Sven van den Bosch, Patricia A H Doornaert, Frank J P Hoebers, Bas Kreike, Marije R Vergeer, Ellen M Zwijnenburg, Maurice C Cox, Gerjon Hannink, Tim Dijkema, Johannes H A M Kaanders
{"title":"减少选择性剂量在头颈部鳞状细胞癌最终放疗中的临床获益和安全性:UPGRADE-RT多中心随机对照试验","authors":"Sven van den Bosch, Patricia A H Doornaert, Frank J P Hoebers, Bas Kreike, Marije R Vergeer, Ellen M Zwijnenburg, Maurice C Cox, Gerjon Hannink, Tim Dijkema, Johannes H A M Kaanders","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2402194"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sven van den Bosch, Patricia A H Doornaert, Frank J P Hoebers, Bas Kreike, Marije R Vergeer, Ellen M Zwijnenburg, Maurice C Cox, Gerjon Hannink, Tim Dijkema, Johannes H A M Kaanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"JCO2402194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02194\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Purpose: Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared.
Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%.
Results: Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group.
Conclusion: This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.