Sruthi Ranganathan, Alessandro Hammond, Urvish Jain, Khushi Kohli, Nishwant Swami, Tej A Patel, Erin Jay G Feliciano, Paul L Nguyen, Kenrick Ng, Edward Christopher Dee, Bhav Jain
{"title":"转移性结肠癌的姑息治疗差异:美国种族分类回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Sruthi Ranganathan, Alessandro Hammond, Urvish Jain, Khushi Kohli, Nishwant Swami, Tej A Patel, Erin Jay G Feliciano, Paul L Nguyen, Kenrick Ng, Edward Christopher Dee, Bhav Jain","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2025-005478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care is important in addressing the needs of patients and their caregivers holistically, particularly where patients are diagnosed with an advanced cancer such as metastatic colon cancer. Racial or ethnic disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment have not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Cancer Database were used to identify patients with metastatic colon cancer. Patients were categorised into one of the following racial or ethnic groups: White, Black, Southeast Asian, East Asian, South Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHPI), other Asian and American Indian, Aleutian or Eskimo. The dependent variable was the receipt of palliative treatment, while the independent variable was the patients' racial or ethnic group. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to derive the adjusted ORs (AOR) and p values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to White patients, patients who identified as Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian were less likely to receive palliative treatment (Black AOR=0.944, 95% CI 0.905 to 0.985, p=0.008; Southeast Asians AOR=0.678, 95% CI 0.553 to 0.830, p<0.001; other Asian AOR=0.781, 95% CI 0.637 to 0.957, p=0.017). However, NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment (NHPI AOR=1.696, 95% CI 1.267 to 2.271, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian patients had decreased odds of receiving palliative treatment, while NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment, compared with White patients. Further studies are needed to disaggregate reasons behind these disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative treatment disparities in metastatic colon cancer: US retrospective cohort study with disaggregated ethnic groups.\",\"authors\":\"Sruthi Ranganathan, Alessandro Hammond, Urvish Jain, Khushi Kohli, Nishwant Swami, Tej A Patel, Erin Jay G Feliciano, Paul L Nguyen, Kenrick Ng, Edward Christopher Dee, Bhav Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2025-005478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care is important in addressing the needs of patients and their caregivers holistically, particularly where patients are diagnosed with an advanced cancer such as metastatic colon cancer. Racial or ethnic disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment have not been well studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Cancer Database were used to identify patients with metastatic colon cancer. Patients were categorised into one of the following racial or ethnic groups: White, Black, Southeast Asian, East Asian, South Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHPI), other Asian and American Indian, Aleutian or Eskimo. The dependent variable was the receipt of palliative treatment, while the independent variable was the patients' racial or ethnic group. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to derive the adjusted ORs (AOR) and p values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to White patients, patients who identified as Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian were less likely to receive palliative treatment (Black AOR=0.944, 95% CI 0.905 to 0.985, p=0.008; Southeast Asians AOR=0.678, 95% CI 0.553 to 0.830, p<0.001; other Asian AOR=0.781, 95% CI 0.637 to 0.957, p=0.017). However, NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment (NHPI AOR=1.696, 95% CI 1.267 to 2.271, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian patients had decreased odds of receiving palliative treatment, while NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment, compared with White patients. Further studies are needed to disaggregate reasons behind these disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:姑息治疗在全面解决患者及其护理人员的需求方面非常重要,特别是当患者被诊断为晚期癌症(如转移性结肠癌)时。在接受姑息治疗方面的种族或民族差异尚未得到很好的研究。方法:使用来自国家癌症数据库的数据来识别转移性结肠癌患者。患者被分为以下种族或民族:白人、黑人、东南亚、东亚、南亚、夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民(NHPI)、其他亚洲和美洲印第安人、阿留申人或爱斯基摩人。因变量为接受姑息治疗,自变量为患者的种族或民族。采用多变量logistic回归得到调整后的or (AOR)和p值。结果:与白人患者相比,黑人、东南亚或其他亚洲患者接受姑息治疗的可能性较小(黑人AOR=0.944, 95% CI 0.905 ~ 0.985, p=0.008;东南亚AOR=0.678, 95% CI 0.553 ~ 0.830,结论:黑人、东南亚或其他亚洲患者接受姑息治疗的几率较白人患者低,而NHPI患者接受姑息治疗的几率较白人患者高。需要进一步的研究来分解这些差异背后的原因在接受姑息治疗。
Palliative treatment disparities in metastatic colon cancer: US retrospective cohort study with disaggregated ethnic groups.
Background: Palliative care is important in addressing the needs of patients and their caregivers holistically, particularly where patients are diagnosed with an advanced cancer such as metastatic colon cancer. Racial or ethnic disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment have not been well studied.
Methods: Data from the National Cancer Database were used to identify patients with metastatic colon cancer. Patients were categorised into one of the following racial or ethnic groups: White, Black, Southeast Asian, East Asian, South Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (NHPI), other Asian and American Indian, Aleutian or Eskimo. The dependent variable was the receipt of palliative treatment, while the independent variable was the patients' racial or ethnic group. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to derive the adjusted ORs (AOR) and p values.
Results: Relative to White patients, patients who identified as Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian were less likely to receive palliative treatment (Black AOR=0.944, 95% CI 0.905 to 0.985, p=0.008; Southeast Asians AOR=0.678, 95% CI 0.553 to 0.830, p<0.001; other Asian AOR=0.781, 95% CI 0.637 to 0.957, p=0.017). However, NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment (NHPI AOR=1.696, 95% CI 1.267 to 2.271, p<0.001).
Conclusions: Black, Southeast Asian or other Asian patients had decreased odds of receiving palliative treatment, while NHPI patients had greater odds of receiving palliative treatment, compared with White patients. Further studies are needed to disaggregate reasons behind these disparities in the receipt of palliative treatment.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.