{"title":"评估肩关节不稳患者的前后抽屉试验的内部和内部可靠性。","authors":"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Patricio Lopez-Tarrida, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo","doi":"10.1177/02692155251339380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251339380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability.\",\"authors\":\"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Patricio Lopez-Tarrida, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251339380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155251339380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251339380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251339380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability.
BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was excellent (weighted Kappa = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was good for the anterior drawer: weighted Kappa = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, weighted Kappa = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and weighted Kappa = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: weighted Kappa = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), weighted Kappa = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and weighted Kappa = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and good inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)