用于变量选择和风险预测的正则化胜比回归,并应用于心血管试验。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lu Mao
{"title":"用于变量选择和风险预测的正则化胜比回归,并应用于心血管试验。","authors":"Lu Mao","doi":"10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The win ratio has been widely used in the analysis of hierarchical composite endpoints, which prioritize critical outcomes such as mortality over nonfatal, secondary events. Although a regression framework exists to incorporate covariates, it is limited to low-dimensional datasets and may struggle with numerous predictors. This gap necessitates a robust variable selection method tailored to the win ratio framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose an elastic net-type regularization approach for win ratio regression, extending the proportional win-fractions (PW) model in low-dimensional settings. The method addresses key challenges, including adapting pairwise comparisons to penalized regression, optimizing model selection through subject-level cross-validation, and defining performance metrics via a generalized concordance index. The procedures are implemented in the wrnet R-package, publicly available at https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulation studies demonstrate that wrnet outperforms traditional (regularized) Cox regression for time-to-first-event analysis, particularly in scenarios with differing covariate effects on mortality and nonfatal events. When applied to data from the HF-ACTION trial, the method identified prognostic variables and achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to regularized Cox models, as measured by overall and component-specific concordance indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The wrnet approach combines the interpretability and clinical relevance of the win ratio with the scalability and robustness of elastic net regularization. The accompanying R-package provides a user-friendly interface for routine application of the procedures, whenever appropriate. Future research could explore additional applications or refine the methodology to address non-proportionalities in win-loss risks and nonlinearities in covariate effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"25 1","pages":"102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Mao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The win ratio has been widely used in the analysis of hierarchical composite endpoints, which prioritize critical outcomes such as mortality over nonfatal, secondary events. Although a regression framework exists to incorporate covariates, it is limited to low-dimensional datasets and may struggle with numerous predictors. This gap necessitates a robust variable selection method tailored to the win ratio framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We propose an elastic net-type regularization approach for win ratio regression, extending the proportional win-fractions (PW) model in low-dimensional settings. The method addresses key challenges, including adapting pairwise comparisons to penalized regression, optimizing model selection through subject-level cross-validation, and defining performance metrics via a generalized concordance index. The procedures are implemented in the wrnet R-package, publicly available at https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulation studies demonstrate that wrnet outperforms traditional (regularized) Cox regression for time-to-first-event analysis, particularly in scenarios with differing covariate effects on mortality and nonfatal events. When applied to data from the HF-ACTION trial, the method identified prognostic variables and achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to regularized Cox models, as measured by overall and component-specific concordance indices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The wrnet approach combines the interpretability and clinical relevance of the win ratio with the scalability and robustness of elastic net regularization. The accompanying R-package provides a user-friendly interface for routine application of the procedures, whenever appropriate. Future research could explore additional applications or refine the methodology to address non-proportionalities in win-loss risks and nonlinearities in covariate effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-025-02554-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胜率已被广泛用于分层复合终点的分析,它优先考虑关键结果,如死亡率,而不是非致命的次要事件。虽然存在一个回归框架来合并协变量,但它仅限于低维数据集,并且可能与众多预测因子作斗争。这种差距需要一种适合胜率框架的鲁棒变量选择方法。方法:我们提出了一种弹性网络型正则化方法用于胜率回归,扩展了低维环境下的比例赢分数(PW)模型。该方法解决了关键挑战,包括使两两比较适应惩罚回归,通过受试者水平交叉验证优化模型选择,以及通过广义一致性指数定义性能指标。结果:模拟研究表明,对于首次事件的时间分析,特别是在对死亡率和非致命事件具有不同协变量影响的情况下,wrnet优于传统的(正则化的)Cox回归。当应用于HF-ACTION试验的数据时,该方法识别了预后变量,并通过总体和特定成分的一致性指数来衡量,与正则化Cox模型相比,该方法获得了更高的预测准确性。结论:wrnet方法结合了胜率的可解释性和临床相关性以及弹性网络正则化的可扩展性和鲁棒性。随附的r包为程序的日常应用提供了一个用户友好的界面,只要合适。未来的研究可以探索更多的应用或改进方法,以解决非比例的赢输风险和非线性的协变量效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regularized win ratio regression for variable selection and risk prediction, with an application to a cardiovascular trial.

Background: The win ratio has been widely used in the analysis of hierarchical composite endpoints, which prioritize critical outcomes such as mortality over nonfatal, secondary events. Although a regression framework exists to incorporate covariates, it is limited to low-dimensional datasets and may struggle with numerous predictors. This gap necessitates a robust variable selection method tailored to the win ratio framework.

Methods: We propose an elastic net-type regularization approach for win ratio regression, extending the proportional win-fractions (PW) model in low-dimensional settings. The method addresses key challenges, including adapting pairwise comparisons to penalized regression, optimizing model selection through subject-level cross-validation, and defining performance metrics via a generalized concordance index. The procedures are implemented in the wrnet R-package, publicly available at https://lmaowisc.github.io/wrnet/ .

Results: Simulation studies demonstrate that wrnet outperforms traditional (regularized) Cox regression for time-to-first-event analysis, particularly in scenarios with differing covariate effects on mortality and nonfatal events. When applied to data from the HF-ACTION trial, the method identified prognostic variables and achieved superior predictive accuracy compared to regularized Cox models, as measured by overall and component-specific concordance indices.

Conclusion: The wrnet approach combines the interpretability and clinical relevance of the win ratio with the scalability and robustness of elastic net regularization. The accompanying R-package provides a user-friendly interface for routine application of the procedures, whenever appropriate. Future research could explore additional applications or refine the methodology to address non-proportionalities in win-loss risks and nonlinearities in covariate effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信