乳腺癌筛查中自我报告检查指征的准确性。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler
{"title":"乳腺癌筛查中自我报告检查指征的准确性。","authors":"Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkaf046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与电子健康记录(EHR)相比,我们验证了更新的国家健康访谈调查中关于乳房x光检查适应症的问题。我们询问了244名年龄在40-74岁、符合乳腺癌筛查条件的华盛顿凯撒医疗机构成员,使用一系列新的分层是/否问题,让他们自我报告最近一次乳房x光检查的原因。我们首先询问他们是否因为健康问题而进行乳房x光检查,然后作为后续检查,最后进行筛查。我们将自我报告的原因与两个EHR数据集进行了比较:程序/诊断代码和放射科医生定义的适应症。健康问题的自我报告检查与规范的一致性为89.2%,与放射科医生定义的适应症的一致性为92.2%。自我报告的随访检查与符码的一致性为87.5%,与放射科医师定义的适应症的一致性为89.3%。自我报告的筛查检查与符码的一致性为91.4%,与放射科医师定义的适应症的一致性为95.7%。当使用这种新颖的分层方法询问时,自我报告的乳房x光检查指征与程序/诊断代码和放射科医生报告的指征有很好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.

We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信