通过标准化的导尿管放置方案改善神经外科患者的术后护理:一项多中心实施前后研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jeanne-Marie Nollen, Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders, Ewout W Steyerberg, Wilco Peul, Wouter R van Furth
{"title":"通过标准化的导尿管放置方案改善神经外科患者的术后护理:一项多中心实施前后研究。","authors":"Jeanne-Marie Nollen, Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders, Ewout W Steyerberg, Wilco Peul, Wouter R van Furth","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary catheterisation, including indwelling and clean intermittent catheterisation, is common in perioperative and postoperative care. Despite guidelines, practice variation is significant. Inappropriate catheterisation risks include urinary tract infections and reduced mobility, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased antibiotic use. This study aims to improve postoperative care through appropriate catheterisation in neurosurgical groups frequently subjected to catheterisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre, before-and-after study in four Dutch hospitals from June 2021 to January 2023, including adult neurosurgical patients who underwent pituitary gland tumour or spinal fusion surgery. Exclusion criteria included conditions requiring chronic catheter use. A multifaceted strategy was implemented, focusing on a uniform protocol, an educational programme and department-specific champions. The primary outcome was inappropriate catheterisation, analysed with ordinal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included total catheterisations, urinary tract infections and length of hospital stay. Ethical approval was obtained. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and SQUIRE checklists were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3439 patients screened, 2711 were included, with 544 in the after group. The percentage of patients without inappropriate indwelling catheterisation increased from 46% to 57%, and the proportion without inappropriate clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 34% to 67%. Additionally, overall catheter use decreased: the percentage of patients not receiving an indwelling catheter increased from 54% to 64%, while those not requiring clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 89% to 92%. Infection rates and hospital stay were similar (1.4% and 1.3%; 4.9 and 5.1 days, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a uniform protocol may significantly reduce inappropriate and overall catheterisation in neurosurgical patients, aligning with patient-centred, less invasive healthcare. Ongoing education and adherence to standardised protocols are crucial. Future research should assess the long-term sustainability of these strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020749/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving postoperative care for neurosurgical patients by a standardised protocol for urinary catheter placement: a multicentre before-and-after implementation study.\",\"authors\":\"Jeanne-Marie Nollen, Anja H Brunsveld-Reinders, Ewout W Steyerberg, Wilco Peul, Wouter R van Furth\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urinary catheterisation, including indwelling and clean intermittent catheterisation, is common in perioperative and postoperative care. Despite guidelines, practice variation is significant. Inappropriate catheterisation risks include urinary tract infections and reduced mobility, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased antibiotic use. This study aims to improve postoperative care through appropriate catheterisation in neurosurgical groups frequently subjected to catheterisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre, before-and-after study in four Dutch hospitals from June 2021 to January 2023, including adult neurosurgical patients who underwent pituitary gland tumour or spinal fusion surgery. Exclusion criteria included conditions requiring chronic catheter use. A multifaceted strategy was implemented, focusing on a uniform protocol, an educational programme and department-specific champions. The primary outcome was inappropriate catheterisation, analysed with ordinal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included total catheterisations, urinary tract infections and length of hospital stay. Ethical approval was obtained. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and SQUIRE checklists were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3439 patients screened, 2711 were included, with 544 in the after group. The percentage of patients without inappropriate indwelling catheterisation increased from 46% to 57%, and the proportion without inappropriate clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 34% to 67%. Additionally, overall catheter use decreased: the percentage of patients not receiving an indwelling catheter increased from 54% to 64%, while those not requiring clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 89% to 92%. Infection rates and hospital stay were similar (1.4% and 1.3%; 4.9 and 5.1 days, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a uniform protocol may significantly reduce inappropriate and overall catheterisation in neurosurgical patients, aligning with patient-centred, less invasive healthcare. Ongoing education and adherence to standardised protocols are crucial. Future research should assess the long-term sustainability of these strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020749/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导尿,包括留置和清洁间歇导尿,在围手术期和术后护理中很常见。尽管有指导方针,实践的变化是显著的。导尿不当的风险包括尿路感染和行动不便,导致住院时间延长和抗生素使用增加。本研究旨在通过适当的导尿来改善神经外科术后护理。方法:我们于2021年6月至2023年1月在四家荷兰医院进行了一项多中心的前后研究,包括接受垂体瘤或脊柱融合手术的成年神经外科患者。排除标准包括需要长期使用导管的情况。实施了一项多方面的战略,重点是统一的协议、教育方案和特定部门的冠军。主要结局为插管不当,用有序逻辑回归进行分析。次要结局包括总导尿、尿路感染和住院时间。获得伦理批准。加强流行病学观察性研究的报告和使用了SQUIRE检查表。结果:在筛选的3439例患者中,纳入2711例,术后组544例。未进行不适当留置置管的比例从46%上升到57%,未进行不适当清洁间歇置管的比例从34%上升到67%。此外,总体导管使用减少:未接受留置导管的患者百分比从54%增加到64%,而不需要清洁间歇导尿的患者百分比从89%上升到92%。感染率和住院时间相似(1.4%和1.3%;分别为4.9天和5.1天)。结论:实施统一的方案可以显著减少神经外科患者的不适当和全面置管,与以患者为中心、侵入性较小的医疗保健相一致。持续的教育和遵守标准化协议是至关重要的。未来的研究应评估这些战略的长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving postoperative care for neurosurgical patients by a standardised protocol for urinary catheter placement: a multicentre before-and-after implementation study.

Introduction: Urinary catheterisation, including indwelling and clean intermittent catheterisation, is common in perioperative and postoperative care. Despite guidelines, practice variation is significant. Inappropriate catheterisation risks include urinary tract infections and reduced mobility, leading to prolonged hospital stays and increased antibiotic use. This study aims to improve postoperative care through appropriate catheterisation in neurosurgical groups frequently subjected to catheterisation.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre, before-and-after study in four Dutch hospitals from June 2021 to January 2023, including adult neurosurgical patients who underwent pituitary gland tumour or spinal fusion surgery. Exclusion criteria included conditions requiring chronic catheter use. A multifaceted strategy was implemented, focusing on a uniform protocol, an educational programme and department-specific champions. The primary outcome was inappropriate catheterisation, analysed with ordinal logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included total catheterisations, urinary tract infections and length of hospital stay. Ethical approval was obtained. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and SQUIRE checklists were used.

Results: Among 3439 patients screened, 2711 were included, with 544 in the after group. The percentage of patients without inappropriate indwelling catheterisation increased from 46% to 57%, and the proportion without inappropriate clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 34% to 67%. Additionally, overall catheter use decreased: the percentage of patients not receiving an indwelling catheter increased from 54% to 64%, while those not requiring clean intermittent catheterisation rose from 89% to 92%. Infection rates and hospital stay were similar (1.4% and 1.3%; 4.9 and 5.1 days, respectively).

Conclusions: Implementing a uniform protocol may significantly reduce inappropriate and overall catheterisation in neurosurgical patients, aligning with patient-centred, less invasive healthcare. Ongoing education and adherence to standardised protocols are crucial. Future research should assess the long-term sustainability of these strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信