Simon Alfred Handley, Suzanne Barnes, Nicole Jenkins, Troy Wanandy
{"title":"结合位点脑脊液kappa游离轻链测定的性能。","authors":"Simon Alfred Handley, Suzanne Barnes, Nicole Jenkins, Troy Wanandy","doi":"10.1177/00045632251337616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMeasurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLCs) for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis has generated interest as an alternative to CSF oligoclonal bands due to its rapid turnaround time and ability to automate the assay. A turbidimetric immunoassay - Freelite Mx, is available from the Binding Site, but published data on performance is scant. Therefore, we undertook a multicentre sample comparison and investigated reagent lot-to-lot-variation (LTLV).MethodsIntra-/inter-assay accuracy and imprecision of the Freelite Mx assay on the Binding Site Optilite analyser was assessed. Twenty paired CSF/serum samples were sent to three laboratories within Australia for the measurement of CSF/serum KFLC/albumin and concentrations compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank (rs), and Passing-Bablok analysis. Lot-to-lot-variation between three reagent lots was undertaken by analysis of 20 CSF samples.ResultsIntra- and inter-assay imprecision was ≤4.4 and ≤4.1%, respectively. There was a good correlation (rs = ≥0.98) between sites for the measured CSF KFLC concentration, and no significant difference in the median concentration measured between sites (3.31, 2.78, and 3.48 mg/L, <i>P</i> = .98). The median bias between reagent lots was <4%, the intercept of the regression between lots was between -0.02 and 0.06 mg/L, and the slope ranged from 0.96 to 1.07.ConclusionOverall, there was a good agreement in CSF KFLC concentrations among laboratories, and LTLV was deemed acceptable. Ascertaining biological variability of CSF KFLCs and the participation of laboratories in quality assurance schemes would assist with harmonisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251337616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Binding Site cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains assay.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Alfred Handley, Suzanne Barnes, Nicole Jenkins, Troy Wanandy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00045632251337616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundMeasurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLCs) for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis has generated interest as an alternative to CSF oligoclonal bands due to its rapid turnaround time and ability to automate the assay. A turbidimetric immunoassay - Freelite Mx, is available from the Binding Site, but published data on performance is scant. Therefore, we undertook a multicentre sample comparison and investigated reagent lot-to-lot-variation (LTLV).MethodsIntra-/inter-assay accuracy and imprecision of the Freelite Mx assay on the Binding Site Optilite analyser was assessed. Twenty paired CSF/serum samples were sent to three laboratories within Australia for the measurement of CSF/serum KFLC/albumin and concentrations compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank (rs), and Passing-Bablok analysis. Lot-to-lot-variation between three reagent lots was undertaken by analysis of 20 CSF samples.ResultsIntra- and inter-assay imprecision was ≤4.4 and ≤4.1%, respectively. There was a good correlation (rs = ≥0.98) between sites for the measured CSF KFLC concentration, and no significant difference in the median concentration measured between sites (3.31, 2.78, and 3.48 mg/L, <i>P</i> = .98). The median bias between reagent lots was <4%, the intercept of the regression between lots was between -0.02 and 0.06 mg/L, and the slope ranged from 0.96 to 1.07.ConclusionOverall, there was a good agreement in CSF KFLC concentrations among laboratories, and LTLV was deemed acceptable. Ascertaining biological variability of CSF KFLCs and the participation of laboratories in quality assurance schemes would assist with harmonisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"45632251337616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251337616\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251337616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
测量脑脊液(CSF) kappa自由轻链(KFLCs)用于检测鞘内免疫球蛋白合成,由于其快速的转换时间和自动化分析的能力,作为脑脊液低克隆带的替代方法,引起了人们的兴趣。一种浊度免疫测定法- Freelite Mx,可从Binding Site获得,但发表的性能数据很少。因此,我们进行了多中心样品比较,并研究了试剂批次间差异(LTLV)。方法评价Freelite Mx在Binding Site Optilite分析仪上的单次/间准确度和不精密度。20个配对的CSF/血清样本被送到澳大利亚的三个实验室,用于测量CSF/血清KFLC/白蛋白和浓度,并使用Kruskal-Wallis试验、Spearman秩(rs)和Passing-Bablok分析进行比较。通过分析20份脑脊液样本,在三个试剂批次之间进行了批次间的差异。结果单、间不精密度分别为≤4.4和≤4.1%。测得的脑脊液KFLC浓度在不同部位之间有良好的相关性(rs =≥0.98),测得的中位浓度在不同部位之间无显著差异(3.31、2.78和3.48 mg/L, P = 0.98)。试剂批次间的中位偏差为
Performance of the Binding Site cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains assay.
BackgroundMeasurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLCs) for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis has generated interest as an alternative to CSF oligoclonal bands due to its rapid turnaround time and ability to automate the assay. A turbidimetric immunoassay - Freelite Mx, is available from the Binding Site, but published data on performance is scant. Therefore, we undertook a multicentre sample comparison and investigated reagent lot-to-lot-variation (LTLV).MethodsIntra-/inter-assay accuracy and imprecision of the Freelite Mx assay on the Binding Site Optilite analyser was assessed. Twenty paired CSF/serum samples were sent to three laboratories within Australia for the measurement of CSF/serum KFLC/albumin and concentrations compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank (rs), and Passing-Bablok analysis. Lot-to-lot-variation between three reagent lots was undertaken by analysis of 20 CSF samples.ResultsIntra- and inter-assay imprecision was ≤4.4 and ≤4.1%, respectively. There was a good correlation (rs = ≥0.98) between sites for the measured CSF KFLC concentration, and no significant difference in the median concentration measured between sites (3.31, 2.78, and 3.48 mg/L, P = .98). The median bias between reagent lots was <4%, the intercept of the regression between lots was between -0.02 and 0.06 mg/L, and the slope ranged from 0.96 to 1.07.ConclusionOverall, there was a good agreement in CSF KFLC concentrations among laboratories, and LTLV was deemed acceptable. Ascertaining biological variability of CSF KFLCs and the participation of laboratories in quality assurance schemes would assist with harmonisation.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).