based on the derived conceptual framework, a safe care instrument was designed with 44 items across three dimensions. During the qualitative and quantitative content validity 11 items, and face validity 3 items were deleted. Exploratory and confirmatory validity of this scale was approved in three dimensions: "incident scene management" (12 items), "efficient clinical skills" (10 items), and "effective interaction" (8 items). The scale's reliability was reported at 0.95 using Cronbach's alpha method.

Conclusion: The Emergency Medical Services Safe Care Scale (EMSSCS), demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. Consequently, senior managers in pre-hospital emergency services can utilize this instrument to evaluate safe care practices among pre-hospital emergency medical technicians. They can identify the most appropriate strategies, including educational interventions, to enhance safe care provision at incident scenes when necessary.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信