评估肩关节不稳患者的前后抽屉试验的内部和内部可靠性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Patricio Lopez-Tarrida, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo
{"title":"评估肩关节不稳患者的前后抽屉试验的内部和内部可靠性。","authors":"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Patricio Lopez-Tarrida, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo","doi":"10.1177/02692155251339380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251339380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability.\",\"authors\":\"Rocio Aldon-Villegas, Gema Chamorro-Moriana, Patricio Lopez-Tarrida, Maria-Luisa Benitez-Lugo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251339380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was <i>excellent (weighted Kappa</i> = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was <i>good</i> for the anterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and <i>weighted Kappa</i> = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated <i>excellent</i> intra-rater and <i>good</i> inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155251339380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251339380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251339380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然主要是在健康受试者中分析,但著名的评估肩关节松弛和不稳定的抽屉试验显示出适当的可靠性。目的评价前、后抽屉试验在肩关节不稳患者中的内、间可靠性。根据COSMIN的建议和gras检查表,对抽屉测试的内部和内部可靠性进行了测量学研究。设有设备齐全的评估中心。参与者105名参与者(69名男性/36名女性),年龄在18至60岁之间,至少有一个肩膀出现不稳定症状。每位参与者都接受了双边评估。样品由210个肩膀组成,不稳定且健康。介入:前后抽屉试验。主要测量方法:采用抽屉测试对数字翻译进行评估,并采用Hawkins量表、修正Hawkins量表和二分法(正/负)进行评分。进行了两个阶段(7至14天的洗脱期):每个患者在第一个阶段由两名审查员评估,在第二个阶段由其中一名审查员评估。加权Kappa分析了信度。结果采用Hawkins量表,前后抽屉试验的信度均较好(加权Kappa = 1)。前抽屉的评分间信度较好:Hawkins量表加权Kappa = 0.76(95%可信区间:0.67 ~ 0.85),修正Hawkins量表加权Kappa = 0.78(95%可信区间:0.69 ~ 0.87),二分类加权Kappa = 0.80(95%可信区间:0.71 ~ 0.89);后抽屉:加权Kappa = 0.62(95%置信区间:0.52 ~ 0.72),加权Kappa = 0.67(95%置信区间:0.57 ~ 0.78),加权Kappa = 0.70(95%置信区间:0.59 ~ 0.80)。结论抽屉试验显示有肩关节不稳症状的受试者具有良好的评定器内信度和评定器间信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests for the assessment of people with shoulder instability.

BackgroundThe well-known drawer tests to assess glenohumeral laxity and instability have shown appropriate reliability, although analysed mainly in healthy subjects.ObjectiveTo evaluate the intra- and inter-rater reliability of anterior and posterior drawer tests in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.DesignClinometric study of intra- and inter-rater reliability of drawer tests was carried out following COSMIN recommendations and GRRAS checklist.SettingCentres with equipped facilities for assessments.ParticipantsThere were 105 participants (69 male/36 female) aged 18 to 60 years with instability symptoms in at least one shoulder. Each participant underwent bilateral assessments. The sample consists of 210 shoulders, unstable and healthy.InterventionAnterior and posterior drawer tests.Main measuresHumeral translations were assessed using drawer tests and graded with Hawkins scale, modified Hawkins and dichotomising (positive/negative). Two sessions were performed (seven to fourteen-day washout period): Each patient was evaluated by two examiners in the first session and by one of them in the second. Weighted Kappa analysed the reliability.ResultsThe intra-rater reliability of the anterior and posterior drawer tests was excellent (weighted Kappa = 1) with the Hawkins scale. Inter-rater reliability was good for the anterior drawer: weighted Kappa = 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.67-0.85) with the Hawkins scale, weighted Kappa = 0.78 (95%confidence interval: 0.69-0.87) with modified Hawkins, and weighted Kappa = 0.80 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.89) dichotomising; and for the posterior drawer: weighted Kappa = 0.62 (95%confidence interval: 0.52-0.72), weighted Kappa = 0.67 (95%confidence interval: 0.57-0.78), and weighted Kappa = 0.70 (95%confidence interval: 0.59-0.80), respectively.ConclusionDrawer tests demonstrated excellent intra-rater and good inter-rater reliability in subjects with symptoms of shoulder instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
Clinical Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
117
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信