Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman
{"title":"Zanubrutinib对不耐受ibrutinib/acalabrutinib的CLL/SLL患者耐受性良好且有效:最新结果。","authors":"Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in CLL/SLL patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: Updated results.\",\"authors\":\"Mazyar Shadman, John M Burke, Jennifer Cultrera, Habte A Yimer, Syed F Zafar, Jamal Misleh, Subramanya S Rao, Charles M Farber, Aileen Cleary Cohen, Hui Yao, Adam Idoine, Qi An, Ian W Flinn, Jeff P Sharman\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Zanubrutinib is well tolerated and effective in CLL/SLL patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib: Updated results.
Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib revolutionized chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) treatment, although treatment-related toxicities limit the use of some BTK inhibitors. Zanubrutinib, a potent next-generation BTK inhibitor, has higher selectivity than ibrutinib or acalabrutinib. The ongoing phase 2, single-arm BGB-3111-215 study investigates the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib in patients with B-cell malignancies who are intolerant of ibrutinib and/or acalabrutinib. Here, results in patients with CLL/SLL are presented. Patients received zanubrutinib 160 mg BID or 320 mg QD. With a 34.5-month median follow-up, 71 patients (ibrutinib intolerant only, n=44; acalabrutinib intolerant only, n=17; ibrutinib and acalabrutinib intolerant, n=10) received ≥1 zanubrutinib dose. On zanubrutinib, 54% (28/52) of ibrutinib-intolerant patients and 70% (19/27) of acalabrutinib-intolerant patients experienced no recurrence of intolerance AEs; 60% and 72% of intolerance AEs did not recur, respectively. Of recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance AEs, 64% were lower grade; 44% of acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were lower grade. No intolerance AEs recurred at a higher grade with zanubrutinib. The most common recurrent ibrutinib-intolerance and acalabrutinib-intolerance AEs were fatigue and diarrhea, respectively. The most common TEAEs with zanubrutinib were fatigue (32%), COVID-19 (28%), and diarrhea and contusion (each 24%). Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 61%, serious TEAEs in 32%, and TEAEs leading to discontinuation in 11%. Of 67 efficacy-evaluable patients, 94% experienced disease control: 30% had a best response of stable disease and 64% had a partial or complete response. These data demonstrate that patients intolerant of ibrutinib/acalabrutinib may benefit from switching to zanubrutinib therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116437.
期刊介绍:
Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016.
Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.