心电图像分析软件在急诊科人群中检测左心室功能障碍的跨种族验证。

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi
{"title":"心电图像分析软件在急诊科人群中检测左心室功能障碍的跨种族验证。","authors":"Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interethnic Validation of an ECG Image Analysis Software for Detecting Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Emergency Department Population.\",\"authors\":\"Haemin Lee, Woon Yong Kwon, Kyoung Jun Song, You Hwan Jo, Joonghee Kim, Youngjin Cho, Ji Eun Hwang, Yeongho Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.24.342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们之前在韩国人群中开发并验证了一种基于人工智能的ECG分析工具(ECG Buddy)。本研究旨在验证其在美国人群中的表现,特别是评估其左室(LV)功能障碍评分和左室射血分数(LVEF)-ECG特征预测LVEF的方法:我们从MIMIC-IV数据集中确定了具有LVEF信息的急诊科(ED)访问量。LV功能障碍评分的AUC为0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 ~ 0.910),敏感性为85.4%,特异性为80.8%。LVEF-ECG特征的AUC为0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 ~ 0.913),敏感性83.5%,特异性83.0%。NT-ProBNP的AUC为0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 ~ 0.752),敏感性为74.8%,特异性为62.0%。结论:与NT-ProBNP相比,ECG Buddy在预测左室收缩功能障碍方面表现出更高的准确性,验证了其在美国ED人群中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interethnic Validation of an ECG Image Analysis Software for Detecting Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Emergency Department Population.

Objective: We previously developed and validated an AI-based ECG analysis tool (ECG Buddy) in a Korean population. This study aims to validate its performance in a U.S. population, specifically assessing its left ventricular (LV) Dysfunction Score and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)-ECG feature for predicting LVEF <40%, using N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-ProBNP) as a comparator.

Methods: We identified emergency department (ED) visits from the MIMIC-IV dataset with information on LVEF <40% or ≥40%, along with matched 12-lead ECG data recorded within 48 hours of the ED visit. The performance of ECG Buddy's LV Dysfunction Score and LVEF-ECG feature was compared with NT-ProBNP using Receiver Operating Characteristic - Area Under the Curve (ROCAUC) analysis.

Results: A total of 22,599 ED visits were analyzed. The LV Dysfunction Score had an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI: 0.899 - 0.910), with a sensitivity of 85.4% and specificity of 80.8%. The LVEF-ECG feature had an AUC of 0.908 (95% CI: 0.902 - 0.913), sensitivity 83.5%, and specificity 83.0%. NT-ProBNP had an AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.727 - 0.752), with a sensitivity of 74.8% and specificity of 62.0%. The ECG-based predictors demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to NT-ProBNP (all p<0.001). In the Sinus Rhythm subgroup, the LV Dysfunction Score achieved an AUC of 0.913, and LVEF-ECG had an AUC of 0.917, both outperforming NT-ProBNP (0.748, 95% CI: 0.732 - 0.763, all p<0.001).

Conclusion: ECG Buddy demonstrated superior accuracy compared to NT-ProBNP in predicting LV systolic dysfunction, validating its utility in a U.S. ED population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信