Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi
{"title":"心电图像分析软件在急诊科人群中检测左心室功能障碍的跨种族验证。","authors":"Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interethnic Validation of an ECG Image Analysis Software for Detecting Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Emergency Department Population.\",\"authors\":\"Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.24.342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interethnic Validation of an ECG Image Analysis Software for Detecting Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Emergency Department Population.
Objective: We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.
Methods: We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.
Results: A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).
Conclusion: ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.