在亚热带沿海植被生态系统中,水生eDNA优于沉积eDNA用于检测河口鱼类群落。

IF 1.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 FISHERIES
Emma Isabelle Rossouw, Sophie von der Heyden, Nasreen Peer
{"title":"在亚热带沿海植被生态系统中,水生eDNA优于沉积eDNA用于检测河口鱼类群落。","authors":"Emma Isabelle Rossouw, Sophie von der Heyden, Nasreen Peer","doi":"10.1111/jfb.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In South Africa, mangrove forests and seagrass meadows often co-occur in estuarine systems and in combination host rich, often endemic biodiversity. There is an urgent need to explore community diversity in coastal vegetated ecosystems, given the degrading effects of climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Environmental DNA metabarcoding is a promising biomonitoring tool in South African coastal ecosystems, although studies highlight the need to optimise and standardise sampling protocols. This study aimed to contribute to developing sampling protocols by understanding the applicability of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding within coastal vegetated habitats and by investigating diversity using two different sample types. Aquatic and sedimentary environmental DNA samples from three estuaries along the east coast of South Africa, in combination with MiFish metabarcoding, detected 148 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) representing 67 fish genera from 50 families, although only 16% were resolved to species. We observed that aquatic eDNA samples detected 97% of the total fish diversity, suggesting that this is an efficient tool to comprehensively detect ichthyofaunal diversity. We did not detect different fish communities between mangroves and seagrasses and our findings underscore the importance of taking hydrological connectivity into consideration for sampling design. Overall, our work reinforces key considerations for future eDNA metabarcoding studies focused on fish fauna in estuaries, and therefore contributes to optimising sampling protocols to support the biomonitoring of coastal biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aquatic eDNA outperforms sedimentary eDNA for the detection of estuarine fish communities in subtropical coastal vegetated ecosystems.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Isabelle Rossouw, Sophie von der Heyden, Nasreen Peer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfb.70056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In South Africa, mangrove forests and seagrass meadows often co-occur in estuarine systems and in combination host rich, often endemic biodiversity. There is an urgent need to explore community diversity in coastal vegetated ecosystems, given the degrading effects of climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Environmental DNA metabarcoding is a promising biomonitoring tool in South African coastal ecosystems, although studies highlight the need to optimise and standardise sampling protocols. This study aimed to contribute to developing sampling protocols by understanding the applicability of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding within coastal vegetated habitats and by investigating diversity using two different sample types. Aquatic and sedimentary environmental DNA samples from three estuaries along the east coast of South Africa, in combination with MiFish metabarcoding, detected 148 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) representing 67 fish genera from 50 families, although only 16% were resolved to species. We observed that aquatic eDNA samples detected 97% of the total fish diversity, suggesting that this is an efficient tool to comprehensively detect ichthyofaunal diversity. We did not detect different fish communities between mangroves and seagrasses and our findings underscore the importance of taking hydrological connectivity into consideration for sampling design. Overall, our work reinforces key considerations for future eDNA metabarcoding studies focused on fish fauna in estuaries, and therefore contributes to optimising sampling protocols to support the biomonitoring of coastal biodiversity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of fish biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.70056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在南非,红树林和海草草甸经常在河口系统中共存,并共同拥有丰富的、往往是地方性的生物多样性。鉴于气候变化和人为压力的退化效应,迫切需要探索沿海植被生态系统的群落多样性。环境DNA元条形码是南非沿海生态系统中一种很有前途的生物监测工具,尽管研究强调需要优化和标准化采样方案。本研究旨在通过了解环境DNA (eDNA)元条形码在沿海植被栖息地的适用性,并通过使用两种不同的样本类型调查多样性,为制定采样方案做出贡献。来自南非东海岸三个河口的水生和沉积环境DNA样本,结合MiFish元条形码,检测到148个操作分类单位(otu),代表50科67个鱼类属,尽管只有16%被分解为物种。我们观察到水生eDNA样本检测了97%的鱼类多样性,这表明这是一种全面检测鱼类多样性的有效工具。我们没有在红树林和海草之间检测到不同的鱼类群落,我们的发现强调了在采样设计中考虑水文连通性的重要性。总的来说,我们的工作加强了未来以河口鱼类区系为重点的eDNA元条形码研究的关键考虑因素,因此有助于优化采样方案,以支持沿海生物多样性的生物监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aquatic eDNA outperforms sedimentary eDNA for the detection of estuarine fish communities in subtropical coastal vegetated ecosystems.

In South Africa, mangrove forests and seagrass meadows often co-occur in estuarine systems and in combination host rich, often endemic biodiversity. There is an urgent need to explore community diversity in coastal vegetated ecosystems, given the degrading effects of climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Environmental DNA metabarcoding is a promising biomonitoring tool in South African coastal ecosystems, although studies highlight the need to optimise and standardise sampling protocols. This study aimed to contribute to developing sampling protocols by understanding the applicability of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding within coastal vegetated habitats and by investigating diversity using two different sample types. Aquatic and sedimentary environmental DNA samples from three estuaries along the east coast of South Africa, in combination with MiFish metabarcoding, detected 148 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) representing 67 fish genera from 50 families, although only 16% were resolved to species. We observed that aquatic eDNA samples detected 97% of the total fish diversity, suggesting that this is an efficient tool to comprehensively detect ichthyofaunal diversity. We did not detect different fish communities between mangroves and seagrasses and our findings underscore the importance of taking hydrological connectivity into consideration for sampling design. Overall, our work reinforces key considerations for future eDNA metabarcoding studies focused on fish fauna in estuaries, and therefore contributes to optimising sampling protocols to support the biomonitoring of coastal biodiversity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of fish biology
Journal of fish biology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
292
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Fish Biology is a leading international journal for scientists engaged in all aspects of fishes and fisheries research, both fresh water and marine. The journal publishes high-quality papers relevant to the central theme of fish biology and aims to bring together under one cover an overall picture of the research in progress and to provide international communication among researchers in many disciplines with a common interest in the biology of fish.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信