Kelsey Baron, Eric Anto, John Esther, Victoria A Vardell, Lisa Pappas, Allison Bock, Daniel A Ermann, Lindsey A Fitzgerald, Boyu Hu, Harsh R Shah
{"title":"BR与rchop样方案治疗滤泡性淋巴瘤患者实际预后的比较","authors":"Kelsey Baron, Eric Anto, John Esther, Victoria A Vardell, Lisa Pappas, Allison Bock, Daniel A Ermann, Lindsey A Fitzgerald, Boyu Hu, Harsh R Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade (G) 1-3A who meet treatment criteria are commonly treated with chemo-immunotherapy regimens such as bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (RCHOP). Two prospective trials have compared BR to RCHOP-like regimens and showed improved progression free survival with BR in FL G1-2 patients. However, in real-world practice, there is clinical variability in utilization of BR versus RCHOP-like regimens. Additionally, the optimal treatment for patients with FL G3A remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database to compare outcomes in 2089 patients with FL G1-3A treated with frontline BR versus RCHOP-like regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated clinical improvement in time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) with BR (median 96 vs. 78 months, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.986-1.332, P = .086), albeit not statistically significant. No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Maintenance rituximab was associated with improved TTNTD and OS. Among G3A patients (N = 304), TTNTD was comparable between the 2 regimens, however OS was significantly improved with RCHOP-like regimens in univariate analysis (median 138 vs. 96 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.313-0.834, P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this study of real-world patients supports the use of BR and rituximab maintenance for front-line treatment of FL. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal treatment for FL G3A.</p>","PeriodicalId":10348,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Real-World Outcomes in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Treated With BR Versus RCHOP-Like Regimens.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Baron, Eric Anto, John Esther, Victoria A Vardell, Lisa Pappas, Allison Bock, Daniel A Ermann, Lindsey A Fitzgerald, Boyu Hu, Harsh R Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade (G) 1-3A who meet treatment criteria are commonly treated with chemo-immunotherapy regimens such as bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (RCHOP). Two prospective trials have compared BR to RCHOP-like regimens and showed improved progression free survival with BR in FL G1-2 patients. However, in real-world practice, there is clinical variability in utilization of BR versus RCHOP-like regimens. Additionally, the optimal treatment for patients with FL G3A remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database to compare outcomes in 2089 patients with FL G1-3A treated with frontline BR versus RCHOP-like regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrated clinical improvement in time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) with BR (median 96 vs. 78 months, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.986-1.332, P = .086), albeit not statistically significant. No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Maintenance rituximab was associated with improved TTNTD and OS. Among G3A patients (N = 304), TTNTD was comparable between the 2 regimens, however OS was significantly improved with RCHOP-like regimens in univariate analysis (median 138 vs. 96 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.313-0.834, P = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this study of real-world patients supports the use of BR and rituximab maintenance for front-line treatment of FL. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal treatment for FL G3A.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2025.03.017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:符合治疗标准的滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)级(G) 1-3A患者通常采用化学免疫治疗方案,如苯达莫司汀+利妥昔单抗(BR)或利妥昔单抗+环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、强的松(RCHOP)。两项前瞻性试验将BR与rchop样方案进行了比较,结果显示FL G1-2患者BR可改善无进展生存期。然而,在现实世界的实践中,BR与rchop样方案的应用存在临床差异。此外,FL G3A患者的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。方法:我们使用一个全国性的电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库来比较2089例FL G1-3A患者接受一线BR和rchop样方案治疗的结果。结果:我们证实了BR在下一次治疗或死亡时间(TTNTD)方面的临床改善(中位96个月vs. 78个月,HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.986-1.332, P = 0.086),尽管没有统计学意义。总生存期(OS)无差异。维持性利妥昔单抗与TTNTD和OS改善相关。在G3A患者(N = 304)中,两种方案之间的TTNTD具有可比性,但在单因素分析中,rchop样方案显著改善了OS(中位138个月vs. 96个月,HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.313-0.834, P = 0.007)。结论:总之,本研究对现实世界患者的研究支持使用BR和利妥昔单抗维持治疗FL的一线治疗,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来确定FL G3A的理想治疗方法。
Comparison of Real-World Outcomes in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma Treated With BR Versus RCHOP-Like Regimens.
Background: Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade (G) 1-3A who meet treatment criteria are commonly treated with chemo-immunotherapy regimens such as bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) or rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (RCHOP). Two prospective trials have compared BR to RCHOP-like regimens and showed improved progression free survival with BR in FL G1-2 patients. However, in real-world practice, there is clinical variability in utilization of BR versus RCHOP-like regimens. Additionally, the optimal treatment for patients with FL G3A remains unclear.
Methods: We used a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database to compare outcomes in 2089 patients with FL G1-3A treated with frontline BR versus RCHOP-like regimens.
Results: We demonstrated clinical improvement in time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) with BR (median 96 vs. 78 months, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.986-1.332, P = .086), albeit not statistically significant. No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed. Maintenance rituximab was associated with improved TTNTD and OS. Among G3A patients (N = 304), TTNTD was comparable between the 2 regimens, however OS was significantly improved with RCHOP-like regimens in univariate analysis (median 138 vs. 96 months, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.313-0.834, P = .007).
Conclusions: In conclusion, this study of real-world patients supports the use of BR and rituximab maintenance for front-line treatment of FL. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the ideal treatment for FL G3A.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is a peer-reviewed monthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and related disorders including macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, and plasma-cell dyscrasias. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lymphoma, myeloma and leukemia. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.