Aram A Musaelyan, Svetlana V Odintsova, Magaripa A Urtenova, Ekaterina P Solovyova, Liliana V Kindyalova, Sergey V Orlov
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂再挑战和节拍环磷酰胺联合或不联合贝伐单抗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的疗效","authors":"Aram A Musaelyan, Svetlana V Odintsova, Magaripa A Urtenova, Ekaterina P Solovyova, Liliana V Kindyalova, Sergey V Orlov","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide, with or without bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the clinical characteristics associated with the response to the therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 43 patients with metastatic NSCLC who responded to ICIs for ≥4 months and subsequently experienced disease progression. The patients then underwent ICI rechallenge along with either oral cyclophosphamide daily alone (n = 24) or cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combining ICI with cyclophosphamide resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 16.7%, disease control rate (DCR) of 75.0%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.8 months, and overall survival (OS) of 15.4 months. Oral cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab cohort achieved an ORR of 26.3%, a DCR of 78.9%, a PFS of 6.8 months, and an OS of 17.6 months. No treatment-related adverse events resulted in the discontinuation of the study therapy in either cohort. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of an objective response to initial ICIs (OS: P = 0.016), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (PFS: P = 0.017, OS: P = 0.032), and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3.8 (PFS: P = 0.004, OS: P = 0.007) were negative predictors of rechallenge therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination showed promising antitumor activity and a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with ICI-pretreated NSCLC. Furthermore, ECOG PS 0-1, objective response, and NLR ≤ 3.8 were predictive of the efficacy of the study therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge and metronomic cyclophosphamide with or without bevacizumab in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Aram A Musaelyan, Svetlana V Odintsova, Magaripa A Urtenova, Ekaterina P Solovyova, Liliana V Kindyalova, Sergey V Orlov\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide, with or without bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the clinical characteristics associated with the response to the therapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 43 patients with metastatic NSCLC who responded to ICIs for ≥4 months and subsequently experienced disease progression. The patients then underwent ICI rechallenge along with either oral cyclophosphamide daily alone (n = 24) or cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (n = 19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Combining ICI with cyclophosphamide resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 16.7%, disease control rate (DCR) of 75.0%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.8 months, and overall survival (OS) of 15.4 months. Oral cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab cohort achieved an ORR of 26.3%, a DCR of 78.9%, a PFS of 6.8 months, and an OS of 17.6 months. No treatment-related adverse events resulted in the discontinuation of the study therapy in either cohort. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of an objective response to initial ICIs (OS: P = 0.016), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (PFS: P = 0.017, OS: P = 0.032), and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3.8 (PFS: P = 0.004, OS: P = 0.007) were negative predictors of rechallenge therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination showed promising antitumor activity and a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with ICI-pretreated NSCLC. Furthermore, ECOG PS 0-1, objective response, and NLR ≤ 3.8 were predictive of the efficacy of the study therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anti-Cancer Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anti-Cancer Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)再挑战联合节拍器环磷酰胺,联合或不联合贝伐单抗治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效,并探讨与该治疗反应相关的临床特征。材料和方法:该研究纳入了43例转移性NSCLC患者,这些患者对ICIs有反应≥4个月,随后出现疾病进展。然后患者接受ICI再挑战,每日单独口服环磷酰胺(n = 24)或环磷酰胺和贝伐单抗(n = 19)。结果:ICI联合环磷酰胺治疗的客观缓解率(ORR)为16.7%,疾病控制率(DCR)为75.0%,中位无进展生存期(PFS)为5.8个月,总生存期(OS)为15.4个月。口服环磷酰胺和贝伐单抗队列的ORR为26.3%,DCR为78.9%,PFS为6.8个月,OS为17.6个月。两组患者均未发生治疗相关不良事件导致研究治疗中断。多因素分析表明,对初始ICIs缺乏客观反应(OS: P = 0.016),东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(ECOG PS)差(PFS: P = 0.017, OS: P = 0.032),中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)≥3.8 (PFS: P = 0.004, OS: P = 0.007)是再挑战治疗的负面预测因素。结论:该组合在ici预处理的非小细胞肺癌患者中显示出良好的抗肿瘤活性和耐受性。此外,ECOG PS 0-1、客观反应和NLR≤3.8可预测研究治疗的疗效。
Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge and metronomic cyclophosphamide with or without bevacizumab in metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer.
Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) rechallenge in combination with metronomic cyclophosphamide, with or without bevacizumab, in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to investigate the clinical characteristics associated with the response to the therapy.
Materials and methods: The study included 43 patients with metastatic NSCLC who responded to ICIs for ≥4 months and subsequently experienced disease progression. The patients then underwent ICI rechallenge along with either oral cyclophosphamide daily alone (n = 24) or cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab (n = 19).
Results: Combining ICI with cyclophosphamide resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 16.7%, disease control rate (DCR) of 75.0%, median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.8 months, and overall survival (OS) of 15.4 months. Oral cyclophosphamide and bevacizumab cohort achieved an ORR of 26.3%, a DCR of 78.9%, a PFS of 6.8 months, and an OS of 17.6 months. No treatment-related adverse events resulted in the discontinuation of the study therapy in either cohort. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the absence of an objective response to initial ICIs (OS: P = 0.016), poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) (PFS: P = 0.017, OS: P = 0.032), and a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3.8 (PFS: P = 0.004, OS: P = 0.007) were negative predictors of rechallenge therapy.
Conclusion: The combination showed promising antitumor activity and a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with ICI-pretreated NSCLC. Furthermore, ECOG PS 0-1, objective response, and NLR ≤ 3.8 were predictive of the efficacy of the study therapy.
期刊介绍:
Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.