Zanubrutinib对不耐受ibrutinib/acalabrutinib的CLL/SLL患者耐受性良好且有效:最新结果。

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman
{"title":"Zanubrutinib对不耐受ibrutinib/acalabrutinib的CLL/SLL患者耐受性良好且有效:最新结果。","authors":"Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in CLL/SLL patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: Updated results.\",\"authors\":\"Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶(BTK)抑制剂如依鲁替尼彻底改变了慢性淋巴细胞白血病/小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(CLL/SLL)的治疗,尽管治疗相关的毒性限制了一些BTK抑制剂的使用。Zanubrutinib是一种有效的下一代BTK抑制剂,比ibrutinib或acalabrutinib具有更高的选择性。正在进行的2期单臂研究BGB-3111-215调查了zanubrutinib细胞恶性肿瘤患者对ibrutinib和/或acalabrutinib不耐受的安全性和有效性。本文给出了CLL/SLL患者的结果。患者服用zanubrutinib 160 mg BID或320 mg QD。在34.5个月的中位随访中,71例患者(仅伊鲁替尼不耐受,n=44;仅Acalabrutinib不耐受,n=17;伊鲁替尼和阿卡拉布替尼不耐受,n=10)接受≥1剂量的扎鲁替尼治疗。对于扎鲁替尼,54%(28/52)的伊鲁替尼不耐受患者和70%(19/27)的阿卡拉布替尼不耐受患者没有不耐受事件复发;不耐受性ae分别有60%和72%没有复发。复发性依鲁替尼不耐受不良事件中,64%为低度;44%的阿卡鲁替尼不耐受ae为较低级别。使用扎鲁替尼后,没有不耐受事件复发。最常见的复发性依鲁替尼不耐受和阿卡拉替尼不耐受事件分别是疲劳和腹泻。扎鲁替尼最常见的teae是疲劳(32%)、COVID-19(28%)、腹泻和挫伤(各24%)。≥3级teae发生率为61%,严重teae发生率为32%,导致停药的teae发生率为11%。在67名可评估疗效的患者中,94%的患者获得了疾病控制:30%的患者病情稳定,有最佳反应,64%的患者有部分或完全反应。这些数据表明,伊鲁替尼/阿卡拉布替尼不耐受的患者可能从改用扎鲁替尼治疗中获益。ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in CLL/SLL patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: Updated results.

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信